Marshall or Lillard?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Marshall or Lillard?

  • Kendall Marshall

    Votes: 18 30.5%
  • Damian Lillard

    Votes: 41 69.5%

  • Total voters
    59

Rastapopoulos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
42,708
Likes
27,066
Points
113
Say you have to pick one of them. Which one would you pick?
 
Of the two I would pick Lillard because while he might not end up as solid as Marshall, he has the chance to be super special. Marshall to me equals Andre Miller. Lillard to me has the chance to equal a more dynamic guard like Rose or maybe even Westbrook......or at least versions of them
 
Of the two I would pick Lillard because while he might not end up as solid as Marshall, he has the chance to be super special. Marshall to me equals Andre Miller. Lillard to me has the chance to equal a more dynamic guard like Rose or maybe even Westbrook......or at least versions of them

Pretty much the way I see it as well. One is a safe pick for a non special player and the other has more upside potential.
 
I'd take Marshall if we had more scoring on our team. But even then, I see Lillard as being more impactful in the current NBA. So many scoring PGs around that you need someone like him for other PGs to guard. I see him becoming a more athletic Curry. Can't pass on a player like that.
 
Damian Lillard 6'1.75" socks 6' 2.75" shoes and 6' 7.5" wing 8' 0" reach

Kendall Marshall 6'3.25" socks 6' 4.25" shoes and 6' 5.5" wing 7' 10.5" reach
 
Last edited:
Generally I'm boom or bust guy, but there's just something about Marshall that intrigues me. You say Marshall is Andre Miller. I see possibly Jason Kidd--a player who can see the play develop 2 seconds before everyone else and make the pass nobody sees coming. I think he does have a shot to be special.
 
I'd take Marshall if we had more scoring on our team. But even then, I see Lillard as being more impactful in the current NBA. So many scoring PGs around that you need someone like him for other PGs to guard. I see him becoming a more athletic Curry. Can't pass on a player like that.

It's funny how, now that we don't have Roy around, we can finally invest in a scoring PG instead of trading them away because they aren't pass-first.

That said, Marshall's reach is kinda tiny; I'd take Lillard on measurements alone because I also buy books based on their covers and cereal based on the cartoon characters on the box.
 
I chose Lillard but the the thing is Lillard would have to be at#6 while Marshall could be at # 11.

The question I am now asking myself after looking at some of these updated mock drafts is who do you choose between Lillard, Beal, and Barnes? If it goes Davis, Robinson, G-Kidd, and Drummond then either Barnes or Beal will be available. I guess there is an outside chance Drummond or G-Kidd drops, but as of right now it looks like we need to choose between Lillard, Beal and Barnes.

If we go with Lillard or Barnes then maybe Austin Rivers is available at 11 but I think his measurements now move him in the top 10.
 
Lillard's jumper and handles were as good as advertised in the combine.

Marshall may be a nice passer in college, but lacks a quick first step that he would need to excel as a point in the NBA.
 
I really wanted to vote for Marshall, I think he's going to be a really nice setup man in the NBA and in a vacuum I think I'd take him, but given the Blazers' dearth of ball-handlers and dribble-drive shot creators I think Lilliard would be capable of having a more immediate impact and his ability to catch and shoot doesn't hurt either in a two man game with LaMarcus. The rub is finding guys that can quickly develop or contribute so you maximize the next 3 or so years of LaMarcus' prime. That said, I'd be happy with either guy, both look like they could be pretty good pros.
 
Last edited:
I chose Lillard but the the thing is Lillard would have to be at#6 while Marshall could be at # 11.

The question I am now asking myself after looking at some of these updated mock drafts is who do you choose between Lillard, Beal, and Barnes? If it goes Davis, Robinson, G-Kidd, and Drummond then either Barnes or Beal will be available. I guess there is an outside chance Drummond or G-Kidd drops, but as of right now it looks like we need to choose between Lillard, Beal and Barnes.

If we go with Lillard or Barnes then maybe Austin Rivers is available at 11 but I think his measurements now move him in the top 10.

Personally, unless he's a top 50 of all time talent, I'm loathe to take a PG at #6. We need a PG, SG, C, and serious bench depth for shooting and rebounding (aka, size). We may want to pick a PF and slide LA to center. With decent PG's available via free agency I hope we wait until #11 to consider a PG, if even so at all. Trade or sign a FA PG and use the draft for shooters and bigs.
 
Personally, unless he's a top 50 of all time talent, I'm loathe to take a PG at #6. We need a PG, SG, C, and serious bench depth for shooting and rebounding (aka, size). We may want to pick a PF and slide LA to center. With decent PG's available via free agency I hope we wait until #11 to consider a PG, if even so at all. Trade or sign a FA PG and use the draft for shooters and bigs.

I agree with you for the most part, I would take Beal over Lillard. But it could very well be Barnes that is availble. We should go with the 'best availbe player" philosophy that we have ignored in the past. Is Barnes that guy? Do we take him if Beal is gone? He is not a PF C or SG......

The one thing about Lillard is that he is a shooter as well. So he kind of takes the pressure off of getting a SG in the draft. But a good one will still be available.
 
Lillard's jumper and handles were as good as advertised in the combine.

Marshall may be a nice passer in college, but lacks a quick first step that he would need to excel as a point in the NBA.

today's speed/agility/vertical testing will be especially interesting for the Lillard/Marshall comparison
 
I thought so, could easily be wrong

i could see Marshall opting out but hope he does not, Lillard seems on a mission and I would bet he tests today

I like those players. The ones that say bring it, I will destroy anyone. So far for me, Lillard, Thomas, White and Harkless are those guys
 
Pretty much the way I see it as well. One is a safe pick for a non special player and the other has more upside potential.

That's exactly how I see it. Only I think we've got those labels attached to different players. (Hint: the "upside potential" one has the best "pure point" rating in the history of the DX rankings)
 
I think if you want a player like Lillard, there are dozens playing overseas. Good shooting, low-PG skills players of about 6'-6'3" are pretty dang common. Real PG skills are much rarer.
 
NBA Guru ‏@NBAGuru
Damian Lillard looks fantastic in the agility drills. Easily one of the quickest guys here, if not THE quickest

Thx MM
 
i think lillard will be the better defender so i will go with him
 
I am full on the Lillard bandwagon but I wouldn't be upset with either.
 
There was a post in another thread (forgot which) that compared FTA for different players, and Lillian came
out on top.
Lilliard = star-type player
Marshall = fantastic role-player

We have good role-players, we need more attackers, imho.
 
There was a post in another thread (forgot which) that compared FTA for different players, and Lillian came
out on top.
Lilliard = star-type player
Marshall = fantastic role-player

We have good role-players, we need more attackers, imho.

Completely agree.

Lillard has the making of someone who is going to be special.

He measured better than Kendall (longer reach and wingspan), shoots better, plays better D, is an underrated passer, attacks the basket, and genuinely thinks he is the best player in the draft. Love the confidence.

However, I'd take Drummond at 6 over either.

Ideally, I'd want Drummond and Lillard.
 
I think if you want a player like Lillard, there are dozens playing overseas. Good shooting, low-PG skills players of about 6'-6'3" are pretty dang common. Real PG skills are much rarer.

Yeah, like Sergio Rodriguez.
 
I like tall slower PGs with court vision.... I love Kidd/Andre and now Marshall. Sorry.
 
Yeah, like Sergio Rodriguez.

the assumption you make about the 'low PG skills" is IMO unfounded. because he had few options and was required on to score a lot enters into the equation, he also turned the ball over very little, something like 3rd lowest in the nation, yet I agree the big Q is his overall PG skills but I would not say "low" at this time
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top