Matt Barnes

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

roroyo

Active Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
133
Likes
141
Points
43
I know, I know. It's not going to be very popular here, but I'll put it as kind of Overton's window. Idea of old headcase is not fantastic - Matt Barnes is unthinkable at the moment. For me it's radical. Point is, this team, starting from head coach is bunch of soft kittens. I hate it.

I've been sreaming for vets for some time. Screaming for vets was the reason I've opened acc here. Our main vet at the moment is ET and he seems to frustrated at times. So is Dame.

We need someone badly. Someone to wake this losers up. There is no emotions whatsoever in this team. We've got happy GM (happy to take money from delusional owner), we've got "it will be ok" coach (nice guy, but can't keep bad worker just cos he's nice) and young players not involved in playing at all (so they can't develop). We've got big 3 without steering wheel, wasting their time in Oregon.

Matt Barnes would be upgrade over Heartless. He is no pussy. He's got experience. And he can travel here if we ask Derek Fisher to be our new coach.
 
Yes to Barnes. Not sure about Fisher. NY was bad situation for him. Would've been bad for Kerr too. But Fish does know winning basketball. Hmmm
 
Jesus Christ. Two of the scummiest human beings to ever play the game, and you want to bring them here? No thank you very much.

Maybe I misunderstood the post, but I think the idea of bring Fisher here was satire. He and Barnes aren't exactly friendly with each other.
 
Jeezus
Settle down. It's a couple losses not the MATT BARNES and DEREK FISCHER moment.
 
If I was still playing NBA2K10 I might suggest those guys for our bench too.
 
Derek Fisher joke is rather obvious. But the fact we BADLY need vets is not. We goin 12:0, 20:0 on daily basis. Our players don't know what to do in so many occasions. And we've got Harkless on SF.

And it's not "couple losses" - it's two years of misery.
 
What happened to that number of posts requirement before allowing newbies to start threads?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top