Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, no kidding Nate. You are the worst coach ever. The Rockets had no clue Rudy was a good three point shooter and were going to leave him wide open, but we all heard you in that timeout say "Whatever we do, don't pass the ball to Rudy."Rudy is leading the league in three pt. % in the playoffs.
Ouch.
Good call, Nate. Idiot.
it was a horrible play because it really wasn't a play at all. it was inbounded and he shoots it 3 feet behind the line. once again, no offense from our coach and i'd rather have blake or brandon shooting that. and why couldn't he get a play drawn up to get our best shooter the rock? other coaches do but ours backs down and draws up a play for our 4th best option on the court.
You know we ended up as the 2nd most efficient offense in the league right? But don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
You know we ended up as the 2nd most efficient offense in the league right? But don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
The thing that's been driving me crazy this series (and contributing to shitty rebound numbers) is how often we're shooting with no one in position to get a rebound. Granted a lot of the time LMA, Outlaw, or Channing play out there but either they need to follow their miss or we need our SF or SG to slide in for an attempt at an offensive rebound. Houston doesn't run AT ALL, there's no excuse for it.
IF this was the designed play, then why the hell didn't any of our guys break to the hoop to grab an offensive rebound knowing the play was a quick shot for Travis?
Please. Call spade a spade, will ya? That was a total fucked up play. If we had 1 or 2 seconds left, then that play is fine. But we had about 10 seconds. You're telling my a fade away 25 footer with two defenders contesting the shot was a good play?
You know we ended up as the 2nd most efficient offense in the league right? But don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
How do you know that was the play? How do you know that the Rockets didn't take away the first couple options?Please. Call spade a spade, will ya? That was a total fucked up play. If we had 1 or 2 seconds left, then that play is fine. But we had about 10 seconds. You're telling my a fade away 25 footer with two defenders contesting the shot was a good play?
Are you leaving out the other sets we run or are those the only ones you've been able to identify?This is a fact that is helped by our insane offensive rebounding. Our offense all year has been the Roy ISO, the pick and pop with LaMarcus, and the Travis ISO when he's a PF. It is very difficult for this to work good in the playoffs.
Are you leaving out the other sets we run or are those the only ones you've been able to identify?
And why do you think our offensive rebounding is so good? Because our offense forces other teams big men to help out, leaving the glass wide open for us to get offensive rebounds. That seems like a good thing to me.
Please. Call spade a spade, will ya? That was a total fucked up play. If we had 1 or 2 seconds left, then that play is fine. But we had about 10 seconds. You're telling my a fade away 25 footer with two defenders contesting the shot was a good play?
So let's say Nate drew up a play. The first three options were Roy, Rudy, and Blake in that order. As the broke they huddle, Nate says to the team, "Take the first good look you get, and if we miss and don't get the offensive rebound, we need to foul." The guys walk out on the court, Travis ends up getting the ball, and he thinks a wide open 25ft three, and he thinks its a good shot, so he takes it. Would you consider that a bad play? Or when you say it's a "bad play" do you really mean poor execution by the players? I could understand an argument for that.I don't. But I can only assume that if that was the play, then it is a bad one. And I can only assume that it was a designed play simply because Travis caught it out of bound and hurried a shot up, as though it was a designed out of bound play with only a few seconds left.
Again, I don't know. But Travis shot it up so quickly, what chance did Houston had to take away any other options?
In my scenario, Travis took what he thought was a good shot, when in reality it wasn't. We don't know that Nate liked that shot, yet we are all assuming he did. I don't understand how the design of the play in that scenario could be considered bad at all.Both execution and design if that was the case. Any play designed to have a guy come off a screen to take a contest 25 footer with 10 seconds left cannot justifiably be considered a good play. Whether that was the design or not, I don't know, but it sure looked as if it were.
Again with the bullshit. Just answer me this question: were you happy with that shot? It didn't go in, so obviously you're not happy about it I am sure. But did you think that it was a good shot?
Just because a full court shot goes in doesn't make it a bad shot. Just as a missed open layup is not a bad shot. The distinction between a good and a bad shot is in the selection of the shot, not the result.
What if the play was designed for him to catch it 22ft from the hoop, on balance and shoot it, but he took an extra step (or was forced out) and decided the fade-away was a good shot?Like I said, "Any play designed to have a guy come off a screen to take a contest 25 footer with 10 seconds left cannot justifiably be considered a good play." We don't know if that in fact was the design (it is my opinion that it was, as it looked Travis knew he would take that shot). What we can judge is that it was a bad setup leading up to a bad shot.
You and I just saw that play differently then. To me, a contested fadeaway 25 footer is a piss poor shot. We could have had much better looks than the one Travis had, imo.
And yes, glad Travis showed up.
No, "clowns" make claims without providing links . . .ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME? THIS GUY IS A CLOWN.
