Science Neanderthals Weren't the Only Species Ancient Humans Hooked Up With

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,016
Likes
147,624
Points
115
Whether we want to accept it or not, our fossil record shows that ancient humans regularly mated with Neanderthals. We now know that most non-Africans have at least a little bit of Neanderthal DNA, which is partially responsible for their unique habits and looks. On Thursday, however, scientists reported in Cell that our ancient history is even more scandalous than we thought. Neanderthals, it seems, weren’t the only other hominins that anatomically modern humans decided to screw.


Enter bachelor number two: the Denisovan.

The study shows that interbreeding with Denisovan hominins wasn’t an isolated affair, either. It was at least a two-wave event that happened in East Asia and Oceania. Before this study, scientists already knew that the genomes of Aboriginal people in Australia and Papua New Guinea contain fragments of Denisovan DNA. The new study shows there are uniquely different Denisovan genomes in the DNA of East Asian individuals, indicating that interbreeding with Homo sapiens happened in two independent episodes.

“In this work with East Asians, we find a second set of Denisovan ancestry that we do not find in the South Asians and Papuans,” senior author and University of Washington biostatistician Sharon Browning, Ph.D., explained in a statement released Thursday. “This Denisovan ancestry in East Asians seems to be something they acquired themselves.”

artist-rendering-of-ancient-hominin-breeding.png


Browning, along with a team of scientists from the University of Washington and Princeton University, came to this conclusion by comparing 5,600 whole genome sequences from people who live in Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas to the Denisovan genome, pieced together from DNA extracted from the pinkie bone of a young Denisovan girl discovered in Siberia in 2008. In 2010, scientists who sequenced her genome declared she belonged to a group of archaic humans closely related to Neanderthals. Today, her genome is the reference point for all Denisovan ancestry.

In the current study, pieces of DNA from the Papuans matched with the Denisovan genome, but the DNA extracted from Han Chinese, Chinese Dai, and Japanese were a “much closer match.” This means that the Denisovan genome is more closely related to the modern East Asian population than to modern Papuans, although both do share Denisovan ancestry.

Browning concluded that two distinct Denisovan populations mated with humans. Both of these populations mated with the ancestors of East Asians, but one population mated with the ancestors of South Asians and Oceanians. The team assumes these hookups happened pretty soon after humans left Africaaround 50,000 years ago, but they don’t know where it happened first. The fact that the Denisovan girl was found in Siberia but rare remnants of Denisovan DNA are found throughout Asia suggests the species ranged widely, but their population numbers were never very high.

Now, Browning and her team want to study more Asian populations, Africans, and Native Americans to seek out more Denisovan DNA.


“We want to look throughout the world to see if we can find evidence of interbreeding with other archaic humans,” says Browning. “There are signs that intermixing with archaic humans was happening in Africa, but given the warmer climate no one has yet found African archaic human fossils with sufficient DNA for sequencing.”

https://www.inverse.com/article/42346-denisovan-neanderthal-ancient-humans-mating
 
SlyPokerDog does have a point. Humans have shown they will cross-breed across all lines. Sort of shows how stupid (as well as evil) racism is, we are all totally "impure".

I remember my genetics prof demonstrating it might be theoretically possible to cross human/chimp but there are no known cases; apparently humans and chimps don't turn each other on.
 
Whether we want to accept it or not, our fossil record shows that ancient humans regularly mated with Neanderthals. We now know that most non-Africans have at least a little bit of Neanderthal DNA, which is partially responsible for their unique habits and looks. On Thursday, however, scientists reported in Cell that our ancient history is even more scandalous than we thought. Neanderthals, it seems, weren’t the only other hominins that anatomically modern humans decided to screw.


Enter bachelor number two: the Denisovan.

The study shows that interbreeding with Denisovan hominins wasn’t an isolated affair, either. It was at least a two-wave event that happened in East Asia and Oceania. Before this study, scientists already knew that the genomes of Aboriginal people in Australia and Papua New Guinea contain fragments of Denisovan DNA. The new study shows there are uniquely different Denisovan genomes in the DNA of East Asian individuals, indicating that interbreeding with Homo sapiens happened in two independent episodes.

“In this work with East Asians, we find a second set of Denisovan ancestry that we do not find in the South Asians and Papuans,” senior author and University of Washington biostatistician Sharon Browning, Ph.D., explained in a statement released Thursday. “This Denisovan ancestry in East Asians seems to be something they acquired themselves.”

artist-rendering-of-ancient-hominin-breeding.png


Browning, along with a team of scientists from the University of Washington and Princeton University, came to this conclusion by comparing 5,600 whole genome sequences from people who live in Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas to the Denisovan genome, pieced together from DNA extracted from the pinkie bone of a young Denisovan girl discovered in Siberia in 2008. In 2010, scientists who sequenced her genome declared she belonged to a group of archaic humans closely related to Neanderthals. Today, her genome is the reference point for all Denisovan ancestry.

In the current study, pieces of DNA from the Papuans matched with the Denisovan genome, but the DNA extracted from Han Chinese, Chinese Dai, and Japanese were a “much closer match.” This means that the Denisovan genome is more closely related to the modern East Asian population than to modern Papuans, although both do share Denisovan ancestry.

Browning concluded that two distinct Denisovan populations mated with humans. Both of these populations mated with the ancestors of East Asians, but one population mated with the ancestors of South Asians and Oceanians. The team assumes these hookups happened pretty soon after humans left Africaaround 50,000 years ago, but they don’t know where it happened first. The fact that the Denisovan girl was found in Siberia but rare remnants of Denisovan DNA are found throughout Asia suggests the species ranged widely, but their population numbers were never very high.

Now, Browning and her team want to study more Asian populations, Africans, and Native Americans to seek out more Denisovan DNA.


“We want to look throughout the world to see if we can find evidence of interbreeding with other archaic humans,” says Browning. “There are signs that intermixing with archaic humans was happening in Africa, but given the warmer climate no one has yet found African archaic human fossils with sufficient DNA for sequencing.”

https://www.inverse.com/article/42346-denisovan-neanderthal-ancient-humans-mating

For proof you only have to look at the women Trump had sex with.
 
SlyPokerDog does have a point. Humans have shown they will cross-breed across all lines. Sort of shows how stupid (as well as evil) racism is, we are all totally "impure".

I remember my genetics prof demonstrating it might be theoretically possible to cross human/chimp but there are no known cases; apparently humans and chimps don't turn each other on.

Are you kidding me? I've seen videos of women having sexual intercourse with dogs and donkeys. I'm sure Chimps aren't any worse than those two.
 
I probably don't want to know the answer to this...but why have you seen such?

I told you I was in the Army. I believe I also told you I was in Vietnam. Hell, I even saw ears cut of dead (hopefully) enemy soldiers for God's sake. You didn't want to go over there.
 
I told you I was in the Army. I believe I also told you I was in Vietnam. Hell, I even saw ears cut of dead (hopefully) enemy soldiers for God's sake. You didn't want to go over there.
One thing to talk about atrocities you witnessed first hand during an undesirable circumstance (thank you for your service, BTW). But you said videos, which I assume you watched voluntarily.

Never mind, though--I really probably don't want to know...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top