Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,234
- Likes
- 57,488
- Points
- 113
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2009/news/story?id=4871697
The way I read it, the NFL doesn't take issue with "who dat" t-shirts, it's the t-shirts that have the Saints logo or other team identification along with "who dat" that they are trying to stop.
With that said, the Saints logo is the Fleur-de-lis, which has been around for hundreds of years. I really don't think the NFL has much ground to stand on. They really are the No Fun League.
Who owns "Who Dat?"
Some T-shirt makers are asking that question after they were hit with cease-and-desist letters from the NFL demanding that they stop selling shirts with the traditional cheer of New Orleans Saints fans.
The National Football League says the shirts infringe on a legal trademark it owns. Separately, two brothers and longtime Saints fans claim they own the phrase, which was around before the long-downtrodden team's inception in 1966.
The league said Friday it's not trying to exclude all uses of Who Dat and the fleur-de-lis logo -- just when either is used in combination with other Saints trademarks, like their fleur-de-lis logo and uniform designs.
The way I read it, the NFL doesn't take issue with "who dat" t-shirts, it's the t-shirts that have the Saints logo or other team identification along with "who dat" that they are trying to stop.
With that said, the Saints logo is the Fleur-de-lis, which has been around for hundreds of years. I really don't think the NFL has much ground to stand on. They really are the No Fun League.
