Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,119
- Likes
- 26,475
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think we should waste our number 11 pick to just unload Jerami. If we have to attach a FRP to move him then we need to hold onto him.View attachment 74173
In this scenario we would waive Scary Terry. We don't want him anywhere near Portland.
What if we end up with Miami's #20 in the above scenario? That would get us somebody like Noah Penda or Jase Richardson.I don't think we should waste our number 11 pick to just unload Jerami. If we have to attach a FRP to move him then we need to hold onto him.
I don't think we should waste our number 11 pick to just unload Jerami. If we have to attach a FRP to move him then we need to hold onto him.
Yeah, I don't think trading down to get out of Jerami's contract would be too bad. I was also thinking if a team wanted a FRP for him they could have the worst of the 2029 FRPs (ours, the Bucks and the Celtics).What if we end up with Miami's #20 in the above scenario? That would get us somebody like Noah Penda or Jase Richardson.
Yeah, his exit interview sounded like he wanted out. I remember something about him, his agent and Joe trying to figure things out.I think he's best suited for the bench if he stays. I may have read his exit interview incorrectly, but as I recall, he was not thrilled with his role as a 3 and D player. He wants the ball in his hands more, and that only happens with the second unit. (If at all)
I don't hate this. Vando off the bench, waive Vincent and Kleber and then try to flip DFS to a team with an exception.
Then he can take a fukkin pay cut! Yeah I know that can't happen under CBA rules but he should be content to do what we tell him given the money we pay him and how shitty he played last yearYeah, his exit interview sounded like he wanted out. I remember something about him, his agent and Joe trying to figure things out.
Agreed. If we had an immediate use of cutting his salary like we were able to get an all-star or were going to save $100 million of tax, or couldn't resign Sharpe/Camara I get doing it.I don't think we should waste our number 11 pick to just unload Jerami. If we have to attach a FRP to move him then we need to hold onto him.
So you want to trade Grant for someone better than him (ok, but we probably need to add some stuff) and for someone that would start over our young guys?Austin Reaves or bust
So you want to trade Grant for someone better than him (ok, but we probably need to add some stuff) and for someone that would start over our young guys?
Don't we want to move Grant so young guys get more time?
Yeah, that way they split his cap hit 5 ways and each team gets to play him 12 games because Jerami likes to keep his total games played around 60.Trade Grant to:
Brooklyn
Atlanta
New Orleans
Charlotte
Washington
Austin Reaves is better than Jerami Grant, yes. Grant has a shitty contract and regressed tremendously last year. Reaves had a better year than Shaedon Sharpe last year and could potentially Start over him next year too if we had him.What? Do you think Austin is better than Grant?
Not sure what you want to do but i don't want to "Help" the Lakers.
Hope that helps.
Yeah, that way they split his cap hit 5 ways and each team gets to play him 12 games because Jerami likes to keep his total games played around 60.
Reaves was in his 4th year. Shaedon had a better 3rd year than Reaves.Austin Reaves is better than Jerami Grant, yes. Grant has a shitty contract and regressed tremendously last year. Reaves had a better year than Shaedon Sharpe last year and could potentially Start over him next year too if we had him.
That's arguable.Reaves was in his 4th year. Shaedon had a better 3rd year than Reaves.
Sprague on the radio just said “there is a deal in place for Grant”
take that for what it’s worth
Would assume we need to send something else to the Raptors but what? #11 is too much... Maybe we send them a swap some year.that would be great to get our pick back.
I can’t help but think about the fact that the books have us as the favorite to land rj Barrett.
Sportsbooks are always the most accurate
For Chicago it makes sense as #11 could be quite a bit better than a pick in the 15-30 range. For us it helps clear up that future pick debt. We have quite a bit of youth now so #11 isn't critical. They really have a pretty clean cap sheet so might not be worried about the extra 2 years on a Grant deal. If they or other teams view Grants contract as highly negative we're probably just stuck with him.that would be great to get our pick back.
I can’t help but think about the fact that the books have us as the favorite to land rj Barrett.
Sportsbooks are always the most accurate