OT: Nerlens Noel Carted Off Court Tonight

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

That's sad.... reminds me of Shaun Livingston a bit, just not nearly as gruesome.
 
I wonder what, if any, impact this will have on his draft status.
 
I wonder how this impacts the draft prospects of guys from Gonzaga?

Pretty sure this moves the Olynyk Clinic up to the #1 overall spot, based on number of replies to a potential draftee thread. Or, maybe The Clinic was already #1, and this impacts MacLemore?
 
The injury was ugly. Full speed and landing at an angle -- IMO it looks like a patella injury.
 
IF, and this has a ton of qualifiers with it...IF for some reason he misses the rest of the season AND comes out in the draft (and it's a patella/ACL or whatever injury), and he was available at whatever spot Portland drafts, would you still take him?

Barring Muhammad being available (he's my personal favorite), I think it would be difficult to pass him up.

Am I a lunatic (in this regard I mean..I already know I am in every other aspect)?
 
I bet he stays another year if it's as serious as it looks.
 
Why? If he has knee problems and Blazers luck out and win the draft lottery he knows we'll pick him first.

If anything, I think this team would be the one team that WOULDN'T take a risk on someone with knee problems.
 
IF, and this has a ton of qualifiers with it...IF for some reason he misses the rest of the season AND comes out in the draft (and it's a patella/ACL or whatever injury), and he was available at whatever spot Portland drafts, would you still take him?

Barring Muhammad being available (he's my personal favorite), I think it would be difficult to pass him up.

Am I a lunatic (in this regard I mean..I already know I am in every other aspect)?

You're out of your freaking mind.
 
If we're sitting at 10 and he's there? Absolutely you take him. #1 talent at 10, I'll take the risk.
 
Personally, I think our first pick might be at #38 or so, so yeah, I'd take him there. ;) Probably Olynyk, first, though, if they were both on the board.
 
I know he doesn't play for Gonzaga, or is being recruited by Gonzaga, but he was pretty much expected to be the #1 overall pick.

Hope for his sake it's not too serious.

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...cats-injures-knee-helped-court-florida-gators

You know if Montana State- Yellowstone campus had a basketball rich history you'd be all over it. They don't though, its a shame.

You shoud read the college prospects thread, I talk about a lot of other prospects than just Gonzaga's. I know my Zags talk gets your goat. But, they're a top 5 team Papa Daddio.
 
Montana State-Yellowstone? that would be a hard school to pay attention at, being that close to a SUPER VOLCANO!
 
Irrelevant to Olynyk's athletic ability.

I'm not saying he's not skilled, because he is, he just makes Chris Dudley look like a Gerald Green-like leaper.

Again, SHEESH!

:lol:
 
Irrelevant to Olynyk's athletic ability.

I'm not saying he's not skilled, because he is, he just makes Chris Dudley look like a Gerald Green-like leaper.

Again, SHEESH!

:lol:

About as relevant as Olynyk is to this thread.
 
You bit on PapaG's bait and the Olynyk clinic ensued into this thread.
 
The Olynyk Clinic is sweeping the nation and there's nothing Papa Daddio can do about it.

So he better just suck it up and bare with it.
 
IF, and this has a ton of qualifiers with it...IF for some reason he misses the rest of the season AND comes out in the draft (and it's a patella/ACL or whatever injury), and he was available at whatever spot Portland drafts, would you still take him?

Barring Muhammad being available (he's my personal favorite), I think it would be difficult to pass him up.

Am I a lunatic (in this regard I mean..I already know I am in every other aspect)?

I like this question a lot.

It'd make me sick to my stomach probably, but if he was available at 10 and the prognosis on his injury wasn't career threatening, then ... shit ... fuck ... damn.
No, I don't think I could make myself pull the trigger, but I'd probably instantly regret it.
 
proxy.jpg


This is one case where the age limit in the NBA screwed him over.
 
I don't know what these guys expect... they're rail thin and they're playing a sport that takes its toll on the body. In the case of Livingston, his knee just gave way. Couldn't take the pounding.
 
This is one case where the age limit in the NBA screwed him over.

I don't know if you can blame a freak occurrence on an age limit. It's not like the guy is injury prone like Oden. He could have just as easily hurt his knee the same way at Tilton.

Also, he doesn't have to come out this year. Honestly, he really isn't pro-ready. There are so many flaws with Nerlens' game that another year of college ball will only do him well.

Just remember that the age limit is entirely an NBA construction, and when you look at the end result of the rule, it's helped the NBA and hurt the NCAA.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if you can blame a freak occurrence on an age limit. It's not like the guy is injury prone like Oden. He could have just as easily hurt his knee the same way at Tilton.

Also, he doesn't have to come out this year. Honestly, he really isn't pro-ready. There are so many flaws with Nerlens' game that another year of college ball will only do him well.

Just remember that the age limit is entirely an NBA construction, and when you look at the end result of the rule, it's helped the NBA and hurt the NCAA.

Why do you think it's hurting the NCAA? Just curious.
 
Why do you think it's hurting the NCAA? Just curious.

Not sure if I'll make any sense at this hour. Most of the stuff I post at this time of night, I wind up regretting writing, but there are so many ways that the rule hurts the NCAA that I can probably drunkenly think of a few off the top of my head.

For example, the way that the ruling basically delegated the NCAA as a farm league has created a culture of "1-and-dones," hurts the overall recruiting process, and has resulted in hidden agendas, increased transfers, inflated egos, and a sloppier game in general.

Teams like Kentucky, who encourage the "1-and-dones," not only hurt the game with what they're doing to the recruiting landscape, but they also hurt the collegiate game by encouraging teams to play a more individualized style of offense, just to bring in the big recruits. Nowadays, no big time recruit wants to play in Bo Ryan's swing offense, or compete in Tom Izzo's war drills. They'd rather go to the team that treats them as a celebrity and runs an offense that's ISO-heavy, likes to break and play fast, and doesn't place an emphasis on the defensive end of the floor.

I also think a lot more of high school recruits are being hurt by this process than people realize. Even in 2001, it was usually only the "best of the best" recruits trying their hand by leaving early. There were a lot of guys who weren't ready and wound up being "busts," but those guys were the "elite" recruits of the time. Now that there's a "1-and-done" rule, it draws an unreasonable attention to the high school prospects, and that has not only a significant ripple effect on the collegiate game but it also affects the way that the prospects conduct their own recruitment. Now guys in the #15-25 recruit range are looking for schools that can make the "1-and-done," instead of looking for the right fit for them. As a result, you have a lot more inflated egos, a lot more transfers, and an overall headache for any coach that wants to recruit a top 25 recruit.

In a nutshell, it used to be that the recruit was grateful to be apart of a premier program, but now the mindset is that the premier program should be grateful for the recruit, and that can only hurt the collegiate game.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top