- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 26,226
- Likes
- 14,407
- Points
- 113
richard jefferson was acquired for nothing but expiring contracts. the deal to acquire him was much more lopsided than the one in which the lakers got gasol.
But Jefferson is a much worse player. It's not just a matter of what you give up, it's also about what you get back. While I don't think the Gasol deal was historically bad as some suggest, I do think it was lopsided. Gasol is a 22-25 PER player, a solid All-Star caliber player and near superstar, and the Lakers acquired him in his prime. Jefferson is broken down and barely an average player. Jefferson is reasonable to get for nothing more than expiring contracts. Gasol should cost more than some decent young talent and expirings.
