wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 25,124
- Likes
- 38,226
- Points
- 113
saw this RPI table at ESPN (Portland 5th):


if you look over to the right, the Blazers, at 17-10, are 3 wins ahead of their expected wins using some theorem that may or may not carry significant weight. That +3wins looks to be easily the best mark over the expectations in the NBA
Essentially, Portland was 7-5 before CJ and Nurkic went down and are 10-5 since. Obviously, that's not all Dame; Kanter has been much better as a starter than Nurkic was; RoCo is playing much better; Trent & Simons have been contributing filling in CJ's minutes. Melo has had 2 or 3 hot games. Even Giles, Little, and Ellerby have been contributing.
but the leader of the band has been Dame...again. I'm wondering: I've heard a lot about glue-guys over the years like Shane Battier and Tayshaun Prince, and the intangibles they bring. Is Dame the glue-guy for the Blazers and his leadership the biggest intangible Portland has had over the last 20 years?

if you look over to the right, the Blazers, at 17-10, are 3 wins ahead of their expected wins using some theorem that may or may not carry significant weight. That +3wins looks to be easily the best mark over the expectations in the NBA
Essentially, Portland was 7-5 before CJ and Nurkic went down and are 10-5 since. Obviously, that's not all Dame; Kanter has been much better as a starter than Nurkic was; RoCo is playing much better; Trent & Simons have been contributing filling in CJ's minutes. Melo has had 2 or 3 hot games. Even Giles, Little, and Ellerby have been contributing.
but the leader of the band has been Dame...again. I'm wondering: I've heard a lot about glue-guys over the years like Shane Battier and Tayshaun Prince, and the intangibles they bring. Is Dame the glue-guy for the Blazers and his leadership the biggest intangible Portland has had over the last 20 years?
