ucatchtrout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,461
- Likes
- 47
- Points
- 48
wow....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we had only done this with Bush in 2000 maybe we'd be a lot better off than we are today.What's stunning to me is the amount of energy and money that's being spent to bash the woman.
What's stunning to me is the amount of energy and money that's being spent to bash the woman.
What's stunning to me is the amount of energy and money that's being spent to bash the woman.
What's stunning to me is the amount of energy and money that's being spent to bash the woman.
If we had only done this with Bush in 2000 maybe we'd be a lot better off than we are today.
Besides, do you really want her as your PRESIDENT?
John McCain seems to think she is suitable to be our countries president.
Makes me wonder who he might find suitable to be on the supreme court, or any of the cabinet positions.
http://www.ilga.gov/
410 ILCS 70/7) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 87‑7)
Sec. 7. Charges and reimbursement.
(a) When any ambulance provider furnishes transportation, hospital provides hospital emergency services and forensic services, hospital or health care professional or laboratory provides follow‑up healthcare, or pharmacy dispenses prescribed medications to any sexual assault survivor, as defined by the Department of Healthcare and Family Services, who is neither eligible to receive such services under the Illinois Public Aid Code [my emphasis]NOR COVERED AS TO SUCH SERVICES BY A POLICY OF INSURANCE[/my emphasis] the ambulance provider, hospital, health care professional, or laboratory shall furnish such services to that person without charge and shall be entitled to be reimbursed for its billed charges in providing such services by the Illinois Sexual Assault Emergency Treatment Program under the Department of Healthcare and Family Services.
If we had only done this with Bush in 2000 maybe we'd be a lot better off than we are today.
Besides, do you really want her as your PRESIDENT?
John McCain seems to think she is suitable to be our countries president.
Makes me wonder who he might find suitable to be on the supreme court, or any of the cabinet positions.
Wow, Illinois charges for rape kits too!
I you have insurance in Illinois, YOUR INSURANCE IS CHARGED FOR THE RAPE KIT. Just like Chief Fannon said was his practice in Wasilla, *if* he couldn't charge the perp.
Derrrrrrr
Talking about how her administration charged rape victims for their own examinations is "bashing her"?
This same kind of shoddy "investigation" of Palin was done to Bush. They even sprung a 14 year old DUI on us 3 days before the election.
Couldn't Bush have avoided that by admitting to it up front?
barfo
Yep.
You suppose Obama could actually supply a birth certificate that is stamped and not just shown as an obvious fake on the internet.
I'm beginning to think he was born in Kenya. Why not come clean on it?
Yep.
You suppose Obama could actually supply a birth certificate that is stamped and not just shown as an obvious fake on the internet.
I'm beginning to think he was born in Kenya. Why not come clean on it?
Yeah, but what's worse. A president born in Kenya, or a president born in Russia? (and due to here D.O.B., she was born into the Soviet Union to be more specific).
Couldn't Bush have avoided that by admitting to it up front?
barfo
Huh? Sandpoint, Idaho was a part of the Soviet Union? What or who are you talking about?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/12/politics/uwire/main3823725.shtml
President Bush has dealt with drug issues as well. In addition to his open admission of alcohol abuse during his college years and a drunken driving arrest at the age of 30, Bush has also faced allegations of cocaine use.
But, unlike Obama, Bush has sidestepped the charges and remains obtuse on his history, calling his youth "irresponsible" and insisting he's made mistakes but offering no further details.
"As I understand it, the current (FBI background check) form asks the question, 'Did somebody use drugs within the last seven years?'" Bush said in a 1999 interview with the Dallas Morning News, "and I will be glad to answer that question, and the answer is 'No.'"
The Office of Personnel Management Questionaire for Public Trust Positions (which is what I think he is referring to) is slightly different. If I remember correctly, this form triggers an FBI background check without any further paperwork.
Question 21(a) reads, "In the last year, have you illegally used any controlled substance, for example, [blah blah blah]
Question 21(b) reads, In the last seven years, have you been involved in the illegal purchase, manufacture, trafficking, production, transfer, shipping receiving, or sale of any narcotic, stimulant, hallucinogen, or cannabis, for your own intended profit or that of another?"
Obviously, you could simply use an illegal drug without paying for it, and check the "no" box.