Politics Papadopoulos says that Trump personally encouraged him to arrange meeting with Putin

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

But there's no evidence of collusion. The house intel committee says so. And they should know, since they didn't interview PapaG.

barfo
 
Your boy Schiff is a liar.

Good luck with that.
 
Clinton lost. Get over it.

another weak comeback Denny. It's only temporary and hopefully the Republicans can come up with a decent candidate in 2020 as I have no party affiliation and only vote for who I think will be best. A con man is not the best choice no matter what party he is affiliated with. You should actually give it a try and think with your mind and not the name of the political party.
 
another weak comeback Denny. It's only temporary and hopefully the Republicans can come up with a decent candidate in 2020 as I have no party affiliation and only vote for who I think will be best. A con man is not the best choice no matter what party he is affiliated with. You should actually give it a try and think with your mind and not the name of the political party.

I can see you're not over it.

As far as I'm concerned, Trump won the election and he gets to run things as he sees fit.

Beat him at the ballot box. Whining about him isn't accomplishing a thing that's positive.
 
I can see you're not over it.

As far as I'm concerned, Trump won the election and he gets to run things as he sees fit.

Beat him at the ballot box. Whining about him isn't accomplishing a thing that's positive.

Are you like that Chatty Cathy doll that you pull the string and repeat 5 lines randomly over and over again?
 
Are you like that Chatty Cathy doll that you pull the string and repeat 5 lines randomly over and over again?

How's that Stormy Daniels thing working out for you?

Turned your news sources into the National Enquirer.
 
Clinton lost. Get over it.

Couple things:

I didn't vote for Clinton.
I would never vote for her.
I'm glad she lost.

Now, you mean to tell me that you're not concerned AT ALL about the Russia investigation?
 
Couple things:

I didn't vote for Clinton.
I would never vote for her.
I'm glad she lost.

Now, you mean to tell me that you're not concerned AT ALL about the Russia investigation?

Not concerned at all.

Looks like a weak excuse for blowing what should have been a slam dunk election.

From what I've seen, the interference (if it's true) was minuscule and had nowhere near the effect it's been blown up to be.
 
Not concerned at all.

Looks like a weak excuse for blowing what should have been a slam dunk election.

From what I've seen, the interference (if it's true) was minuscule and had nowhere near the effect it's been blown up to be.

Please tell me how you lose the popular vote and call it a "slam dunk".
 
Not concerned at all.

Looks like a weak excuse for blowing what should have been a slam dunk election.

From what I've seen, the interference (if it's true) was minuscule and had nowhere near the effect it's been blown up to be.

Cognitive dissonance.
 
It was clear from the first time he was mentioned that papa g is an FBI or CIA operative planted in the Trump campaign to create connections and appearances of criminality. Another huge fail by the deep state as his ONLY connection is with a crooked AUSSIE Clinton Foundation donor who has been exposed as a primary conspirator in pushing the fake GPS dossier.
 
It was clear from the first time he was mentioned that papa g is an FBI or CIA operative planted in the Trump campaign to create connections and appearances of criminality. Another huge fail by the deep state as his ONLY connection is with a crooked AUSSIE Clinton Foundation donor who has been exposed as a primary conspirator in pushing the fake GPS dossier.


Uh, he was just a coffee boy is what we have been told by Washington.
 
I don't watch Faux News, unless it's 24/7 CNN (which is Faux News).

People who've been watching too much Faux News don't even realize that Fox News is the real Faux News. Many of them live in a fantasy world which they use to interpret their news as the fantasy news that they want to believe.

Meanwhile, others who have their feet on the ground stick with reliable sources such as ones with multiple Pulitzer prizes.
 
Are you like that Chatty Cathy doll that you pull the string and repeat 5 lines randomly over and over again?

My Solid State Devices professor in college invented and held the patent to the method the doll used to talk, Professor Looney (no, I'm not making that up).
 
Not concerned at all.

Looks like a weak excuse for blowing what should have been a slam dunk election.

From what I've seen, the interference (if it's true) was minuscule and had nowhere near the effect it's been blown up to be.

Okay, she didn't do as well as she expected, she only won the popular vote by 3 Million.
 
Please tell me how you lose the popular vote and call it a "slam dunk".

It was Clinton's slam dunk win. She bricked it, to say the least.

Her apologist sycophants like to say the election turned on 150,000 votes. It really turned on millions because in states she lost, she should have won big. But logic isn't one of their stronger suits.
 
People who've been watching too much Faux News don't even realize that Fox News is the real Faux News. Many of them live in a fantasy world which they use to interpret their news as the fantasy news that they want to believe.

Meanwhile, others who have their feet on the ground stick with reliable sources such as ones with multiple Pulitzer prizes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
 
Back
Top