- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,114
- Likes
- 10,945
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you are correct with this post. I too think it was intentional. I also think they just went too far. I am not a particularly offended individual in general, but I would have been irked if I had to sit on those seats and travel on that train. I would not have taken the time to complain, but I would have been glad to see the sing removed. If the same imagery were used in a conventional movie poster hung on the trains, I would have not minded one bit.See, I don't think it's so much the images. I think it was the ridiculous extent that they went to cover the entire car in advertising. I think if it was JUST a couple posters, people would have tuned it out or let it go, but they covered every bench in flags and images. I think they overwhelmed people with imagery and that was their mistake. The benches were too much. The posters would have probably been fine.
With that said, I think they did it intentionally. I think they meant to piss people off.
Users accused both Amazon and the MTA of promoting Nazi ideology and anti-Semitic feelings with the ad campaign.
I agree with this.The MTA allowed the ads. That's the right thing.
Amazon pulled the ads after people complained. That's the right thing.
Free speech works.
If it were up to me, Amazon wouldn't have to take down the ads, but could if they wanted to.
Amazon took down the ads for good reason. Free speech in action. They spoke, the people spoke.
that is a part of free speech that people seem to gloss over very often.
Yeah, they have the right to say it, but people have the right to react to it. All the 1st amendment does is protect you from the government, not your fellow man (idiot or not).
