Podesta emails.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

blue32

Who wants a mustache ride?
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
8,613
Likes
2,102
Points
113
Does this make a difference for any of you die hard Hillary fans?


WikiLeaks exposes media's secret support of Clinton
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ks-exposes-medias-secret-support-clinton.html

CNN Contributor now a member of the DNC; getting heads up about debate questions, etc.

Clinton bashes Trump over Russia praise, but emails show she praised Putin
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...sia-praise-but-emails-show-praised-putin.html


Two faced liar? Public face vs private face?

Clinton campaign spokeswoman takes shots at Catholics, evangelicals in leaked email exchange
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...cs-evangelicals-in-leaked-email-exchange.html


How much more will we learn in the coming days of her corrupt political bullshit race?
 
Not relevant, it's not critical of Trump and hurts the liar's chances of being elected. Better to report on it after the election otherwise it would undo the media's hard work at getting her elected.
 
Not relevant, it's not critical of Trump and hurts the liar's chances of being elected. Better to report on it after the election otherwise it would undo the media's hard work at getting her elected.
For a guy who says he's not voting for Donald, or supporting him, you sure do defend him a lot.

Btw, Donald is losing because of Donald, no one else.

paid for by @SlyPokerDog
 
For a guy who says he's not voting for Donald, or supporting him, you sure do defend him a lot.

Btw, Donald is losing because of Donald, no one else.

paid for by @SlyPokerDog
Let me correct that idiotic post. Donald is a piece of shit because of Donald. Donald is losing to the other piece of shit partly because of that.

Living in denial of the fact that the media is all in for Hillary is unbelievable.
 
For a guy who says he's not voting for Donald, or supporting him, you sure do defend him a lot.

Btw, Donald is losing because of Donald, no one else.

paid for by @SlyPokerDog

What have I posted that's pro Trump?

The media is a disgrace. Clinton is a criminal.

I didn't mention Trump, did I?
 
Let me correct that idiotic post. Donald is a piece of shit because of Donald. Donald is losing to the other piece of shit partly because of that.

Living in denial of the fact that the media is all in for Hillary is unbelievable.

"all in"?

Is it the medias fault that Donald trips over his child sized hands at almost every turn? They report on what creates viewers.

The "media is biased" towards her is lazy thinking.
 
"all in"?

Is it the medias fault that Donald trips over his child sized hands at almost every turn? They report on what creates viewers.

The "media is biased" towards her is lazy thinking.
Delusionidial postioitis

I'm going to add multiple words and phrases to the lexicon during the remainder of this election.

The best part is how you contradict yourself in the span of two sentences.

It isn't the medias fault, they just want to "create viewers"
 
"all in"?

Is it the medias fault that Donald trips over his child sized hands at almost every turn? They report on what creates viewers.

The "media is biased" towards her is lazy thinking.
They're not reporting on what creates viewers. CNN has fallen behind even MSNBC due to it's lopsided coverage.

Their agenda is to drive up Trump's unfavorables while shining on the liar's and repeating that campaign's talking points.

I don't care if Trump loses or says idiotic things and those get covered. But it is only fair to cover the WikiLeaks revelations about the liar's criminality and with equal zeal.

Propaganda is huge. Otherwise the candidates wouldn't buy air time for ads. What the media is doing is providing the liar 24/7 free air time and composing their own ads on her behalf.
 
They're not reporting on what creates viewers. CNN has fallen behind even MSNBC due to it's lopsided coverage.

Their agenda is to drive up Trump's unfavorables while shining on the liar's and repeating that campaign's talking points.

I don't care if Trump loses or says idiotic things and those get covered. But it is only fair to cover the WikiLeaks revelations about the liar's criminality and with equal zeal.

Propaganda is huge. Otherwise the candidates wouldn't buy air time for ads. What the media is doing is providing the liar 24/7 free air time and composing their own ads on her behalf.
Nu uh. All those years you pretended to be pro immigrant was all a front for your love of Donald Trump.

Everyone knows.

Fuck, I never use green font but I would for this.
 
Leaked Emails Indicate Clinton Considered Worst Campaign Slogans in History

In one 2014 email exchange with top Clinton aides, Roy Spence, a longtime friend and ad maker for Mrs. Clinton, sent over possible slogans to sum up her candidacy.

“Neither change nor continuity but The different way. The new way,” Mr. Spence wrote. He went on: “She champions with clear vision and grit. We will build not the partisans ships. But rather the Ship of State flying the American Dream flag.”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat..._s_hillary_clinton_slogans_not_great_bob.html
 
Nu uh. All those years you pretended to be pro immigrant was all a front for your love of Donald Trump.

Everyone knows.

Fuck, I never use green font but I would for this.
I am most definitely for open borders. The wall thing alone is the first of many reasons I won't vote for Trump.
 
Does this make a difference for any of you die hard Hillary fans?

Well, let's see...

WikiLeaks exposes media's secret support of Clinton
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ks-exposes-medias-secret-support-clinton.html

CNN Contributor now a member of the DNC; getting heads up about debate questions, etc.

I'm relying on your summary here on this one - there's nothing untoward about Donna Brazille first working for CNN, then working for the DNC. People are allowed to change jobs.
Corey Lewandowski worked for Trump, now works for CNN. Is that also a problem for you?

The debate question thing is unclear (whether it actually happened). If it did happen, then obviously that's a problem. Everyone denies it did, though, and says that this is confusing debate questions with TV discussion panel questions.

Clinton bashes Trump over Russia praise, but emails show she praised Putin
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...sia-praise-but-emails-show-praised-putin.html


Two faced liar? Public face vs private face?

Actually that whole article is pretty interesting, but I don't see anything to object to. Why shouldn't she take a different approach to Putin in public than in private? Being a politician and a diplomat - the job does in fact involve being two-faced, and that's not a bad thing. You really think our leaders should just tell Russia everything they think and do, unfiltered?

Clinton campaign spokeswoman takes shots at Catholics, evangelicals in leaked email exchange
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...cs-evangelicals-in-leaked-email-exchange.html


How much more will we learn in the coming days of her corrupt political bullshit race?

I have a hard time understanding exactly what Palmieri was trying to say here, but even if she was saying Catholics suck, I don't see that as being a huge scandal. A small scandal, sure. But she's not the candidate.

Overall, these leaks have been interesting for sure, but there is a definite lack of smoking guns here so far.

barfo
 
In another case, Donna Brazile, then a CNN contributor but now acting head of the Democratic National Committee, emailed members of the Clinton campaign to tip them off about a question that would be asked at Clinton’s debate with Bernie Sanders, her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.​

"From time to time I get the questions in advance," read the subject line of an alleged email in which Brazile told members of the Clinton campaign to be ready for a question on the death penalty.​

In a statement released Tuesday afternoon, Brazile denied leaking questions.​

Deny, deny, deny. Not at all what you describe barfo.
 
I really wish the media would investigate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0


Donald J. Trump was emphatic in the second presidential debate: Yes, he had boasted about kissing women without permission and grabbing their genitals. But he had never actually done those things, he said.​

“No,” he declared under questioning on Sunday evening, “I have not.”​

At that moment, sitting at home in Manhattan, Jessica Leeds, 74, felt he was lying to her face. “I wanted to punch the screen,” she said in an interview in her apartment.​

More than three decades ago, when she was a traveling businesswoman at a paper company, Ms. Leeds said, she sat beside Mr. Trump in the first-class cabin of a flight to New York. They had never met before.​

About 45 minutes after takeoff, she recalled, Mr. Trump lifted the armrest and began to touch her.
It turns out the armrests do not go up/down in first class.

NEW_masterimg_e175_1.jpg


3a12412791ccf984c6865a2f84b505f5.jpg


How about verifying any of these stories? Flight manifest showing the two were on the same plane at the time?
 
I really wish the media would investigate.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0


Donald J. Trump was emphatic in the second presidential debate: Yes, he had boasted about kissing women without permission and grabbing their genitals. But he had never actually done those things, he said.​

“No,” he declared under questioning on Sunday evening, “I have not.”​

At that moment, sitting at home in Manhattan, Jessica Leeds, 74, felt he was lying to her face. “I wanted to punch the screen,” she said in an interview in her apartment.​

More than three decades ago, when she was a traveling businesswoman at a paper company, Ms. Leeds said, she sat beside Mr. Trump in the first-class cabin of a flight to New York. They had never met before.​

About 45 minutes after takeoff, she recalled, Mr. Trump lifted the armrest and began to touch her.
It turns out the armrests do not go up/down in first class.

NEW_masterimg_e175_1.jpg


3a12412791ccf984c6865a2f84b505f5.jpg


How about verifying any of these stories? Flight manifest showing the two were on the same plane at the time?


Why would they investigate anything when they have people like Barfo eating up all the bullshit! :)
 
I really wish the media would investigate.

It turns out the armrests do not go up/down in first class.

NEW_masterimg_e175_1.jpg

Denny, are you Katrina Pierson? Or do you just think she's really really smart?

On Wednesday Katrina Pierson, Trump’s campaign spokeswoman, said what Leeds alleged could never have happened. Why? “The first-class seats have fixed armrests so what I can tell you about her story, if she was groped on a plane, it wasn’t by Donald Trump and it certainly wasn’t in first class,” she told a CNN host.

Jon Ostrower, CNN’s aviation editor, began doing some digging. Today he tweeted photos of seats on various models of plane he said were from US airlines in the 1970s and 1980s, showing moveable armrests:

barfo
 
Denny, are you Katrina Pierson? Or do you just think she's really really smart?



barfo
Nah.

Just fact checking the media for those who don't care to. Figured this out on my own from reading the NYTimes article and seeing her on CNN.

What the media is doing is quite apparent. If you dig a little into what they're declaring as truth, it's not truth.

They continue to report that Trump is lying when he says he was against the invasion of Iraq. They base it on a half-hearted "I guess so" comment on the Stern show and completely ignore the 2003 (prior to invasion) interview on Fox Business where he said we shouldn't rush into it and should wait for the UN to join in. There's no other way to say it but the media is outright lying.
 
In another case, Donna Brazile, then a CNN contributor but now acting head of the Democratic National Committee, emailed members of the Clinton campaign to tip them off about a question that would be asked at Clinton’s debate with Bernie Sanders, her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination.​

"From time to time I get the questions in advance," read the subject line of an alleged email in which Brazile told members of the Clinton campaign to be ready for a question on the death penalty.​

In a statement released Tuesday afternoon, Brazile denied leaking questions.​

Deny, deny, deny. Not at all what you describe barfo.

I will note that the campaign's response to that email was along the lines of "yes, we can share her position on the death penalty with you". Not "hey, thanks for the hot tip!".

barfo
 
Nah.

Just fact checking the media for those who don't care to. Figured this out on my own from reading the NYTimes article and seeing her on CNN.

You figured that out on your own by seeing Katrina say it? My, that's impressive.

Here's a tip: Katrina Pierson is an idiot.

What the media is doing is quite apparent. If you dig a little into what they're declaring as truth, it's not truth.

They continue to report that Trump is lying when he says he was against the invasion of Iraq. They base it on a half-hearted "I guess so" comment on the Stern show and completely ignore the 2003 (prior to invasion) interview on Fox Business where he said we shouldn't rush into it and should wait for the UN to join in. There's no other way to say it but the media is outright lying.

Actually, there are plenty of other ways to say it.

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top