Pop Doesnt Give a F___!!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Had he sat one p[layer each game rather than play all 3 then sit all 3 there would have been no problem at all. Pop is deliberately grandstanding to gain attention either for the Spurs or himself. It's true the Spurs don't really get much press for such a successful team. Maybe Pops is campaigning for Sterm's job.
 
Or as we already know Stern loves the Lakers but I'm surprised he was part of the sanctions then? (down below).
The Los Angeles Lakers were known to have been fined in the later stages of the 1984-85 and 1989-90 seasons for resting stars before the playoffs.
I can understand the playoffs but before regular season games especially when the Spurs just finished their 17th game?
Plus this is the 82 game schedule not the 66 game season that we had last year. So don't players have longer periods of rest besides long road trips?
Why didn't Pop just play his 4 best players for 5 minutes each and then bench them?
 
Why didn't Pop just play his 4 best players for 5 minutes each and then bench them?

Good point. Next time TNT negotiates the NBA contract, it will discount for decreased ratings from national audience fatigue from the occasional bait and switch. Unless Stern puts a stop to it.
 
the next time Joey Crawford gets my star player into early foul trouble I'm going to complain!! I paid good money to see healthy players play the game!!
 
Random thoughts:

My first instinct is that Pop's the fucking coach and he knows what's good for his players (and Tim Duncan's incredible play this season is evidence for the success of his policies).
BUT: there is something to the idea that he could rest the starters incrementally.
BUT BUT: why not get it over with and not disrupt the chemistry? And it's not like he didn't care about the game - they nearly won, for fuck's sake. And the other team can't really complain - they WANT to win. They get rewards for wins. Where are the fines for teams that tank for the lottery?

The analogy with a rock band (thank you Brian Schmitz) is totally asinine. Bands aren't teams - they don't have a bench. And bands don't have to tour - they can take years out if they want. And, apart from the singer with his or her voice, there's not much wear-and-tear. Bands don't have a biologically determined window on their ability to earn money doing what they do (although, looking at the Stones, it would be better if they did).

If the analogy WAS a good one, and bands were FORCED to tour by their record company then I would be on the side of any manager that canceled dates for the good of the health of the band and to extend their careers.
 
I don't like Stern's take on this one. As long as someone has to pay regular season prices for a preseason game, I don't want to hear anyone say "oh, I was expecting to see stars for my hard-earned money. That's not fair!"

IF, maybe, this was Pop doing this in San Antonio for the home crowd, I'd have a small problem with it. Pop doesn't owe a thing to the MIA ticket-holders. He owes it to the ownership of the team (and, tangentially, to the fans of the team) to try to win a championship. If he chooses to keep his older players away from injury by not playing a good team on the last night of a 4-in-5 road trip that they have a poor chance of winning anyway, that's his call (or, his GM's and owner's call). And if they're not playing, why NOT send them home early for a night with the wife and kiddos? And if Stern doesn't want this happening, don't schedule 4 road games in 5 nights. Problem solved.
 
I'm curious to see what the sanctions will be. They can't take away draft picks, right? Maybe some fines, but anything more would be stupid on Stern's part.
 
Well for all of you that do not like David Stern including myself I do have to say this, If it was not for Stern the NBA most likely would not be where it is today if at all. Before Stern came the NBA was really really struggling.
 
Had he sat one p[layer each game rather than play all 3 then sit all 3 there would have been no problem at all. Pop is deliberately grandstanding to gain attention either for the Spurs or himself. I

Then he'd be coaching 3 games slightly undermanned, and have three games with greater chances of losing, instead of one game while significantly undermanned.
 
This won't help..

Spurs%20Joey%20Crawford%20%282%29.jpg
 
"A coach acted in the best interests of his team? Outrageous! Next the filthy peons will expect even-handed officiating."
 
With intentions and implications aside, how can you fine someone for a coaching decision?

What's next, fining the Lakers for playing Dwight in the stretch?

Ridiculous.
 
This is one step closer to fans suing teams for playing badly and getting blown out.
 
The class action lawsuit for the People of Cleveland against LeBron James begins in 3... 2...

That would be awesome!!!!! I mean think about it? What if certain business or groups bought luxury season boxes and advertised because they had a winning organization. Now that LJ left; the value of their advertisment and box seats diminished. The Cavs went from contender to bottom feeder in one season.
 
That would be awesome!!!!! I mean think about it? What if certain business or groups bought luxury season boxes and advertised because they had a winning organization. Now that LJ left; the value of their advertisment and box seats diminished. The Cavs went from contender to bottom feeder in one season.
That's why Stern got them Kyrie a year later. Similar to how he got NO Anthony Davis a year after CP was traded. There is a method to his madness.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top