Production from starters

[Rastapopoulos]

I have a brilliant idea, how about writing down a list of who we beat in that stretch and tell us convincingly that we should view that as impressive.

How about you convince me that we could beat the same group with Martell starting over Miller? I'm having increasing difficulty in seeing us beating anybody. The days when we complain about a victory over a weak opponent are over.

 

[hasoos]

Then what MIXUM? Who do you trade? Getting a SF that would make a large enough impact to make a significant enough impact this year would require trading too much, and then once Batum comes back you have 2 starting SF's. Batum if given the PT would be averaging 10ppg for us this season IMO.

The only trade that makes sense IMO would be trading Blake for another warm body to help in the post, but I'm not convinced that what we could get would be much better than Pendergraph when he comes back.

So do we trade Miller? Then we have rolled the dice on Bayless to be our PG and/or resigning Blake which at this point in time doesn't look like something I would feel comfortable in relying on.

If you could trade Webster and Blake for a 3/4 then Maybe we could make a trade, but we aren't going to get a Butler or Wallace for that.

We don't necessarily have to trade for a star. IMO any average SF would be better than a guy shooting about .350 from the floor. Fuck man. Even Chase Budinger who was drafted in the 2nd round by Houston last year is playing better than our starting SF.

 

[Schilly]

How about you convince me that we could beat the same group with Martell starting over Miller? I'm having increasing difficulty in seeing us beating anybody. The days when we complain about a victory over a weak opponent are over.

I agree. THough statistically Webster is better than Blake except for assists.

 

[hasoos]

I agree. THough statistically Webster is better than Blake except for assists.

Stink=Stink