OT Question for all you Punish the Russian heros. (1 Viewer)

[MarAzul]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

 

[lawai'a]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

the twelve russians weren't found by mueller or the russian investigation at all. the were outed by our intelligence agencies. sorry.

 

[Natebishop3]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

I think in the age of the internet, tampering and manipulation of our voting process is a valid concern and something that we should be preparing for. People are not discerning about information on the internet. It's very easy to release a rumor or false story and watch the ripples expand. I have seen this from both the Republicans and the Democrats. They don't fact check. They just see the headline and freak out. This has made our country extremely vulnerable to manipulation. The internet is a double edged sword unfortunately.

 

[julius]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

I wonder how you actually feel, since we all know this is not how you (the person behind the screen name/avatar) feels.

You've put on quite a caricature of a blinded simpleton tho.

 

[MarAzul]

sorry

Sorry for what?
By the way, what was your job in making war on the Russians?

 

[julius]

I wonder how you actually feel, since we all know this is not how you (the person behind the screen name/avatar) feels.

You've put on quite a caricature of a blinded simpleton tho.

disregard this post. I thought this was done by another poster and not MarAzul.

 

[MarAzul]

This has made our country extremely vulnerable to manipulation. The internet is a double edged sword unfortunately.

Sound like an education issue at home. Hardly calls for hostile confrontations.

 

[MarAzul]

You've put on quite a caricature of a blinded simpleton tho

Yes yes.
And your roll in making war on the Russians was?

 

[julius]

Yes yes.
And your roll in making war on the Russians was?

see my above post below this above post.

 

[lawai'a]

Sorry for what?
By the way, what was your job in making war on the Russians?

that your premise that mueller! is responsible for outing russia. the fact that the cia, nsa, and fbi have stated that they have irrefutable evidence that russia was responsible for meddling in our election. sorry mueller! is not the one.

 

[MarAzul]

sorry mueller! is not the one.

Ok, perhaps I miss understood Rosenstein. The issues are still the same.

 

[lawai'a]

Ok, perhaps I must understood Rosenstein. The issues are still the same.

whoosh!!!!!

 

[MarAzul]

whoosh!!!!!

Yes, well your roll in warring on Russia?

 

[lawai'a]

would the attempt to circumvent our elections be considered an act of war? serious question. accusing russians of spying and malfeasance has been going on way to long to view this as a declaration of war. certainly not the first time russians have been indicted even.

 

[CupWizier]

Russians great. FBI and Democrats bad.

Make America Russian

 

[MarAzul]

would the attempt to circumvent our elections be considered an act of war?

I guess it could if we wanted that out come. It would be a hell of a lot more convincing than the bull shit dreamed up for Vietnam. The gulf of Tonkin incident.
Is war with Russia what you want?

 

[riverman]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

you're sensationalizing again Marz….it's nothing to do with shaming from an election loss...it's damage control from and exposed cyber intervention into our democratic process...guess you didn't see Putin's new map of his improved nukes destroying Florida....and I have not read one single post on this forum asking for war against Russia.....there's a difference between national security from foreign intervention and armed conflict..you should know this...quite frightening though that your guy Trump keeps gushing about what a great guy Putin is...check out Putin's assassination record of adversaries....you're looking for heroes? Try the guys who catch the spys...not the soldiers at home standing a post. Maybe you like Russian interference....and don't like virtous actions against aggressive interventions...who knows..I feel better with our analysts keeping Putin in check than turning a blind eye to what has become obviously a sophisticated intervention into our process at home...the question here is why aren't you concerned? Baffles the mind. Or maybe you just want to fly a deplorable flag and fart in the direction of Trump detractors....I think the latter is probably the case....

 

[riverman]

Yes, well your roll in warring on Russia?

and your role in defending Russia?

 

[MarAzul]

fart in the direction of Trump detractors.

Good one man!
It beats the hell out of warfare.

 

[barfo]

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.

What is the relevance of your question?

barfo

 

[lawai'a]

fodder for your questions, the cia while Pompeo was head, issued a statement accusing russia of interfering. he is now the sec. of state.

I guess it could if we wanted that out come. It would be a hell of a lot more convincing than the bull shit dreamed up for Vietnam. The gulf of Tonkin incident.
Is war with Russia what you want?

not at this time but i would offer the premise that we are in a defacto cyber war at this time.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

Good one man!
It beats the hell out of warfare.

I've said it before and I'll try and make it short and sweet.

The FBI and CIA and whatever other covert agencies we don't even know exist have known everything the Trump campaign and the Russians did the moment they did it.

They're reverse engineering this case to cover their spying.

So, maybe war with Russia is the goal while we have an ace up our sleeve.

 

[julius]

What is the relevance of your question?

barfo

 

[lawai'a]

I've said it before and I'll try and make it short and sweet.

The FBI and CIA and whatever other covert agencies we don't even know exist have known everything the Trump campaign and the Russians did the moment they did it.

They're reverse engineering this case to cover their spying.

So, maybe war with Russia is the goal while we have an ace up our sleeve.

i doubt very seriously that this is the case. our president would never have been allowed to take the oath of office if this were truly the case. the president would never allow it to happen.edit(it=war) he continues to be the greatest and loudest putin apologist in the free world.

 

[riverman]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7121d1659514
arms races always make money for fat cats......Trump and Putin have bloated the military and escalated weapons development. but hey.....it's just citizens who are miffed at elections? right...

 

[calvin natt]

Trumpy:
"My people came to me (Dir of National Intelligence) Dan Coats came to me, some others, they said they think its Russia. I have President Putin. He just said its not Russia. I will say this, I don't see any reason why it would be".

Well that settles it!

Also - OJ said he didn't kill anyone.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

i doubt very seriously that this is the case. our president would never have been allowed to take the oath of office if this were truly the case. the president would never allow it to happen.edit(it=war) he continues to be the greatest and loudest putin apologist in the free world.

I don't think Trump DID anything. His campaign dirtballs? Sure.

Remember Clapper lying to us all?

They knew.

 

[riverman]

Trumpy:
"My people came to me (Dir of National Intelligence) Dan Coats came to me, some others, they said they think its Russia. I have President Putin. He just said its not Russia. I will say this, I don't see any reason why it would be".

Well that settles it!

Also - OJ said he didn't kill anyone.

When it comes to a chess match...Trump is no match for Putin...Trump has said exactly the same line with every world leader he meets with...it's what good friends we are...how great our relationship is and how good things are happening...classic denial...when it comes to diplomacy Trump is a one trick pony...he still talks about the election in every speech...his war is with American institutions ...he'd rather chastise the media than N Korea or Russia..now he wants to have a summit with the Taliban...

 

[calvin natt]

its pretty amazing.

friend Putin
enemy CIA, FBI, Media.

And by no means do I think the media is always fair and forthright, but my god, its a dangerous game hes playing.

But hey! He owns the golf course in Scotland so who are we to question?

 

[Chris Craig]

You seem to be signalling the virtuous outrage over the perceived affront of Russian shaming you with a loss in the last election.

Sort of ridiculous actually, Clinton was the worst candidates in the last 150 years. The Russians may have help reveal this truth, but no way did they help a deplorable make up his/her mind, not to vote for her.

You point to 12 Russians found by the hero Mueller! Guess what? They are not subject to the US legal system.
They are outside the territory of the sovereign jurisdiction area. That makes it a diplomatic issue with
warfare as the final enforcement tool. A US assistant AG making big noise over this is strange to me,
as it would rightfully be an issue for the State Department to handle if handled at all. I suspect the hair on fire people as well as the ridiculous special counsel being the apparent discoverers, has spun this out of control.

But for all you punish the Russians fans, let me ask you, What was your job in pressing War on Russia
the last time we came within a blink of going for broke?

I can tell you mine, but I am interested in hearing yours.