Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,242
- Likes
- 57,506
- Points
- 113
So it seems like the accusation was that the refs (Tony Brothers hahahahah) looked at the replay, saw that a foul should have been called, and said that the ball went off the Clippers.
So my question is, do you think the refs should ignore something obvious that they see in the replay, or do they do what they've been doing as long as I remember, and that's call a makeup call. NBA refs are notorious for makeup calls.
Honestly, if the rules are that they can only review who the ball went off of, and the ball obviously went off OKC, the ball should go to the Clippers. I can't even say how many times I've seen the refs get it wrong after watching a fucking replay. OBVIOUS replays that show the ball went off a player, and the refs still get it wrong. I don't think I've ever seen such horrible refereeing.
This, in my opinion, just proves that the NBA is crooked. No other league seems to have this much trouble with utilizing replay. They're watching a fucking replay from a myriad of angles and they still get it wrong.
So my question is, do you think the refs should ignore something obvious that they see in the replay, or do they do what they've been doing as long as I remember, and that's call a makeup call. NBA refs are notorious for makeup calls.
Honestly, if the rules are that they can only review who the ball went off of, and the ball obviously went off OKC, the ball should go to the Clippers. I can't even say how many times I've seen the refs get it wrong after watching a fucking replay. OBVIOUS replays that show the ball went off a player, and the refs still get it wrong. I don't think I've ever seen such horrible refereeing.
This, in my opinion, just proves that the NBA is crooked. No other league seems to have this much trouble with utilizing replay. They're watching a fucking replay from a myriad of angles and they still get it wrong.

