Further
Guy
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 11,099
- Likes
- 4,039
- Points
- 113
This is just a strategy question. Against GS right before the half, Blake passed the ball to Rudy on a fast break and Rudy was a good 12 feet ahead of the first GS player for a wide open layup. But instead of taking the layup himself, he slowed down to let Outlaw catch up, toss the ball to Outlaw who slammed it for a wicked dunk.
The play worked out great, Outlaw made the slam and it was a thunderous one. But the question still remains, was that the right move by Rudy? It was a generous move by Rudy, and he rewarded Outlaw for running the court, but things could have gone wrong. Outlaw has missed many slams in the past. the defender, who was also catching up could have fouled Outlaw to make him earn the points at the stripe. If Rudy had taken the layup, and missed, Outlaw would have been in position to slam in down the miss, but if Outlaw missed, the GS defenders would have been contending for that rebound.
So, did Rudy do the right thing?
The play worked out great, Outlaw made the slam and it was a thunderous one. But the question still remains, was that the right move by Rudy? It was a generous move by Rudy, and he rewarded Outlaw for running the court, but things could have gone wrong. Outlaw has missed many slams in the past. the defender, who was also catching up could have fouled Outlaw to make him earn the points at the stripe. If Rudy had taken the layup, and missed, Outlaw would have been in position to slam in down the miss, but if Outlaw missed, the GS defenders would have been contending for that rebound.
So, did Rudy do the right thing?


