Rudy

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

he had back spasams today so iono but he has been suckin it up a little bit
 
He's playing about 15 mpg so far.. I think for the pre-season we are trying to get Andre acclimated moreso than Rudy.
 
I think for our team to succeed he needs to play 25-30!
 
Last time Rudy got a good pass it was from Sergio.

So far Andre has minimized Roy and Rudy to the point where they may as well be selling drinks in the stands rather than on the court.

He needs to go before this team implodes.
 
Last time Rudy got a good pass it was from Sergio.

So far Andre has minimized Roy and Rudy to the point where they may as well be selling drinks in the stands rather than on the court.

He needs to go before this team implodes.

Seems like our problem is defense... We had plenty of scorers tonight.
 
Listen, Rudy is our best player, I'm not saying it just in the negative way - based on Roy's ability so far, but also in a good way - he's truly a great player.
I'm not saying Roy should go to the bench, I've suggested it once but since backed off from that idea, I do feel like we need our best players in the Starting unit, and the 2-3 would be best manned by Roy and Rudy.
As long as we have Rudy playing 9 minutes per, players will never respect coach's heirarchy, I think that even if Outlaw/Martell would lose 5 minutes per, but would feel they're in a more logical system, they'll accept the change.

This is the lineup as I see it:

Miller/Blake
Rudy/Webster/Bayless
Roy/Outlaw/Batum
Aldridge/?
?

Why I added a ? where the Centers should have been - because, and I should have mentioned it earlier, I'm still not sure who's our best center.
 
and you know what, I could replace the ? behind LA in the depth chart with Batum.
 
Listen, Rudy is our best player, I'm not saying it just in the negative way - based on Roy's ability so far, but also in a good way - he's truly a great player.
I'm not saying Roy should go to the bench, I've suggested it once but since backed off from that idea, I do feel like we need our best players in the Starting unit, and the 2-3 would be best manned by Roy and Rudy.
As long as we have Rudy playing 9 minutes per, players will never respect coach's heirarchy, I think that even if Outlaw/Martell would lose 5 minutes per, but would feel they're in a more logical system, they'll accept the change.

This is the lineup as I see it:

Miller/Blake
Rudy/Webster/Bayless
Roy/Outlaw/Batum
Aldridge/?
?

Why I added a ? where the Centers should have been - because, and I should have mentioned it earlier, I'm still not sure who's our best center.

You lost me when you said "Rudy is our best player" - you have to be kidding. I like Rudy but he's at best our 4th or 5th best player - at best.
 
I'm sorry I lost you cause my main idea wasn't that Rudy is our best player but that he's best suited to be B-Roy's "other swingman". And I also still think he's our best player.
 
I'm sorry I lost you cause my main idea wasn't that Rudy is our best player but that he's best suited to be B-Roy's "other swingman". And I also still think he's our best player.

I'm starting to come around to the idea of Roy/Rudy starting together at the 2/3 spots...but seriously dude, saying that Rudy is a better player than Roy seriously undermines any credibility one can have on an anonymous message board. Rudy's PER was barely average last year--against reserves--and his defense was far below. By what measure could he possibly be better than Roy?
 
But even if he's not as good as Roy, it's not a good thing having your two best players playing the same position.
 
Last time Rudy got a good pass it was from Sergio.

So far Andre has minimized Roy and Rudy to the point where they may as well be selling drinks in the stands rather than on the court.

He needs to go before this team implodes.

So Andre Miller has one good game and now he is minimized Roy and Rudy. Aaah I see. Your basketball wisdom is once again, way beyond everybody else's. That must be what happens when your favorite player plays so well, they get relegated to the worse team in the league.
 
But even if he's not as good as Roy, it's not a good thing having your two best players playing the same position.

You did catch my first sentence, right? However, I think it's a stretch to call Rudy our second-best player--above Aldridge, Oden, and Miller, all of whom I think are better. In fact, it's debatable whether Rudy is even our second-best swingman.

I mean, exactly what is the difference between Rudy and Martell? Rudy's a better passer, and Martell's a better defender? Martell seems to be having a better pre-season so far, and it's not as though there was a huge disparity in numbers between the last full season for each. And of course, let's not discount Nic--clearly a superior defender (though 4 years younger) and apparently ready to expand his offensive game this year. IMO, he's got a brighter future than Rudy, and may well be better this year.

So yes, while I think there's some merit to the "should Rudy start" discussion, elevating him to "[one of our] two best players" status seems more than a bit premature.
 
I
L
I
K
E
W
R
I
T
I
N
G
L
I
K
E
T
H
I
S
!
I
T
H
I
N
K
I
W
I
L
L
D
O
T
H
I
S
T
H
E
R
E
S
T
O
F
T
H
E
D
A
Y
!
 
Aldridge is/was our 2nd best player statistics-wise mostly because he wasn't playing behind Brandon Roy. If I was a GM of another team and was offered either Lamarcus or Rudy for one of my players I would take Rudy.
 
Aldridge is/was our 2nd best player statistics-wise mostly because he wasn't playing behind Brandon Roy. If I was a GM of another team and was offered either Lamarcus or Rudy for one of my players I would take Rudy.

Well, you'd probably be looking for a new job shortly thereafter.

There is nothing you can show me from 82games.com, basketball-reference.com, ESPN.com, nor any other objective measure wherein Rudy is a better player (either offensively or defensively) than LaMarcus Aldridge ... Rudy got plenty of touches and minutes last year so the "not enough PT" argument is bunk.
 
I remember more games in which Rudy was awesome and more awesome plays made by Rudy than by Lamarcus, so he might not be a better player stats-wise but he's a much better player awesomeness-wise.
 
I remember more games in which Rudy was awesome and more awesome plays made by Rudy than by Lamarcus, so he might not be a better player stats-wise but he's a much better player awesomeness-wise.

You probably didn't mean for this to be hilarious, but laughed my ass off.
 
Awesome%5B1%5D.jpg
 
Rudy is an exciting player that is a very important piece to our puzzle........ BUT.......... I would say he is about our 4th or 5th best player.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top