KingSpeed Veteran Joined Sep 27, 2008 Messages 63,453 Likes 22,640 Points 113 Dec 25, 2010 #1 Joel is out. Camby and Cunningham are questionable. That means Marks has to start, right? Or play 4 guards with Aldridge? Or start Babbitt? I can't wait.
Joel is out. Camby and Cunningham are questionable. That means Marks has to start, right? Or play 4 guards with Aldridge? Or start Babbitt? I can't wait.
illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1 Joined Sep 16, 2008 Messages 57,785 Likes 56,305 Points 113 Dec 25, 2010 #2 Against GSW, we can get away with starting Nic @ PF (especially when Biedrins isn't playing, and David Lee is their C).
Against GSW, we can get away with starting Nic @ PF (especially when Biedrins isn't playing, and David Lee is their C).
Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo Joined Sep 23, 2008 Messages 44,969 Likes 27,867 Points 113 Dec 25, 2010 #3 Hopefully Cho and co. are still analyzing and evaluating whether to use our exceptions. No need to rush
Hopefully Cho and co. are still analyzing and evaluating whether to use our exceptions. No need to rush
Charcoal Filtered Writing Team Joined Aug 11, 2009 Messages 4,763 Likes 2,452 Points 113 Dec 25, 2010 #4 Mediocre Man said: Hopefully Cho and co. are still analyzing and evaluating whether to use our exceptions. No need to rush Click to expand... Is it really going to matter though? Whoever we get is only going to get injured. Look at we potentially could have tonight, only for them to be out with injuries: 1. Greg Oden 2. Jeff Pendergraph 3. Oberto 4. Camby 5. Joel 6. Dante
Mediocre Man said: Hopefully Cho and co. are still analyzing and evaluating whether to use our exceptions. No need to rush Click to expand... Is it really going to matter though? Whoever we get is only going to get injured. Look at we potentially could have tonight, only for them to be out with injuries: 1. Greg Oden 2. Jeff Pendergraph 3. Oberto 4. Camby 5. Joel 6. Dante