Seattle PD justified on tasering Pregnant woman

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Nate Dogg

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
3,118
Likes
21
Points
38
Heres the story. Way back in 2005.
Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Pregnant woman 'Tasered' by police is convicted

By HECTOR CASTRO
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

She was rushing her son to school. She was eight months pregnant. And she was about to get a speeding ticket she didn't think she deserved.

So when a Seattle police officer presented the ticket to Malaika Brooks, she refused to sign it. In the ensuing confrontation, she suffered burns from a police Taser, an electric stun device that delivers 50,000 volts.

"Probably the worst thing that ever happened to me," Brooks said, in describing that morning during her criminal trial last week on charges of refusing to obey an officer and resisting arrest.

She was found guilty of the first charge because she never signed the ticket, but the Seattle Municipal Court jury could not decide whether she resisted arrest, the reason the Taser was applied.

To her attorneys and critics of police use of Tasers, Brooks' case is an example of police overreaction.

"It's pretty extraordinary that they should have used a Taser in this case," said Lisa Daugaard, a public defender familiar with the case.

Law enforcement officers have said they see Tasers as a tool that can benefit the public by reducing injuries to police and the citizens they arrest.

Seattle police officials declined to comment on this case, citing concerns that Brooks might file a civil lawsuit.

But King County sheriff's Sgt. Donald Davis, who works on the county's Taser policy, said the use of force is a balancing act for law enforcement.

"It just doesn't look good to the public," he said.

Brooks' run-in with police Nov. 23 came six months before Seattle adopted a new policy on Taser use that guides officers on how to deal with pregnant women, the very young, the very old and the infirm. When used on such subjects, the policy states, "the need to stop the behavior should clearly justify the potential for additional risks."

"Obviously, (law enforcement agencies) don't want to use a Taser on young children, pregnant woman or elderly people," Davis said. "But if in your policy you deliberately exclude a segment of the population, then you have potentially closed off a tool that could have ended a confrontation."

Brooks was stopped in the 8300 block of Beacon Avenue South, just outside the African American Academy, while dropping her son off for school.

In a two-day trial that ended Friday, the officer involved, Officer Juan Ornelas, testified he clocked Brooks' Dodge Intrepid doing 32 mph in a 20-mph school zone.

He motioned her over and tried to write her a ticket, but she wouldn't sign it, even when he explained that signing it didn't mean she was admitting guilt.

Brooks, in her testimony, said she believed she could accept a ticket without signing for it, which she had done once before.

"I said, 'Well, I'll take the ticket, but I won't sign it,' " Brooks testified.

Officer Donald Jones joined Ornelas in trying to persuade Brooks to sign the ticket. They then called on their supervisor, Sgt. Steve Daman.

He authorized them to arrest her when she continued to refuse.

The officers testified they struggled to get Brooks out of her car but could not because she kept a grip on her steering wheel.

And that's when Jones brought out the Taser.

Brooks testified she didn't even know what it was when Jones showed it to her and pulled the trigger, allowing her to hear the crackle of 50,000 volts of electricity.

The officers testified that was meant as a final warning, as a way to demonstrate the device was painful and that Brooks should comply with their orders.

When she still did not exit her car, Jones applied the Taser.

In his testimony, the Taser officer said he pressed the prongs of the muzzle against Brooks' thigh to no effect. So he applied it twice to her exposed neck.

Afterward, he and the others testified, Ornelas pushed Brooks out of the car while Jones pulled.

She was taken to the ground, handcuffed and placed in a patrol car, the officers testified.

She told jurors the officer also used the device on her arm, and showed them a dark, brown burn to her thigh, a large, red welt on her arm and a lump on her neck, all marks she said came from the Taser application.

At the South Precinct, Seattle fire medics examined Brooks, confirmed she was pregnant and recommended she be evaluated at Harborview Medical Center.

Brooks said she was worried about the effect the trauma and the Taser might have on her baby, but she delivered a healthy girl Jan. 31.

Still, she said, she remains shocked that a simple traffic stop could result in her arrest.

"As police officers, they could have hurt me seriously. They could have hurt my unborn fetus," she said.

"All because of a traffic ticket. Is this what it's come down to?"

Davis said Tasers remain a valuable tool, and that situations like Brooks' are avoidable.

"I know the Taser is controversial in all these situations where it seems so egregious," he said. "Why use a Taser in a simple traffic stop? Well, the citizen has made it more of a problem. It's no longer a traffic stop. This is now a confrontation."
source: http://www.seattlepi.com/local/223578_taser10.html

Update.
SEATTLE (AP) — A federal appeals court says three Seattle police officers were justified when they used a stun gun on a pregnant mother who refused to sign a traffic ticket.
source: http://www.kgw.com/news/national/89290057.html

What an idiot, she was speeding in a school zone. She refused to sign and then not get out of her car when she was asked probably to talk to the supervisor. Not to mention she was holding on the steering wheel on protesting on getting out of the car. She was better off just signing the ticket. I don't feel sorry for her.
 
Wow. I don't think I need to even say anything about this.
 
is there a law in Washington that you must sign traffic tickets?

She's guilty of two things: not cooperating and speeding in school zone (32 in 20 is not a big deal). It's hardly worth tasing someone. I think the cop(s?) was just badge heavy.

I'm sure cops dealt with these problems 20 years ago without having to tase people
 
Remember this one?
[video=youtube;BpVFE_1WS7A]

Sign the ticket you dumb bitch!
 
is there a law in Washington that you must sign traffic tickets?

She's guilty of two things: not cooperating and speeding in school zone (32 in 20 is not a big deal). It's hardly worth tasing someone. I think the cop(s?) was just badge heavy.

I'm sure cops dealt with these problems 20 years ago without having to tase people

She refused to cooperate. The supervisor authorized her arrest. She refused to exit her vehicle and kept a tight grip on her steering wheel. Obviously they were within their rights to insist she exit the vehicle.

Removal of a conscious, unwilling individual from an automobile is a tricky endeavor. Even moreso in the case of one who is 8 months pregnant. I imagine that they actually risked more damage to her and to the fetus if they attempted to physically wrestle her from the vehicle than they did by using the taser.
 
She refused to cooperate. The supervisor authorized her arrest. She refused to exit her vehicle and kept a tight grip on her steering wheel. Obviously they were within their rights to insist she exit the vehicle.
I understand this. I read the article. Why were they making such a big deal about signing the ticket, they already had her info.

I've refused to sign a ticket in North Carolina and the cop said it didn't matter, I was getting the ticket regardless. Is the law different in Washington?

Removal of a conscious, unwilling individual from an automobile is a tricky endeavor. Even moreso in the case of one who is 8 months pregnant. I imagine that they actually risked more damage to her and to the fetus if they attempted to physically wrestle her from the vehicle than they did by using the taser.

You might want to actually read the article if you're going to make statements like this. It said:
Afterward, he and the others testified, Ornelas pushed Brooks out of the car while Jones pulled.

She was taken to the ground, handcuffed and placed in a patrol car, the officers testified
.
 
Tasers are for torture, pure and smple.

As demonstrated in this case, their use seldom changes the situation. After torturing her and getting their jollies, they still had to wrestle and push her out of the car, knock her down, and cuff her.

Forcing her to sign violates the Fifth Amendment anyway.
 
She refused to cooperate.

So?

I've refused to cooperate with the police many times. I once forcibly removed a Lake Oswego officer from my vehicle when he tried to climb in and search it illegally after I told him he couldn't. In the scuffle he ended up cutting his forearm rather badly and bled on my upholstery, but I got him out and locked the door.

No charges were filed against me and the incident was never mentioned to his superiors as far as I know.

Just because they have a badge doesn't make them right, or even good people.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top