shamelessblazer
Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
- Messages
- 629
- Likes
- 6
- Points
- 18
The Sergio supporters claim he has cut down on his turnovers. Yes, it's true. Sergio is averaging a career best 3.84 TO/48. Down from last season's 4.05 TO/48. However, it's Blake that has shown even more improvement in this area - and he was already much better at protecting the ball than Sergio. This season, Blake is averaging a career best 1.56 TO/48, down from last year's 2.24 TO/48. Sergio is more than twice as likely to turn the ball over as Blake, and the gap is getting wider, not narrower. Another way to look at it is Blake has just one more TO in 215 minutes than Sergio has in 75 minutes.
Well Sergio has the ball a lot more than Blake when they're in, and the team scores far more. Blake just gives the ball to Roy then hides in the corner. A better thing to look at would be team assists/turnovers when Serigo is on the floor compared to team assists/turnovers with Blake on the floor.
Sergio -http://www.82games.com/0809/08POR2D.HTM
Blake - http://www.82games.com/0809/08POR1D.HTM
Interesting items to note:
With Sergio we have: 49% effective FG%, 68% of FG assisted, 9 TO (per 48)
we allow/force: 49% eff FG%, 63% FG assisted all, 14 TO (per 48)
With Blake we have:49% effective FG%, 53% of FG ass, 10 TO (per 48)
we allow: 55% eff FG%, 53% FG assisted all, 11 TO (per 48)
What can we deduce from these numbers? Probably not a ton, but those asserting Sergio plays much more inefficient than Blake are simply wrong. We score at the same %, and defend at the same % (per possession) but we basically dare the opponent to up the tempo, and then beat them at it (in the form of net turnovers and assisted FG). We actually turn the ball over less in this system. If the roles were reversed I'm not sure Sergio's units could support this type of data for longer periods of time as we do tend to shock the other team, but Sergio's unit simply plays better (compared to the other team) than Blake's. This does not mean Sergio is the better player, and it could be due to the other teams focus in scouting, tired legs, lack of depth...etc. But no one should dare try to use Blake's numbers to show why he's a better PG and claim team play, that is for sure. We also play better defense with Sergio's units on the floor. I get that the other team gets more easy buckets (this is true) but they also turn the ball over more often and force more poor shots.
Viva Sergio (for at least 20 mpg with Rudy)
Blake is a better shooter, I'll give him that. But Sergio's units flow more cohesively and are more efficient (compared to the other team) than Blake's.