illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,763
- Likes
- 56,275
- Points
- 113
Well so much for sanity: http://columbian.com/article/20091205/BLOGS05/912059998/-1/blazerbanter
Nate going with the same lineup, BRoy still complaining about playing the 3. But this is noteworthy: It wasn't that I was, 'Put Dre in the second unit.' I wanted to be in the 2-guard spot. So, we'll see. He hasn't said he's going to make a change, so I'm not going to think ahead. We've got the same starting lineup tonight, and we've got to do a better job of executing and playing much better defense. When we do that, then we can kind of see where we're at that. But until we do that, we can't expect lineup changes to help us out."
Nate still confused by this. Why not try a Miller-Roy-Webster lineup?
Nate going with the same lineup, BRoy still complaining about playing the 3. But this is noteworthy: It wasn't that I was, 'Put Dre in the second unit.' I wanted to be in the 2-guard spot. So, we'll see. He hasn't said he's going to make a change, so I'm not going to think ahead. We've got the same starting lineup tonight, and we've got to do a better job of executing and playing much better defense. When we do that, then we can kind of see where we're at that. But until we do that, we can't expect lineup changes to help us out."
Nate still confused by this. Why not try a Miller-Roy-Webster lineup?
Last edited:





