Trade Idea Should the blazers trade away the bench or a starter

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Orion Bailey

Forum Troll
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
26,285
Likes
21,508
Points
113
this is to discuss if we should mix up the starting five or the second unit with trades. Or both.
 
We need a better forward in the stsrting lineup but i think the moves to be made will be regarding the bench.
 
OB this isn't meant to be disrespectful, by why are you starting all these threads? Did I miss something?
I'm not trying to be the thread police, I'm just not certain you actually want to talk about any of the things you started a thread over... If you do than I apologize.
 
OB this isn't meant to be disrespectful, by why are you starting all these threads? Did I miss something?
I'm not trying to be the thread police, I'm just not certain you actually want to talk about any of the things you started a thread over... If you do than I apologize.

They can be deleted. Being obnoxious to some that refused to heed to some common sense and were obnoxious abuot it. Sunday morning fun. Dont let it get to you like a few have. :)
 
They can be deleted. Being obnoxious to some that refused to heed to some common sense and were obnoxious abuot it. Sunday morning fun. Dont let it get to you like a few have. :)
Fair enough, I'm not upset it, was just sort of confused where this was coming from all of a sudden.
 
Fair enough, I'm not upset it, was just sort of confused where this was coming from all of a sudden.

It came from a few posters trying to explain to some thread starters, that conversations are easier to follow when contained in one thread shen it comes to radnom thoughts, rather than creating a thread for radnom thoughts.
The explanations provided were returned with obnoxious rebuttals and so i gave a one tume dose as to how obnoxious it is to have thread after thread created for random thoughts and/or the same topic being discussed in one or more already created threads.

I fully expected a mod to pm me by now and tell me they are deleting things and i would say have at it and sorry for the work, just having some fun and proving a point.


All of these threads are pretty annoying arent they????
:)
 
It came from a few posters trying to explain to some thread starters, that conversations are easier to follow when contained in one thread shen it comes to radnom thoughts, rather than creating a thread for radnom thoughts.
The explanations provided were returned with obnoxious rebuttals and so i gave a one tume dose as to how obnoxious it is to have thread after thread created for random thoughts and/or the same topic being discussed in one or more already created threads.

I fully expected a mod to pm me by now and tell me they are deleting things and i would say have at it and sorry for the work, just having some fun and proving a point.


All of these threads are pretty annoying arent they????
:)
It doesn't really bother me if there are many threads. Though I understand why it bothers others. Just normally you're not one of those who starts a bunch of them so when I kept saying one after the other pop up I thought it was strange.
I chose to start very few threads because I'm sure someone will find some thread from 2 years ago and tell me I should've put it in there :). I think if people used "common sense" on when to start threads or when to add to a pre-existing one things would work out just fine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top