- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,096
- Likes
- 9,073
- Points
- 113
There's a pretty decent Scientific American article (Aug. 3, p. 46-53---no link since it cuts off the article unless you pay) about the nuclear waste options now that the President and SecEnergy have taken Yucca Mountain off the table. It's not hard-core science and engineering, but a decent survey of the history behind waste storage and how it came to be Yucca Mountain that was chosen (and now, un-chosen). My personal takeaway is that politics and fear (in no small part to scientific ignorance) have stalled this, and problem-solvers aren't being allowed to have a go at it for political reasons. And that's something I have a problem with.
But I think it's a decent read whether you know a ton about nuclear waste or not.
But I think it's a decent read whether you know a ton about nuclear waste or not.


