Sorry, MIXUM....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
Looks like your wish ain't in the cards.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/11/trail_blazers_return_home_with.html

The Trail Blazers returned from their five-game trip with four wins, but with only 11 healthy players and looming questions about whether they have enough depth.

General manager Kevin Pritchard said he will not immediately seek reinforcements after Travis Outlaw became the second forward this season to suffer a long-term injury, saying he will first see if veteran Juwan Howard and rookie Dante Cunningham can do the job.

"I want to give Juwan and Dante an opportunity; they deserve it," Pritchard said Monday after the Blazers' 99-95 overtime loss in Atlanta. "That doesn't mean we are not going to look and be opportunistic if there is a guy out there. But these guys will get the opportunity first.".....

Meanwhile..........

...Brandon Roy, an All-Star shooting guard, has been playing extensive minutes at small forward, which nightly has forced him to guard bigger, stronger players. On the team's recent trip, the 6-foot-6 Roy gave up length against Rudy Gay (6-8), Peja Stojakovic (6-10) and Marvin Williams (6-9), or brawn against Charlotte's Gerald Wallace and Atlanta's Joe Johnson.

The physical Wallace, in particular, seemed to tax Roy. When told that it appeared Wallace was a load, Roy fluttered his lips.

"You're telling me," he said. "You're telling me."

Roy lifted weights after Wednesday's game in Minnesota, an uncharacteristic game-night practice.

"I might have to start doing that regularly," Roy said after battling Wallace in Charlotte.

The chore of guarding small forwards has eliminated one of Roy's strengths -- getting in the passing lanes to make steals. Roy has led the Blazers in steals the past two seasons, but he did not record a steal on the five game trip, and has just one steal in the seven games since moving to small forward. In the five games he started at shooting guard, Roy had three steals.........
 
Let's see what DC brings to the table. He's built like like a freaking tank and supposedly has mad hops. Maybe we can get a Josh Smith light (dreaming I know)?
 
I've been OK with the 3-guard lineup, but, DANG I feel for Brandon after reading that!
 
Meh, GM talk.

What do you expect him to say?

"We're on track to win a championship in the not-too-distant future. Even though we've had some medical-related setbacks, we're going to do everything within our power to remain on task.....whatever that takes."
 
Roy playing SFs night after night is not good for the long run. I hope Nate stops this lineup soon.
 
If we run a 3 guard lineup at least play your 3 best guards! Miller, Roy and Rudy
 
"We're on track to win a championship in the not-too-distant future. Even though we've had some medical-related setbacks, we're going to do everything within our power to remain on task.....whatever that takes."

That removes whatever leverage he has when it comes to trade talk.

By saying that we are fine going forward with our depth - he does not seem to be desperate for a trade.
 
we need an effin SF body to guard an SF body, ffs.

It should be Miller, Roy, Webster, Aldridge, Oden

atleast webster actually did somethin when he was in startin lineup, he has been terrible recently
 
That removes whatever leverage he has when it comes to trade talk.

Really? Hmm...I don't think it does. I know that GMs usually don't get into specifics, but I've seen many be publicly frank when it comes to stating their immediate realistic desires.
 
Roy playing SFs night after night is not good for the long run. I hope Nate stops this lineup soon.

Yeah, I agree. I'm not a fan of moving our best player out of position, for the expense of putting Blakey on the floor more. Hopefully he'll be back at SG soon. The guy lost 10 something pounds in the offseason to be lighter and quicker against SGs, and now, he could probably use the extra weight to bang around.
 
"I want to give Juwan and Dante an opportunity; they deserve it," Pritchard said Monday after the Blazers' 99-95 overtime loss in Atlanta. "That doesn't mean we are not going to look and be opportunistic if there is a guy out there. But these guys will get the opportunity first.".....
Kudos to KP. Now to get Nate on board....
 
If we run a 3 guard lineup at least play your 3 best guards! Miller, Roy and Rudy
Agreed. If not, start Martell. I know he's kind of stunk lately, but I thought he played better when he was starting.
 
Webster actually did something when starting. He's doing absolutely nothing off the bench.
 
Webster actually did something when starting. He's doing absolutely nothing off the bench.

He's always been that way; that's why he and Outlaw were such an interesting pair. Outlaw can't start, and Webster has to start.
 
That removes whatever leverage he has when it comes to trade talk.

By saying that we are fine going forward with our depth - he does not seem to be desperate for a trade.

How does not seeming desperate for a trade remove his leverage?

If he had said, "Damn it, we're screwed if we don't make a move!", would that increase his leverage in a trade?
 
How does not seeming desperate for a trade remove his leverage?

If he had said, "Damn it, we're screwed if we don't make a move!", would that increase his leverage in a trade?

I think you misunderstood what Andalusian was saying. You and he are on the same page.
 
when roy gets hurt... our season will be over. its coming next because our scumbg gm is afraid to trade his over rated roster.

just a matter of time till roy is hurt. wasnt the plan .. to keep roy fresh and healthy for april? seems like we are just working him into the ground now. guess who played the most minutes on road trip?
 
Roy playing SFs night after night is not good for the long run. I hope Nate stops this lineup soon.
complaining about the same thing night after night (especially when the club is winning) is not good for the reader in the short or long run. I hope this stops soon.
Webster actually did something when starting.
not enough

STOMP
 
complaining that we dont have a legit SF is annoying?

sorry that our best player is gonna get hurt cause of it. instead lest talk about how we really shoed the twolves and grizz who the better team was. man, i was so pumped after those wins!

how did the hawks game turn out? all that scoring from our SF really payed off! wait it turned out the same as it did vs the hawks in portland... and denver. we lost cause we couldnt score.

but man... im glad we beat those hornets and bobcats!
 
complaining that we dont have a legit SF is annoying?

sorry that our best player is gonna get hurt cause of it. instead lest talk about how we really shoed the twolves and grizz who the better team was. man, i was so pumped after those wins!

how did the hawks game turn out? all that scoring from our SF really payed off! wait it turned out the same as it did vs the hawks in portland... and denver. we lost cause we couldnt score.

but man... im glad we beat those hornets and bobcats!
seriously, why are you so scared? Brandon is less then an inch shorter then Martell and every bit as sturdy... hell do you think Batum is thicker then Roy?

get a grip on your panic attacks, they're ridiculous

STOMP
 
How does not seeming desperate for a trade remove his leverage?

If he had said, "Damn it, we're screwed if we don't make a move!", would that increase his leverage in a trade?

Other way around. My reference was to the post above.
 
seriously, why are you so scared? Brandon is less then an inch shorter then Martell and every bit as sturdy... hell do you think Batum is thicker then Roy?

get a grip on your panic attacks, they're ridiculous

STOMP

The difference is Webster isn't our franchise player, Roy is. I think the fear is to lose him to some injury. It wouldn't hit us as hard if Webster got injured.
 
sorry that our best player is gonna get hurt cause of it. instead lest talk about how we really shoed the twolves and grizz who the better team was. man, i was so pumped after those wins!

It's part of the master plan to get John Wall and a way for KP to show you some love. They know how much you love to whine - and that's their way of repaying you for devotion as a fan.
 
The difference is Webster isn't our franchise player, Roy is. I think the fear is to lose him to some injury. It wouldn't hit us as hard if Webster got injured.
injury is always a risk for every player. Claiming Roy playing SF raises that risk is very debatable. Saying injury is inevitable in this situation is posters wetting their pants.

it seems every day Martell's biggest supporters here concoct some new reason he just has to play...

STOMP
 
Last edited:
injury is always a risk for every player. Claiming Roy playing SF raises that risk is very debatable. Saying injury is inevitable in this situation is posters wetting their pants.

STOMP

Sure it's always a risk and I think we can debate that playing SF may increase that risk. I never saw Roy this tired before and the Blazers had 5 games in 7 days before. I remember the beginning of last season was very difficult, yet Roy had energy to push through it all.
 
injury is always a risk for every player. Claiming Roy playing SF raises that risk is very debatable. Saying injury is inevitable in this situation is posters wetting their pants.

it seems every day Martell's biggest supporters here concoct some new reason he just has to play...

STOMP

I'm not saying that Roy is at a greater risk for injury. I am 100% certain, however, that having him consistently defend taller and stronger players will wear him out faster than defending similar sized (or smaller) SGs. I don't understand the logic of taking a physically imposing SG and making him into one of the smaller SFs in the NBA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top