EL PRESIDENTE
Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 50,346
- Likes
- 22,532
- Points
- 113
ITS HAPPENING. :MARIS61:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Love seeing forward progress in society!
You clearly don't pay much attention to this board, do you? If you did, you'd realize society is clearly unraveling.
She's clearly the worst assistant coach in the NBA because reasons.
I'm glad you said this, for I was going to put " Also... In before the sexist comments" But i digressed... but now you gave me a perfect vehicle to say it!
Like no experience?
You mean like tons of people who get into assistant coaching. I agree it's puzzling that she has no experience playing men's basketball...how do we explain that? But if we widen that to experience playing basketball, she has plenty.
Plus, Pop specifically mentioned that she has already been working with players in an unofficial capacity, and that they have responded well to her.You mean like tons of people who get into assistant coaching. I agree it's puzzling that she has no experience playing men's basketball...how do we explain that? But if we widen that to experience playing basketball, she has plenty.
The Spurs are about the only team that could have done that. Popovich will retire there on his terms so he is under no risk if this move backfires.
Backfires?
When has the hiring of an assistant coach ever "backfired", whatever that means.
You mean like tons of people who get into assistant coaching. I agree it's puzzling that she has no experience playing men's basketball...how do we explain that? But if we widen that to experience playing basketball, she has plenty.
Like no experience?
I'm glad you said this, for I was going to put " Also... In before the sexist comments" But i digressed... but now you gave me a perfect vehicle to say it!
And I think it's pretty ridiculous that just because she's a woman, people question the hire without knowing anything about her background.I think it's pretty ridiculous that just because she's a woman, people can't question the hire without being called sexist.
Considering the league hands out head coaching jobs like they're candy to former players, I don't have a problem with her lack of experience. Playing in the NBA does not qualify someone to coach. Jason Kidd was/is horrible. I still don't understand why guys like Derek Fisher and Steve Kerr were handed head coaching jobs with zero coaching experience, and I mean zero coaching experience. At least Kerr had front office experience, but that's still completely different from coaching.
The NBA is the absolute worst league when it comes to hiring former players as head coaches without any track record or experience. The NFL doesn't do it. MLB doesn't do it. I have no idea about the NFL or MLS, but I find it unlikely. Just because someone was a point guard does not make them a coach automatically.
And I think it's pretty ridiculous that just because she's a woman, people question the hire without knowing anything about her background.
Men's basketball and women's basketball are different, do you not agree?
I'm kind of confused by your post. You don't care about her lack of experience but then you talk about how bad Kidd, Fisher, etc. are because of their lack of experience. What makes Hammon a better hire, resume wise? Besides the fact that it's for an assistant job.
"Besides the fact that it's for an assistant job." So, you mean, besides the main difference? Assistant positions are specifically for inexperienced but promising (to the person hiring) candidates...the expectation is that they're not finished products but can contribute while continuing to learn about coaching. Head coaches are at the top of the (coaching) hierarchy. That single point that you brushed off completely changes the situation.
A few minutes reading any thread here, but especially the OT board, and you'd lose all faith in humanity. Much of it is in jest, but there are plenty of people that are totally serious and speaking their true beliefs.
I think it's pretty ridiculous that just because she's a woman, people can't question the hire without being called sexist.
I'm kind of confused by your post. You don't care about her lack of experience but then you talk about how bad Kidd, Fisher, etc. are because of their lack of experience. What makes Hammon a better hire, resume wise? Besides the fact that it's for an assistant job.
If a team hired a male assistant, who had extensive basketball experience but not in the NBA, except as an intern, no one would question the hire.
The Spurs hired a female assistant, who has extensive basketball experience but not in the NBA, except as an intern, but people question the hire.
And insist it has nothing to do with sexism.

