Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep I calculated out that Bayless would be averaging 16 pts and 4 assist per game if he got Blakes minutes. Not to mention shooting damn near .511 from the floor, which is completely awesome efficiency for a guard. Can you believe that?
Yep I calculated out that Bayless would be averaging 16 pts and 4 assist per game if he got Blakes minutes. Not to mention shooting damn near .511 from the floor, which is completely awesome efficiency for a guard. Can you believe that?
Yes I can but I can't believe the morons our coaches are, fire all the fukkin idiots!
Curiously...
Blake shot 4-8 with 5 boards and 4 assists and 2 steals in 38 minutes. He was +/- = -2.
Bayless was 4-5 with 1 board and 2 assists and 1 steal in 17 minutes. He was -10.
Absolutely meaningless. We watched the game.
Bayless was the only only one who cared.
Curiously...
Blake shot 4-8 with 5 boards and 4 assists and 2 steals in 38 minutes. He was +/- = -2.
Bayless was 4-5 with 1 board and 2 assists and 1 steal in 17 minutes. He was -10.
How many free throws did Bayless shoot?
1-2 vs. 6-7 for Bayless.
Don't get me wrong, I have zero personal attachment to Blake or Nate, or Bayless for that matter. If you're going to lose by 10, you may as well play the young guy to get him experience.
Especially if the vet is part of the group that gets down by 24.
-2 (led the team).
Just sayin'
and Juwan Howard was +12. Which proves the +- is a worthless stat.
But Steve is the record holder for most assists in 1 quarter, so obviously he has that going for him.
Is it really worthless? Maybe Howard should have played more, too. His 3 rebounds meant 3 stops.
Is it really worthless? Maybe Howard should have played more, too. His 3 rebounds meant 3 stops.
Yes it is really worthless.
Because was Juwan the best player on the court when he played? Nope. But he had the highest +- of the team.
Steve Blake screwed up yet another fastbreak today, and it's beyond fucking old. The guy is a zero.
I don't think it makes him the best player on the court at all. It just measures that he contributed a lot when he was in. Whatever lineup he was with that went +12 should have played a lot more, be it with Blake and/or Bayless at the same time as him, or not.
Make sense?
I don't want to undermine anyone arguing with Julius, but +/- doesn't track casuation at all. Some +/- stats, especially with guys who are only in a few minutes, are total bunk, because they are heavily influenced by the flow of the game around them.
HOWEVER, 3 defensive rebounds does say that he prevented 3 offensive rebounds. Given the Knicks shot 41%, he prevented 2-3 points directly. Not bad. You could give him a personal +3.
The 3-guard rotation had the best "big time" +/-, and were all similar. This leads me to believe that the 3-guard lineup has some merit still.
I don't think it makes him the best player on the court at all. It just measures that he contributed a lot when he was in. Whatever lineup he was with that went +12 should have played a lot more, be it with Blake and/or Bayless at the same time as him, or not.
Make sense?
