Steve Nash = Title?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BoomChakaLaka

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
3,376
Likes
2,074
Points
113
No, Steve Nash would not represent our PG of the futue, but trading Bayless and Outlaw to the Suns for Nash might get us a championship ring in 2010 or 2011.

Any takers on Nash?


Nash/Blake/Mills at PG
Roy/Rudy
Turk/Batum/Webster
LMA/Pendergraph
Oden/Pryz
 
We can't. We'd have to give up Blake, Outlaw and Bayless, and even then I think we fall short in making the salaries match.

Nash is out of reach I believe. It's either Hinrich or Miller IMO.
 
We can't. We'd have to give up Blake, Outlaw and Bayless, and even then I think we fall short in making the salaries match.

Nash is out of reach I believe. It's either Hinrich or Miller IMO.



Is Sessions or Harris out of reach in sending Outlaw and Bayless?

I'm just not a huge fan of Hinrich or Miller.


Nash=chance for title in 2010/2011
Harris or Sessions = chance in 2012 and beyond
 
Is Sessions or Harris out of reach in sending Outlaw and Bayless?

We could work around a package of Outlaw/Bayless to get Sessions, but it would take more to get Harris.
 
Is Sessions or Harris out of reach in sending Outlaw and Bayless?

I'm just not a huge fan of Hinrich or Miller.


Nash=chance for title in 2010/2011
Harris or Sessions = chance in 2012 and beyond

Salaries would match up, as we'd be now at the salary cap I presume, but if I'm MIL or NJN, I want more, a lot more.
 
It's Hinrich or nothing. Sessions can't shoot - an imperative at the guard spot now we have Turk - and the Bucks aren't likely to sign-and-trade. They'll sign or let go. They're dirt poor.
Miller needs the ball and can't shoot from outside, and only works with a running team. He would make a terrible fit for the team now we have Turk.
And Harris is, like Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Rajon Rondo and yes, even Ricky Rubio, a pipe dream.
 
It's Hinrich or nothing. Sessions can't shoot - an imperative at the guard spot now we have Turk - and the Bucks aren't likely to sign-and-trade. They'll sign or let go. They're dirt poor.
Miller needs the ball and can't shoot from outside, and only works with a running team. He would make a terrible fit for the team now we have Turk.

Agreed.
 
We can't. We'd have to give up Blake, Outlaw and Bayless, and even then I think we fall short in making the salaries match.

Nash is out of reach I believe. It's either Hinrich or Miller IMO.



realgm approves this trade:


Outlaw / Bayless / Webster / Pryzbilla

for

Nash / Lopez



Nash/Blake/Mills
Roy/Rudy
Turk/Batum/Cunningham
LMA/Pendergraph/Claver
Oden/Lopez
 
I'm sorry but have you lost your mind? We give up the future and shoot our wad for a chance a slim chance at a title with Steve Nash?

Sure trade Blake, Outlaw and Rudy for Nash but trading Bayless is long term suicide. If you don't believe in Bayless work out a trade for Sessions, Conley or Harris but for god sake lets not go the Boston one and done route!
 
We honestly don't really need a PG that can shoot, imo. Well, it would be nice, but I think that with the addition of another shooter in our starting lineup, someone that can rack up 20 assists a game will fit in as good, if not better than a shooter. And at like 22 years old, Ramon is the man.

And I'm also against Steve Nash.
 
realgm approves this trade:


Outlaw / Bayless / Webster / Pryzbilla

for

Nash / Lopez



Nash/Blake/Mills
Roy/Rudy
Turk/Batum/Cunningham
LMA/Pendergraph/Claver
Oden/Lopez

They're not a win-now team. We are. They don't need Przybilla. They won't want Webster's foot and his contract. They wouldn't want to let go of Lopez.

It's just not a smart move for them, nor for us, considering we lose Przybilla, who we'll need for this run to a championship, at least now.
 
It's Hinrich or nothing. Sessions can't shoot - an imperative at the guard spot now we have Turk

Can you explain what you mean by this? I understand valuing shooting from the point guard spot, but why does adding Turkoglu make shooting at the point guard position an "imperative?" If Portland had added a starting small forward that couldn't shoot, I'd understand...the team can't punt shooting at too many positions. But Turkoglu has been a fairly strong shooter through his career, so it seems to allow more leeway in terms of what caliber of shooter the team needs at point guard.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top