Supreme Court Will Hear ObamaCare Case Next March

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
http://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-hear-health-care-case-term-150759881.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear arguments next March over President Barack Obama's health care overhaul — a case that could shake the political landscape as voters are deciding if Obama deserves another term.

This decision to hear arguments in the spring sets up an election-year showdown over the White House's main domestic policy achievement. And it allows plenty of time for a decision in late June, just over four months before Election Day.

The justices announced they will hear an extraordinary five-and-a-half hours of arguments from lawyers on the constitutionality of a provision at the heart of the law and three other related questions about the act. The central provision in question is the requirement that individuals buy health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty.

In the modern era, the last time the court allotted anywhere near this much time for arguments was in 2003 for consideration of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. That case consumed four hours of argument. This argument may spread over two days, as the justices rarely hear more than two or three hours a day.

The 2010 health care overhaul law aims to extend insurance coverage to more than 30 million Americans, through an expansion of Medicaid, the requirement that individuals buy health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty and other measures. The court's ruling could decide the law's fate, but the justices left themselves an opening to defer a decision if they choose, by requesting arguments on one lower court's ruling that a decision must wait until 2015, when one of the law's many deferred provisions takes effect.

A White House spokesman said, "We are pleased that the court has agreed to hear this case."............................................
 
Good stuff. We know how 4 of the votes will go before it even gets there. The others will determine the outcome.
 
Good stuff. We know how 4 of the votes will go before it even gets there. The others will determine the outcome.

True. Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito will certainly vote that it is unconstitutional. The other five will probably listen to the arguments for and against.

barfo
 
True. Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito will certainly vote that it is unconstitutional. The other five will probably listen to the arguments for and against.

barfo

The court doesn't listen much to arguments for and against, nor should they.

The conservative leaning court ruled 6-3 in Lawrence v Texas. Maybe ideology has less to do with considering a case.

It really should be 9-0 that the mandate is unconstitutional. Barfo's chili, everyone must buy $x amount or else.

The mandate is not all the court is going to consider.
 
The justices announced they will hear an extraordinary five-and-a-half hours of arguments from lawyers on the constitutionality of a provision at the heart of the law and three other related questions about the act. The central provision in question is the requirement that individuals buy health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty.

In the modern era, the last time the court allotted anywhere near this much time for arguments was in 2003 for consideration of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. That case consumed four hours of argument. This argument may spread over two days, as the justices rarely hear more than two or three hours a day.


Typical 1%ers.

Never worked a full day in their lives.
 
Unreal that Kagan isn't recusing herself. You know how you can tell she should? The kurfuffle the Democratic Party tried to create about Ginny Thomas.
 
Unreal that Kagan isn't recusing herself. You know how you can tell she should? The kurfuffle the Democratic Party tried to create about Ginny Thomas.

Why would she when the 4 who've already made up their mind haven't recused themselves?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top