Terrific news for a country that needs it

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

maxiep

RIP Dr. Jack
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
28,321
Likes
5,919
Points
113
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html?no_interstitial

If we can manage to move the Afghan economy away from poppies to mining, it will not only deprive the Taliban of the primary source of their income, but it will also provide the funds to bring the country into at least the 20th Century--roads, schools, hospitals, etc. International investment into the country of more than arms will also help tie it to the world. This discovery may give these people a real chance.
 
I understand the arguments that in the short term these deposits could cause even more bloodshed and disruption, but the heavy equipment and the massive investment required to develop these mines will mean that if the Afghans want the wealth beneath their feet, they're going to have to allow foreigners to work in peace. Long term, this news is far more good than bad.
 
Heh, I saw a friend post this on FB today and immediately thought there's not a poor country on earth that has much benefited from getting a bonanza of mineral wealth. Congo, Saudi Arabia, etc...
I think I'm going to have to disagree and say in the long-term, they'd be better off being poor and left alone until they're not poor any more.
 
Obviously it depends on who controls the resources and how they are used. I know there is a lot of (often justified) criticism of the government of Venezuela, but they have used oil wealth for schools and health care. OTOH, Angola is one of the richest (in minerals) and poorest (in human misery) countries on earth. Congo, as Mike mentioned, even worse.
 
Yep, one step closer to US occupation. ;)
 
I was about to say that...yay! Colonialism!
 
Yep, one step closer to US occupation. ;)

Not necessarily an awful thing, although typically if you haven't already had a healthy economy, then it's not good.

Germany and Japan were occupied for a bit.
 
Obviously it depends on who controls the resources and how they are used. I know there is a lot of (often justified) criticism of the government of Venezuela, but they have used oil wealth for schools and health care. OTOH, Angola is one of the richest (in minerals) and poorest (in human misery) countries on earth. Congo, as Mike mentioned, even worse.

This is really the problem here. In the hands of reasonable people in a well-ordered society, more resources leads to more wealth creation. In a corrupt, backward, or dictatorial society, it won't do much good and may do more harm than good. Unfortunately, Venezuela fits that category too, and Hugo Chavez is demonstrating himself quite good at strangling the golden goose he was given.
And it is not just China that has been active in the Latin American country. Caracas also granted Russian companies blocks in Orinoco in February, with Chávez acquiring $2.2 billion in Russian tanks and anti-aircraft missiles on credit. Since 2005, Venezuela has spent $4.4 billion on Russian weapons, including fighter jets, combat helicopters, and 100,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles. The two countries recently held joint exercises in the Caribbean, bringing the Russian navy there for the first time since the Cold War. After calling this part of a strategic alliance with Russia, Chávez snickered, "Go ahead and squeal, Yankees."

But Chávez's plan is not quite working out as he hoped -- indeed, he has discovered it takes more than handshakes and public displays to get oil out of the ground and onto the market. Venezuela's decaying oil industry and mounting domestic problems have prevented the Chávez government from effectively tapping the country's reserves, even with Chinese and Russian help. And they have forced Chávez to invite back the private energy companies he pilloried as the "overthrowers of governments" just three years ago.

In other words, he's:
1. Damaged the ability of Venezuelans to develop and sell their own oil.
2. Bankrupted the country, so much so that in a country that produces oil, there are now regular blackouts.
3. Given away the rights to significant chunks of the oil to China and Russia in exchange for weaponry. Which is quite a bit more likely to be used on Venezuelans than anyone else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top