Texas Church Bans Child's Photograph of Christ

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
126,859
Likes
147,505
Points
115
4398987166_65294fed4e_o.jpg

Some find Jackson Potts II's photograph of a nightstick-wielding policeman beating a fallen, bleeding child violent and offensive, conjuring images of police brutality and child abuse.

But to Jackson, a talented 10-year-old Houston photographer, and a cadre of art lovers, the disturbing image has religious symbolism.

Jackson shot the photograph for an exhibit depicting the Stations of the Cross, but the show's organizers rejected it, sparking a controversy some say is overshadowing remembrance of Jesus' final hours during the season of Lent.

Jackson was the only child among 15 artists invited to participate in the exhibit. Curator Marc Brubaker said he thought the boy would bring a unique perspective.

But comments posted anonymously on blogs and callers to radio talk shows have questioned whether such a sophisticated piece could really be the work of a child.

Jackson was assigned to portray the seventh Station of the Cross, where Jesus fell for a second time while carrying the cross to the site of his crucifixion. The home-schooled fifth-grader, who is taking a class on religious symbols in art at a Catholic church, decided to do a modern depiction of Christ being beaten by a Roman soldier.

"I thought about how innocent Jesus was, like a kid," Jackson said. "I thought a police officer was sort of like a Roman guard."

His younger brother played the Christ-child role, with stage blood splattered on his head and arms. Neighbors and friends portrayed an angry mob and brutal police officer.

...

But when Jackson submitted the finished piece, he was told it wouldn't be shown.

The fine arts gallery also serves as the sanctuary for the 1,100-member Ecclesia Church, and "a church should be a place where people can feel safe," Brubaker said.

Church elders said they thought the photograph would scare young children who trust and respect police officers, some of whom are also church members. Elders said they also wanted to be sensitive to a congregation member whose mentally impaired son was fatally shot by police around this time last year.

...

"We felt it was provocative in the wrong way," Wells said. "The image, being as graphic as it is, did not draw people closer to the risen Christ."

...

Suggestions by some gallery board members to have the original photograph behind a curtain where only adults could see it were rebuffed.

Two of the gallery's seven board members resigned in protest.

One of them, Jessica Martin-Weber, said she felt Jackson's photograph was appropriate for the exhibit and parents should decide whether their children could see it. A three-dimensional piece that hung in the show last year, a mannequin "corpse" draped in a blood-soaked cloth, was just as shocking, she said.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wirestory?id=10157112&page=1#

I like it. He did a good job. Hope he makes a few $$$ off of it.
 
Last edited:
Part 2

260xStory.jpg

After enduring weeks of controversy surrounding his photographic depiction of a police officer beating his little brother, 10-year-old Jackson Potts II decided to make a new image.

This one is more staid. It shows his 7-year-old brother, Dietrich, gazing down at a cross. The new piece will be hung in place of Jackson's first photo — banned by church leaders as disturbing to children — during Ecclesia Church's opening tonight of its stations of the cross exhibition.

“He's looking at a little cross, knowing what's going to happen,” Jackson said Friday, describing his new piece and referring to Jesus' crucifixion. “I still wanted it to be a kid because of the innocence, because Jesus was innocent.”

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6911097.html

Not bad but I like the original better.
 
The first was lame looking, sort of like a Nickelodeon version of the idea.

I mean, the blood was all wrong for a beating with a nightstick, and one whack would split that kid's head wide open.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top