The Missing "Mean"

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

e_blazer

Rip City Fan
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
24,282
Likes
30,494
Points
113
According to Dame, the Blazers just need to tap into their existing mean streaks to get better on defense:

http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/i...ing_for_mean_streak_o.html#incart_river_index

On perhaps a more practical side, it sounds like Terry Stotts is using the two-day break between games to kick some collective ass and really focus on getting back to basics on defensive play:

http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/i...ics_in_demanding_prac.html#incart_river_index

I'm hoping that the message and the practice pays off starting tomorrow night. Especially so since I have tickets and I want to see a win over the Pacers.
 
Just a hunch, but I believe what is missing from the Blazer's roster is a savvy vet or two.

Savvy vets to mentor the kids down during games to keep them focused.
Savvy vets that can give the kids hints on what the opposition is doing to them during a game, and how to counter those moves, especially on D.
Savvy vets that can help them get easy buckets.
 
The Blazers lack the hunger they did a year ago. The chips on their shoulders have been sated by saturated contracts that have defeated the thirst to prove themselves.
 
Just a hunch, but I believe what is missing from the Blazer's roster is a savvy vet or two.

Savvy vets to mentor the kids down during games to keep them focused.
Savvy vets that can give the kids hints on what the opposition is doing to them during a game, and how to counter those moves, especially on D.
Savvy vets that can help them get easy buckets.

Anyone have any Kaman sightings? Isnt he still with the team technically? Can we use him as a coach?
 
Anyone have any Kaman sightings? Isnt he still with the team technically? Can we use him as a coach?

He's an unsigned free agent. We'd need to cut, or trade, someone to clear a roster spot for him. Unless we make a trade, his vet minimum salary would put us over the luxury tax threshold.

I suppose we could add him as a coach if he's willing.

BNM
 
Just a hunch, but I believe what is missing from the Blazer's roster is a savvy vet or two.

Savvy vets to mentor the kids down during games to keep them focused.
Savvy vets that can give the kids hints on what the opposition is doing to them during a game, and how to counter those moves, especially on D.
Savvy vets that can help them get easy buckets.
Who?
 
He's an unsigned free agent. We'd need to cut, or trade, someone to clear a roster spot for him. Unless we make a trade, his vet minimum salary would put us over the luxury tax threshold.

I suppose we could add him as a coach if he's willing.

BNM

Do you think we could do any worse at the moment? I say get him in there as our coach for our bigs in the paint as well as screens and picknrolling.

We need something. He sure as hell couldn't hurt.
 
Do you think we could do any worse at the moment? I say get him in there as our coach for our bigs in the paint as well as screens and picknrolling.

We need something. He sure as hell couldn't hurt.

He may be holding out to see if anyone picks him up. He hasn't officially retired and the vet min salary for a player is going to be a lot more than he'd make as a first time assistant coach.

BNM
 
According to Dame, the Blazers just need to tap into their existing mean streaks to get better on defense:

http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/i...ing_for_mean_streak_o.html#incart_river_index

On perhaps a more practical side, it sounds like Terry Stotts is using the two-day break between games to kick some collective ass and really focus on getting back to basics on defensive play:

http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/i...ics_in_demanding_prac.html#incart_river_index

I'm hoping that the message and the practice pays off starting tomorrow night. Especially so since I have tickets and I want to see a win over the Pacers.
That's very interesting. It doesn't seem like the team's coach has a mean streak, at, all. Stotts is no Jerry Sloan or Norm Van Leer, that's for sure. And that has to filter down to the team, and the team's identity. If Stotts isn't a take no prisoners defensive coach, and he clearly isn't, then the Blazers need to hire one.
 
He may be holding out to see if anyone picks him up. He hasn't officially retired and the vet min salary for a player is going to be a lot more than he'd make as a first time assistant coach.

BNM

But... but... loyalty? Dames bro?
 
This is Portland. There is one, and only one, answer, and he's presently bumming around Australia.

Bring back Steve Blake.

So we can trade him for the 4th time, hopefully for someone decent.

BNM
 
So we can trade him for the 4th time, hopefully for someone decent.

BNM

Actually, you may be onto something. All three times we traded Blake we got a center in return (Magloire, Camby and Plumlee). So much for the adage you never trade a big for a small.

Blakey could be the linchpin in a deal that nets us Cousins, Whiteside or Noel!

BNM
 

A mean savvy vet, first name that comes to mind is……..
Steve Blake, believe he is now playing in Australia. He might help the guards play better.
Kris Kaman appeared to have made a positive impact on the young bigs while he was here.

But as BNM mentioned, it would take some cap space juggling. Olshey has our backs against a wall.

We would not bring the savvy vets in to make a positive impact on the floor, except in emergencies. But they could make a positive impact to the game by being mentors.

There probably are other unsigned older savvy vets to consider. I have not given it much thought past what is wrong and how to fix it. Our young kids are giving a good effort. They have talent. But right now, we are not getting the most out of their talent.

Actually KingSpeed, you probably have a better handle on whom than I do.
 
Last edited:
We need an enforcer like Pryzbilla!
Haha, I was just going to say that Blakey was like a little Pryzbilla. Steve wouldn't back down to anyone and he wouldn't hesitate to get into a boxing stance and prove it.
 
We need an enforcer like Pryzbilla!

Whenever we've been REALLY good (like WCF or Finals good), we've had an enforcer at PF - a guy that rebounds, plays defense and doesn't back down from anyone. First it was Luke, then Buck and then BGrant.

BNM
 
Hell I'd take Kendrick Perkins right now.
 
You want a vet...pump fakin' Dorell Wright...also Dame's buddy
 
I'll believe it when I see it
 
Stotts is not a defensive coach but teams don't just go from middle of the pack defensively to bottom 3 in one year with no real big roster changes and no philosophical changes because of the coach. At this point there are fifty holes in a sinking ship and you have one bucket and a roll of duck tape to fix it, you can't fix everything so you patch up what you can and hope that every little fix leads to the next one being a little easir.
 
Stotts may not be a good defensive coach, but he's also working with a roster that really isn't capable of good defense. Lillard and McCollum make a horrendous defensive backcourt, there's no rim protection on the team as long as Ezeli is on the shelf, Harkless and Crabbe have never been good defenders according to advanced metrics and the team's two best perimeter defenders, Turner and Aminu are only decent--not stoppers.

As long as you have that kind of personnel, no system is going to work--you can shuffle deck chairs to try and mitigate the worst problems, but good offensive teams are simply going to find the things you're trading off in your arrangement. Systems don't create talent--they enable talent. The Blazers don't have (defensive) talent.

You could point the finger at Olshey for putting together a roster that can't play defense, but his hands were tied a bit by virtue of his best players being extreme defensive minuses. Unless you're down on the drafting of Lillard and McCollum, Olshey has been in a pretty difficult predicament from the start. It's probably not impossible to build a functional defense around Lillard and McCollum (though a top-five and maybe even a top-ten defense is probably impossible), it will be very difficult while maintaining a good offense. You could fix the defense quickest by installing defensive specialists (like a Biyombo type) at the other three positions, but then the offense would grind to a halt, as Lillard and McCollum would find their air space cramped by defenses collapsing onto them. Finding good two-way players is hard enough, but what Portland really needs is solid offensive players who are defensive standouts to cover for the backcourt. Finding enough of those will take a miracle.

That's why I felt expectations for this team were too high going into this season. Portland rode a hot streak in the second half last season, and that was great. But there were clear problems that were going to prevent them from taking the next step and the likes of Turner and a rarely-present Ezeli weren't going to fix that.

In my opinion, the eventual solution will likely be to trade McCollum. As much fun as he is, especially in combination with Lillard, he's likely to be more valuable to another team that can pair him with a superior defender. I don't think it's likely that you can win with two such players, but one such can be a big asset with the right supporting cast. Trading McCollum for a good offensive player who can also play solid defense would make building the rest of the team more manageable, in my opinion.
 
Haha, I was just going to say that Blakey was like a little Pryzbilla. Steve wouldn't back down to anyone and he wouldn't hesitate to get into a boxing stance and prove it.
have you seen the video of him fighting at Maryland? if not here it is
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top