riverman
Writing Team
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 68,618
- Likes
- 67,939
- Points
- 113
you getting nostalgic for those #23 wins again? last year the Thunder were supposed to eat our lunch!Be careful tossing around this common sense FAMS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you getting nostalgic for those #23 wins again? last year the Thunder were supposed to eat our lunch!Be careful tossing around this common sense FAMS.
Everybody is going to be losing......To tell you the truth, I think we lose more games this year, the competition is only part of it. I think Nurk being out and the fact that there are so many new players is probably more of a factor. Going to take a bit for that chemistry to kick in. Other teams will have to deal with their chemistry issues as well.....and guess what happens while this is happening.....more losses. Everybody is gonna be losing. I love it.
Both things could be true and were still wouldnt be overachieving by going 29-23 against the West.I don't believe that the argument is that we'll lose more games solely because the west got tougher, but simply that that is one of a group of reasons to expect a worse record, along with Nurk being out for an extended stretch, presumed growing pains of young players thrust into significant roles, significant loss of roster continuity, belief that the overall record against the east was somewhat flukey, lack of Meyers' all-league towel-waving, etc.
Now, it's possible that none of those concerns impact the record, but it's not "illogical" to believe they might.
I'm not even making that assumption. I'm arguing the logic in isolation. It doesnt apply to the same team who underachieved against the West.This is key.
The underlying assumption that @BonesJones is making is that we'll be as good or better than last year as a roster.
-Our bench is totally different, we have fewer shooters (Curry/Leonard), worse wing defense (Aminu/Harkless), and a different locker room (ET's absence). We're gonna be relying heavily on Zach and Simons who are both largely unproven, and Nurkic's absence could finally catch up to us.
We could just as easily be worse. All this is speculation obviously, but could happen.
So what do you think our record against the West will be?I don’t believe anybody is saying that Portland is the ONLY team who is going to lose more. Thats the whole point. There isn’t one super team anymore. There are 6 really good teams, thus why people think there will be more loses. I don’t have pie charts or graphs, just some common sense that when there are MORE quality teams, MORE loses are going to happen. Not that we are worse than last season, just tougher comp is all.
You're asking the HCP to think? The reason he's a great photographer is that he just points and shoots....thinking would probably make him lose that edge!So what do you think our record against the West will be?
The reason he's a great photographer is that he just points and shoots
I get a commission for keeping him distracted...but apparently he hit his target at least twice!that's the very thing his wife complains about
But if someones saying the "West got tougher" theyre using last year (how the West was) and comparing it to this year (how the West is now). This thread is in response to that.I don't really look at last season what we did or didn't do. This is brand new season so we don't know exactly what teams will do we can speculate by looking at the roster but until we play the game then we know who does what this season.
