Politics ...this may give Trump the excuse he needs to fire Rosenstein;

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

...wait, what?...where did that come from?...when did I do that?
I said "Let me rephrase that. You appear picky today."
You replied "...no, again, Lanny, not at all. ..." I assumed you were replying to my statement of you appearing picky. My appearance of you cannot be challenged. What appears to me appears to me. There is no right or wrong about it unless I say that I misspoke which I did not. I didn't actually say you were picky but that it appeared that way. I hope this treatise clears this up.

Let me be clear, I like you. I say that lest anyone get any other idea.
 
President Trump appeared to blame Attorney General Jeff Sessions for the latest controversy surrounding Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Sunday, saying that Sessions had "hired" Rosenstein to be his second-in-command.

"He was hired by Jeff Sessions," Trump said in an interview with "The Geraldo Show" on WTAM radio. "I was not involved in that process because, you know, they go out and get their own deputies and the people that work in the department."


...Trump is a lying POS...in other news, water is wet.
 
President Trump appeared to blame Attorney General Jeff Sessions for the latest controversy surrounding Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Sunday, saying that Sessions had "hired" Rosenstein to be his second-in-command.

"He was hired by Jeff Sessions," Trump said in an interview with "The Geraldo Show" on WTAM radio. "I was not involved in that process because, you know, they go out and get their own deputies and the people that work in the department."


...Trump is a lying POS...in other news, water is wet.

Tremendously wet.

barfo
 
...Trump is a lying POS...in other news, water is wet.

Now this is the gratuitous sort of post I find most offensive. Just making crude posts about our President without purpose or any attempt at having a discussion.

This sort of post adds nothing to the forum except perhaps a virtue signal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now this is the gratuitous sort of post I find most offensive. Just making crude posts about our President without purpose or any attempt at having a discussion.

This sort of post adds nothing to the forum except perhaps a virtue signal to your cheap ass kind.
The sort of thing assholes do to prove they are in the club.


...uhhh, here you go...enjoy; (Oh, did I mention, "Trump is a lying POS".


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...versy-dont-look-at-me-jeff-sessions-hired-him


"Trump nominated Rosenstein to be deputy attorney general on Jan. 31, 2017. He was confirmed as the second-ranking official at the Justice Department in April of last year."
 
Who are you responding to? Is it someone I might have on ignore? Now you see why there's an ignore feature.

Ha! Yeah this is funny. The mod edited my post Lanny, he was definitely signalling you,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course Trump put Rosensteins name in to the Senate for confirmation as the second guy in Justice! It his his call, but like he said, Sessions is the guy that wanted him. They both failed him badly. But I suppose idiots will see a lie if it makes them feel smart.
 
I've got him on ignore. He's the only one I've got on ignore.

Surprisingly, I find enough good in the others that I routinely disagree with that I don't ignore them.
 
Of course Trump put Rosensteins name in to the Senate for confirmation as the second guy in Justice! It his his call, but like he said, Sessions is the guy that wanted him. They both failed him badly. But I suppose idiots will see a lie if it makes them feel smart.

...Trump flat out said that "I was not involved in that process"..." ...and THAT is a flat out lie. He is clearly trying to distance himself from Rosenstein.
 
What insulting post? See, the ignore feature works miracles.


...I'd rather not repeat it, Lanny. He was obviously trying to be purposely vague and coy as to who he was insulting...seems sometimes that he's trying to get banned.
 
...Trump flat out said that "I was not involved in that process"..." ...and THAT is a flat out lie.
Yep, yes sir, you are totally correct, not that you needed to hear that, but I'm gonna say it anyhow.
 
...I'd rather not repeat it, Lanny. He was obviously trying to be purposely vague and coy as to who he was insulting...seems sometimes that he's trying to get banned.
Best not to repeat it, it's the reason I've got him on ignore.
How on Earth could anyone defend having sex with children?
 
Best not to repeat it, it's the reason I've got him on ignore.
How on Earth could anyone defend having sex with children?

Looks like Lanny is about to fuck up big time!
 
What the ___ is up with you? I don't think it is a lie at all! But I can see why an ___ could feel smart calling it a lie.

...lol, what's up with me?...well, let's see;

1. First, Trump claims "I was not involved in that process"..." (nominating/appointing Rosenstein)

2. But the fact is; "Trump nominated Rosenstein to be deputy attorney general on Jan. 31, 2017. He was confirmed as the second-ranking official at the Justice Department in April of last year."

3.
And you even said, "Of course Trump put Rosensteins name in to the Senate for confirmation as the second guy in Justice! It his his call..."






...So someone is lying, and it's Trump. If you can disprove any of the above statements/quotes with some tangible proof, please do so without hurling insults.
 
I don't see a lie.


...pretty much what I thought...you completely deny/discount the facts when they are presented to you and instead, you then promptly and predictably resort to your only recourse which are more insults...the last bastion of someone who has lost an argument and cannot/will not provide any compelling facts to support his stance....how impressive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top