magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
Okay after thinking this over and over about Roy's struggles, I have come to a conclusion. And call me out if you think I'm full of shit.
1.) Roy of old. I remembered him not really "scoring" too much in the first half. Basically waiting for his game to come to him. Of course there are exceptions, but I remembered the majority of his games, he played tentative in the 1st and 2nd and turned it on in the third and fourth quarters.
2.) It's obvious Nate is playing Roy as more of a "role player", in terms of minutes; yet he expects Roy to do the things Roy does before his injury.
3.) There was a comment made about Roy being more of a "James Jones" type of contributor; which maybe the best role for him. If this is true, then why are we using the same old plays for Roy? If he truly doesn't have the "legs" or "explosiveness" of old, then why keep the plays that are catered to this?
4.) Defensively, in this series, Roy isn't playing worse than the other guards defensively, so he is just as much a detriment to the club in this series on defense.
So don't you think it's unfair to expect Roy to contribute of Old, when you aren't given him the minutes to establish his game? Why is Nate keeping the old plays for Roy, instead of drawing up new ones that cater to his new physical ability?
I think we are only hurting Roy's confidence more because most fans don't know the game, and expect the old Roy to play. This is unfair for the team and Roy. Yes, Roy should be contributing to his "max contract", but anyone with any B-Ball IQ knows that's impossible. Wouldn't it be better to try and get the most out of Roy, instead of exploiting him negatively? I don't say to give Roy a ton of minutes, but if you want the same Roy, then you need to give him a ton of minutes to establish the game. Kinda a catch 22.
1.) Roy of old. I remembered him not really "scoring" too much in the first half. Basically waiting for his game to come to him. Of course there are exceptions, but I remembered the majority of his games, he played tentative in the 1st and 2nd and turned it on in the third and fourth quarters.
2.) It's obvious Nate is playing Roy as more of a "role player", in terms of minutes; yet he expects Roy to do the things Roy does before his injury.
3.) There was a comment made about Roy being more of a "James Jones" type of contributor; which maybe the best role for him. If this is true, then why are we using the same old plays for Roy? If he truly doesn't have the "legs" or "explosiveness" of old, then why keep the plays that are catered to this?
4.) Defensively, in this series, Roy isn't playing worse than the other guards defensively, so he is just as much a detriment to the club in this series on defense.
So don't you think it's unfair to expect Roy to contribute of Old, when you aren't given him the minutes to establish his game? Why is Nate keeping the old plays for Roy, instead of drawing up new ones that cater to his new physical ability?
I think we are only hurting Roy's confidence more because most fans don't know the game, and expect the old Roy to play. This is unfair for the team and Roy. Yes, Roy should be contributing to his "max contract", but anyone with any B-Ball IQ knows that's impossible. Wouldn't it be better to try and get the most out of Roy, instead of exploiting him negatively? I don't say to give Roy a ton of minutes, but if you want the same Roy, then you need to give him a ton of minutes to establish the game. Kinda a catch 22.
