Top Barack Obama Donors Net Government Jobs

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PapaG

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
32,870
Likes
291
Points
0
Same old same old...

the quid pro quo must be allowing Obama to demonize you as a "fat cat" so the idiotic voters will think he's for the Little Guy, yet then give you plush positions in the gov't., and federal contracts for your private businesses.

Such blatant corruption is staggering to me.


Telecom executive Donald H. Gips raised a big bundle of cash to help finance his friend Barack Obama’s run for the presidency.

Gips, a vice president of Colorado-based Level 3 Communications, delivered more than $500,000 in contributions for the Obama war chest, while two other company executives collected at least $150,000 more.

After the election, Gips was put in charge of hiring in the Obama White House, helping to place loyalists and fundraisers in many key positions. Then, in mid-2009, Obama named him ambassador to South Africa. Meanwhile, Level 3 Communications, in which Gips retained stock, received millions of dollars of government stimulus contracts for broadband projects in six states — though Gips said he had been “completely unaware” that the company had received the contracts.

More than two years after Obama took office vowing to banish “special interests” from his administration, nearly 200 of his biggest donors have landed plum government jobs and advisory posts, won federal contracts worth millions of dollars for their business interests or attended numerous elite White House meetings and social events, an investigation by iWatch News has found.

These “bundlers” raised at least $50,000 — and sometimes more than $500,000 — in campaign donations for Obama’s campaign. Many of those in the “Class of 2008” are now being asked to bundle contributions for Obama’s reelection, an effort that could cost $1 billion.

As a candidate, Obama spoke passionately about diminishing the clout of moneyed interests. Kicking off his presidential run on Feb. 10, 2007, he blasted “the cynics, the lobbyists, the special interests,” who had “turned our government into a game only they play.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56993.html#ixzz1PMR1uJOa
 
Well, we still run the country with the spoils system. I'm not opposed to a President bringing in their own people. Hell, I would. I do have a problem with the feds "knowingly" feeding the companies where they came from federal monies as some sort of prize, but just because such a company gets federal money does not in & of itself make the case for anything illegal or unethical. It might be worth looking into, but that's for others to decide.
 
Well, we still run the country with the spoils system. I'm not opposed to a President bringing in their own people. Hell, I would. I do have a problem with the feds "knowingly" feeding the companies where they came from federal monies as some sort of prize, but just because such a company gets federal money does not in & of itself make the case for anything illegal or unethical. It might be worth looking into, but that's for others to decide.

That's one way to look at it. A more cynical view shows me that if a person raised between $50k and $500k for Obama, then that person was paid back with government positions, or even government contracts for their companies, as a reward. When Republican presidents do this, it is called corruption. When a Democrat does it, it apparently is just bring competent people into government.
 
I heard this on the radio and just sighed. How ridiculous.

Obama is not all that different from George.

"Change you can believe in".

Obama apparently said that just because they are donors doesn't mean they should be disqualified from gov't jobs, lol.
 
Last edited:
How much would I have to donate to become ambassador to Fiji?
 
That's one way to look at it. A more cynical view shows me that if a person raised between $50k and $500k for Obama, then that person was paid back with government positions, or even government contracts for their companies, as a reward. When Republican presidents do this, it is called corruption. When a Democrat does it, it apparently is just bring competent people into government.

Nonsense.

This is what every President does. It's what you or I would do in our businessess if we were hiring. Reward those who helped you build the company, since they've shown they can perform and they are loyal and somewhat like-minded.

Obama's biggest mistake to date is that he kept way too many Bush/Cheney people in top positions. That's why so little has changed from the Bush years.

He should have completely cleaned house.
 
That's one way to look at it. A more cynical view shows me that if a person raised between $50k and $500k for Obama, then that person was paid back with government positions, or even government contracts for their companies, as a reward. When Republican presidents do this, it is called corruption. When a Democrat does it, it apparently is just bring competent people into government.

Who was the last Republican to get in trouble for this?
 
Nonsense.

This is what every President does. It's what you or I would do in our businessess if we were hiring. Reward those who helped you build the company, since they've shown they can perform and they are loyal and somewhat like-minded.

Obama's biggest mistake to date is that he kept way too many Bush/Cheney people in top positions. That's why so little has changed from the Bush years.

He should have completely cleaned house.

So Obama is just like Bush.

I get it now.

Hope and Change = More of the Same.

How about a real outsider getting a chance to not make the rich get richer?

I'd add that 'rewarding' people with taxpayer dollars isn't really a reward from the recipient of the first bribe, but I know it will go right over your little brain.
 
Who was the last Republican to get in trouble for this?

Exactly. I see no outrage about Republicans always doing this more than Democrats.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top