USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

[Sedatedfork]

I thought Elvis was a Clinton fan. Hey does Bill Clinton play saxophone anymore? Wiener plays sexy phone, but that didn't work out so well for him, did it.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[Sedatedfork]

Turns out Trumps sniffling was some flags stuck in his nose.

 

[riverman]

Trump has shown me one thing...more Americans read the national enquirer than I had imagined

 

[blue32]

Turns out Trumps sniffling was some flags stuck in his nose.

Hahaha that's pretty damn creative.

 

[stampedehero]

Fortunately you can find those types of people on both sides of the party lines. Pictures like this just show Sly is a little one sided, but we knew that.

Sly knows about targeted marketing and can wag a dog any time.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Donald Trump Makes History With Zero Major Newspaper Endorsements

http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment...php?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

 

[Denny Crane]

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...clinton-democrats-barack-obama-middle-america

Some of Clinton's pledges sound great. Until you remember who's president

The puzzle that is currently frustrating the pundit minds of America is this: why is Hillary Clinton not simply clobbering Donald Trump? How is this ranting, seething buffoon still competitive with her? Trump has now stumbled through a series of the kind of blunders that break ordinary political campaigns – the sort of deadly hypocrisies that always kill the demagogue in old movies – and yet this particular demagogue keeps on trucking. Why?

Let us answer that burning pundit question of today by jumping to what will undoubtedly be the next great object of pundit ardor: the legacy of President Barack Obama. Two months from now, when all the TV wise men are playing historian and giving their estimation on where Obama ranks in the pantheon of the greats, they will probably neglect to mention that his legacy helped to determine Hillary’s fortunes in this election cycle. As a beloved figure among Democrats, for example, Obama was instrumental in securing the nomination for her. As a president who has accomplished little since 2011, however, Obama has pretty much undermined Clinton’s ability to sell us on another centrist Democratic presidency. His legacy has diluted her promise.

The reform impulse just keeps short-circuiting every time the Democrats try to switch it on

Let me put this slightly differently. Hillary Clinton has lots of good policy ideas. She promises many fine things. That these things do not attract more voters to her side is (as many have noted) partially due to her wonkish way of presenting them. But it is even more because of the glaring contradiction between the nice things she says she will do and the failure of Obama to advance the ball very far on those same issues.

 

[Denny Crane]

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...clinton-democrats-barack-obama-middle-america

Some of Clinton's pledges sound great. Until you remember who's president

The puzzle that is currently frustrating the pundit minds of America is this: why is Hillary Clinton not simply clobbering Donald Trump? How is this ranting, seething buffoon still competitive with her? Trump has now stumbled through a series of the kind of blunders that break ordinary political campaigns – the sort of deadly hypocrisies that always kill the demagogue in old movies – and yet this particular demagogue keeps on trucking. Why?

Let us answer that burning pundit question of today by jumping to what will undoubtedly be the next great object of pundit ardor: the legacy of President Barack Obama. Two months from now, when all the TV wise men are playing historian and giving their estimation on where Obama ranks in the pantheon of the greats, they will probably neglect to mention that his legacy helped to determine Hillary’s fortunes in this election cycle. As a beloved figure among Democrats, for example, Obama was instrumental in securing the nomination for her. As a president who has accomplished little since 2011, however, Obama has pretty much undermined Clinton’s ability to sell us on another centrist Democratic presidency. His legacy has diluted her promise.

The reform impulse just keeps short-circuiting every time the Democrats try to switch it on

Let me put this slightly differently. Hillary Clinton has lots of good policy ideas. She promises many fine things. That these things do not attract more voters to her side is (as many have noted) partially due to her wonkish way of presenting them. But it is even more because of the glaring contradiction between the nice things she says she will do and the failure of Obama to advance the ball very far on those same issues.

That and she's a lying crook.

 

[blue32]

But it is even more because of the glaring contradiction between the nice things she says she will do and the failure of Obama to advance the ball very far on those same issues.

I mean it doesn't take a fucking genius to figure her out. She is nothing but a typical political mouthpiece. She doesn't speak the truth. Sure everything she says sounds so great and wonderful, a typical American utopia she keeps describing, all of USA's problems fixed, just "elect me". Her talk is nothing more than the typical "too good to be true" bullshit. Same ol' same ol' from the last 30 to the next 4-8 with her. There will be no positive change with her, because there was no positive change with Obama and their party runs on smoke and mirrors and corruption of the highest level.