I disagree Ron he (Utley) made no attempt to slide toward the bag, he went completely to the right of the bag to take out Tejada. I mean he didn't even start his slide until he was even with the bag. With that said, one game & a fine would have been enough IMO.
...Rick, the rules have never been interpreted that way before. Simply put, Mets fans see it as a dirty slide and Dodger fans see it as a clean slide....the others are pretty much split....like I said, there are contradictory flaws in the rule book which counter Torre's ruling..For example, .the runner does not
have to slide toward the bag. The runner does not have to begin his slide at a certain point...the runner only has to be within reach of the bag with either foot or either arm.
...I have already said that something needs to be done concerning the rules on this kind of play. They changed the rules a couple of years ago to help protect catchers when Buster Posey got hurt on on a home plate collision.
...I'm not saying it was not a vicious slide and a horrible injury an loss for the Mets. I also understand that in todays game, teams invest a lot of money into their player want to be protected, and I get that and I've said the rules or the way the rules are interpreted on this play should be amended in order to protect infielders...but the was nothing Utley did or didn't do that violated
current rules.
...The problem here is not the play itself, but instead, the way the rules have always been interpreted...the ruling on the field at the time it was made was that Utley was forced out and the play was even later reviewed again and the Umps on the field not only determined that the slide was not only legal, but also decided that Utley was safe. Torre's over-reactionary and over-officious ruling is therefore an admission that the rules do in fact need to be changed. And IMO, Torre's decision is attempting to retroactively discipline Utley...which is BS.