Vegas Over/Under for Blazers: 26.5 (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Stevenson

Old School
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
4,175
Likes
5,419
Points
113
Per CBS Sports:

"Portland Trail Blazers (26.5): I believe this will be the worst team in the league. They have some talent, but the fit together, combined with the kinds of issues they have with specific holes (rim protection, playmaking, shooting) has me concerned. I like the under strongly. Hope they prove me wrong."

I'll take the over, but not by much.
 
Per CBS Sports:

"Portland Trail Blazers (26.5): I believe this will be the worst team in the league. They have some talent, but the fit together, combined with the kinds of issues they have with specific holes (rim protection, playmaking, shooting) has me concerned. I like the under strongly. Hope they prove me wrong."

I'll take the over, but not by much.
So who wrote that--HCP, tlong, or oldfisherman?
 
Sounds about right... I'd take the over, but it'd only be by maybe a game or two.
 
Hopefully under. I want to get the #2 draft pick.
 
Man that's a great number.

As a former gambler, I'd tell people to pass on this one
 
I'd see what the odds when to if I gave them 34.5. And then bet the over. And not sweat it.
 
How can this be? I thought we had 3 future all stars and we were making the playoffs!
 
I don't know. But even Vegas thinks you're at least 7 games off. :dunno:

No they don't.

They set the number to get people to bet both sides evenly. It means Vegas believes the rest of the people disagree with HCP :)
 
I would take the over easily on that. The consolation prize if I'm wrong will be a nice lottery pick.
 
lol, worst team in the league, idiot

#over
 
Last edited:
Like I said in the past, folks. We are peaking in terms of popularity with the press. Absolutely peaking.
 
We've learned from politics how to be popular and assholes at the same time
 
I find it interesting that some people don't trust Olshey with a high draft pick - but are willing to trust in his ability to make trades and sign FAs.
 
I find it interesting that some people don't trust Olshey with a high draft pick - but are willing to trust in his ability to make trades and sign FAs.

The only pick he's ever had in the top half of the lottery was Damian Lillard at #6. As others have mentioned, he nailed that one.

The second highest pick he's ever had as #8 in 2010. He took Al-Farouq Aminu. He passed on Gordon Hayward and 9 and Paul George at 10. So, he didn't nail that one, but he wasn't the only one who passed on those guys. It wasn't like he took Evan Turner (PHI) or Wesley Johnson(MIN) over DeMarcus Cousins.

He has no history with a top 3 pick. So, his performance is inconclusive at this time.

BNM
 
I've projected us at 30 wins. Although if Damian get injured or nobody becomes that second quality starter we are easily 22. If we stay healthy and multiple young guys make big improvements we could push 38 wins. So I'd lean towards betting the over but it's not as much as a lock as two years ago when we were projected for I think 35 wins and hit 54.

The Blazers often have some good value bets because so few fans out there are betting on our small market team.
 
How can this be? I thought we had 3 future all stars and we were making the playoffs!

Whether or not we have 3 future all stars on the current roster is irrelevant for the odds for this season. PHI could very well have 3 future all stars on their current roster, but in spite of playing in the weakest division of the weakest conference could actually win even fewer games than us this season. Also, PHI's three best prospects all play the same position. So, even if they are all future all stars, they likely won't be all stars for PHI.

BNM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top