So then you go with stand pat. My personal belief (hope) is a combo of Ramon Sessions and Bayless manning the point for the foreseeable future. One or the other of those two will stick long term. My consolation prize is Hinrich. Rubio sounds wonderful but seems unlikely.
Yeah that would be a mistake. I think I would rather have Hinrich then Nash just for the defense. Nash is a nice thought but I don't think he can live up to the reality. His defense is horrid and he has no prayer of staying in front of the faster guards = more Oden fouls. Sessions is very intriguing and at least has the physical tools to stay in front of the faster guards. He desperately needs to work on his 3 ball. I think a rotation of he and Bayless at the point is steady enough that we can have a growth year for everyone and have a relatively similar record. If either Bayless or Sessions fits like a glove then we have a real shot at WCF.
Yes that was one pleasant draft day suprise. I also think you are right. If they were looking to replace Charlie V their draft would have been different. Looks like Sessions is available. Get'er done KP!
Oversight on my part. You're right although I'm not a Bibby fan, at least not in this stage in his career...
They go over the Lux if they match us. They wanted to ensure they resigned one or the other. Looks like it was Charlie V. We would probably do a sign and trade with Outlaw and Blake out of Courtesy and to clear our roster.
Agreed on both points. We'll see but the whispers of KP's weakness as a GM (overvaluing his own guys/falling in love with the lineup), will turn into a thundering chorus if there is no improvement at PG/SF and back up PF by training camp. I can live with Batum, but starting Blake for more then half the year would be a huge mistake. I wonder about KP but I know Nate has an unhealthy attachment to Blake.
