Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
clearly the answer was “we didn’t have Melo” and now that we do have Melo clearly the answer is "Melo."
not a surprising development considering he was a 39 year old big man who had recently had surgery for a broken foot
I'd put some practical reasons up higher then any of your listed reasons for the Blazers inability to lure FAs of note. #1 Smaller market = far less endorsement dollars & no star treatment from officials. #2 Most traveling miles of any team in the league. #3 cold & wetBe it taxes, African-American entertainment shortcomings, keepin' it weird, or whatever, FA's generally cross this city off their respective lists.
Remind me of some of the great FAs either of those teams have landed as I can't think of any. Drafting, trading for & resigning, sure.I don't always buy this argument. Do you have any idea what it's like being non-white, non-Mormon in Salt Lake City? Or Oklahoma City? Those cities land some great FAs and the market "culture" lends nothing to an NBA player's culture.
I'm not totally sure the OKC one is all that fair they've only been around a decade and had some really highly paid players that have kept them from having a ton of salary cap space.Remind me of some of the great FAs either of those teams have landed as I can't think of any. Drafting, trading for & resigning, sure.
STOMP
Name the very good player we let go
Aminu isn't good though... This is his averages through 11 games with Orlando.Aminu
Tawnia approves of this message.Jeff Gillooly
Aminu isn't good though... This is his averages through 11 games with Orlando.
4.1 ppg, 4.6trb, 0.9 assists, 30.4% fg%, 30.0% 3point fg%, 37% efg. This has been his first year being an elite defender though his DPBM is 3.2. People talked like he was a great defender, was never above a 2 in his years in portland.
You left out turner.But I wouldn't use an 11 game sample, and Aminu has to be used correctly. He has have sufficient offensive threats around him so he can stand in the corner and shoot 36% from 3 and never have to shoot a mid-range shot. Here's a large sample. I took average RPM/BPM for the past 5 years weighted more towards recent years. RPM and BPM are "points above an average player per 48 minutes". Each +1 point translates into a bit under 3 wins/season if a player played 48 minutes. So for wins I scaled according to MPG of each player. "Both" is average of RPM and BPM. "Wins" is "Both" x 2.8 / MPG.
Bottom line, we netted -9 wins per 82 games. But it's really more like -11 because the players on the right are playing less minutes than those on the left and we are having to fill in with other scrubs/raw players. We are seeing this play out on the floor.
View attachment 28511
You left out turner.
Slow start?????Why the slow starts each of the previous 3 seasons without "umpteen" new guys then?
Whoa there now.... There are always plenty of reasons to blame HCP. This post seems lazy and unmotivated!I blame HCP.
No reason.
Could add Taxes as well.I'd put some practical reasons up higher then any of your listed reasons for the Blazers inability to lure FAs of note. #1 Smaller market = far less endorsement dollars & no star treatment from officials. #2 Most traveling miles of any team in the league. #3 cold & wet
STOMP
I'm not really sad about any of the departures. I think Harkless and Aminu were a pretty awful pairing as starters (I think a contending team could be ok starting one or the other), not both, even last year in the playoffs their minutes dropped. The real issue is the Blazers banked on Zach being the man at PF. The role players sure maybe they got worse, but they did basically nothing to shore up that position if anything happened to Zach.I left out turner because I was happy for him to leave. So Turner will bring it down some, but then Tolliver is probably way over-rated since he's falling off a cliff and Curry is probably underrated as an improving player.
I think they were good, not awful. They’re just the kind of players that don’t look good. Marginal offensive players with good defense who do little things that matter but are hard to notice. Better to have Zach + Aminu than just Zach. Zach could have continued increasing minutes from Aminu with either coming off the bench, whatever worked better chemistry-wise. Aminu being awkward and looking not as good as he is is an added bonus really - undervalued, underpaid.I'm not really sad about any of the departures. I think Harkless and Aminu were a pretty awful pairing as starters (I think a contending team could be ok starting one or the other), not both, even last year in the playoffs their minutes dropped. The real issue is the Blazers banked on Zach being the man at PF. The role players sure maybe they got worse, but they did basically nothing to shore up that position if anything happened to Zach.
The problem is they didnt do a lot of small things to win especially Harkless. Aminu had moments. I dont think keeping Aminu was ever really in the plans because of money. I probably overall liked Aminu better than Harkless. However I dont really miss either that much.I think they were good, not awful. They’re just the kind of players that don’t look good. Marginal offensive players with good defense who do little things that matter but are hard to notice. Better to have Zach + Aminu than just Zach. Zach could have continued increasing minutes from Aminu with either coming off the bench, whatever worked better chemistry-wise. Aminu being awkward and looking not as good as he is is an added bonus really - undervalued, underpaid.
The problem is they didnt do a lot of small things to win especially Harkless. Aminu had moments. I dont think keeping Aminu was ever really in the plans because of money. I probably overall liked Aminu better than Harkless. However I dont really miss either that much.
Sure the replacements havent been good. Heres the issue Meyers, that horse was long since dead, he needed a change of scenery and so did most Blazer fans. Aminu / Harkless we had seen that Merry go round for years and seen that when the playoffs came it just didnt work. It was bordering insanity to just keep doing it with the same results. Nurkic broke his leg, and they didnt have a center. Whiteside on paper seemed like a good addition to a position they needed. Tolliver was definitely a head-scratcher, Mario was a lot like when they brought in Moe and Aminu, a young athletic guy who had way underachieved from expectations, they were wanting to get something out of him.The players we replaced them with are much worse. What’s the point of letting go of a player who is “not good enough” when the replacement is utter trash. Advanced stats say they did something good and it wasn’t offense. Both are above average players and above average is not so easy to come by.
It must be surprising to the Blazers since they and Pau indicated he would be ready by the start of the season.
yeah, right....because a stress fracture of a foot severe enough to require surgery has a very predictable recovery timeline, especially for a 39 year old, 7' basketball player. I mean, we've never seen recoveries from foot surgeries take longer than anticipated. That was all sarcasm by the way
my question is, why risk it when the front office had the Ezeli example to use as a template?
Chief is missed the most...he was our defensive floor general and actually an elite defender...great rebounder and great help defenderName the very good player we let go
