<div class="quote_poster">Quoting SkiptoMyLue11:</div><div class="quote_post">Close, but Adam Morrison has 15 pounds on Reddick and 4 inches.
Shaq vs. a Sumo Wrestler
Mike Tyson (in his prime) vs. Bruce Lee (in his prime)
Mike Tyson and Bruce Lee vs. 3 Sumo wrestlers
Shaq, Andre the Giant, and the Big Show vs. Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson and Ben Wallace</div>
About Pac, I know he's dead, these are all hypothetical situations anyway, so assuming he was alive. I'm talking Tupac in 96 vs Kobe in 2006.
I'd take Shaq over the sumo wrestler. I don't think Sumo wrestlers have much muscle mass? They are more so just covered in fat wheras Shaq has like 10% body fat or something, which is actually not that bad for a guy who's 320 lbs or something. Plus he's taller and has brute strength and I'm assuming he's much quicker then them.
Mike Tyson vs. Bruce Lee...I'd take Bruce Lee. This one's tough. Tyson's quick, but Bruce is quicker then even he is. And what Tyson brings in terms of brute strength, Bruce doubles up for technique. Not to mention that he knew martial arts...
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Mike Tyson and Bruce Lee vs. 3 Sumo wrestlers</div>
Mike and Bruce. Bruce would be too quick and Mike could knock two out at a time.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post"> Shaq, Andre the Giant, and the Big Show vs. Bruce Lee, Mike Tyson and Ben Wallace </div>
That's three slow 7 foot dudes verses an extremely quick and skilled (and strong) martial artist, a brute monster in terms of strength and quickness in Mike Tyson and a guy based off mure muscle in Ben Wallace.
I'd take the latter. I think Ben Wallace could handle Shaq while Bruce Lee takes care of Andre with his quickness and Mike Tyson knocks out the Big Show.
My battle: Shaq in his Orlando days (young, more lean and quicker) vs. Shaq in 2000 (absolutely dominant, somewhat more bulky/chubbier)