Will Bush go down as the worst President of all time?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
No, Jimmy Carter is by far the worst ever. Warren G. Harding is also considered a horrible on as well. Some will say Herbert Hoover because during his adimistration the stock market fell out.
 
Absoutely not. The way he rallied America after 9/11 was amazing. The guy is one hell of a leader and he showed his leadership after that day. His second term hasn't been going very well but he isn't the worst President ever.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pjcolpitts @ May 8 2006, 02:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, Jimmy Carter is by far the worst ever.</div>That's ridiculous.No he won't, but he's still a terrible president which has done far more damage then good in our country.How the hell did he do anything after 9/11 that any other president wouldn't have done? I'm sick of Bush adovcates using that to support him, he did nothing that anyone else wouldn't have done.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JustBlaze @ May 8 2006, 02:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How the hell did he do anything after 9/11 that any other president wouldn't have done? I'm sick of Bush adovcates using that to support him, he did nothing that anyone else wouldn't have done.</div> Exactly, any President would have done what he did and after tragic events presidents throughout history have done the same thing. He will go down as one of the top 3 or so worst president ever, he's the worst in my mind. Bush is just such a dumbass that nobody in this country takes him seriously. Now this dumb F*ck puts a military general to head the CIA, what a joke.
 
Like I said in the other thread, most Presidents are a victim of circumstance. President Bush had went through one of the most difficult times for a President to face but he also got the benefit of the doubt because of those times. Because of 9/11, I feel Bush will not be considered the worst President of all time.
 
Well if that's the only thing redeeming him from an otherwise awful presidency then I don't think it should matter.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mr Wolf @ May 8 2006, 05:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Like I said in the other thread, most Presidents are a victim of circumstance. President Bush had went through one of the most difficult times for a President to face but he also got the benefit of the doubt because of those times. Because of 9/11, I feel Bush will not be considered the worst President of all time.</div> It won't matter, 9/11 or no 9/11. The guy is a joke and the most inept President we have ever had. Conservatives left and right and turning on him.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mr Wolf @ May 8 2006, 01:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Like I said in the other thread, most Presidents are a victim of circumstance. President Bush had went through one of the most difficult times for a President to face but he also got the benefit of the doubt because of those times. Because of 9/11, I feel Bush will not be considered the worst President of all time.</div>The dumbfuck ignored a letter warning him about it.
 
That letter was very vague and Bush i'm sure gets threats all the time.
 
It's not easy making a decision about terrorists attacking your country.I'm sure sitting back and not have gone to war isn't very smart.I think he has just been put through hard times.I do not feel he is one of the worst ever but I feel he has not done the job he was voted for.
 
Being the President isn't excatly as easy as some make it out to be.
 
Hell No.Theres many far worse than Bush. Carter is one of them..
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ May 8 2006, 08:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Exactly, any President would have done what he did and after tragic events presidents throughout history have done the same thing. He will go down as one of the top 3 or so worst president ever, he's the worst in my mind. Bush is just such a dumbass that nobody in this country takes him seriously.Now this dumb F*ck puts a military general to head the CIA, what a joke.</div>That is exactly the way I feel. He knows absolutely nothing and wouldn't be president if his dad wasn't.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LUD @ May 9 2006, 09:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That is exactly the way I feel. He knows absolutely nothing and wouldn't be president if his dad wasn't.</div>Yes, the American people re-elected him because his dad was President.Sure, his dad being rich, famous and a former President helped him but let's face it...Bush was better than Kerry and Gore and he got elected. As bad as Bush has been I can't believe what this country would be like if John Kerry and his cabinet were running it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JustBlaze @ May 9 2006, 09:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How would Kerry have been worse?</div>Did you see the campaign that he ran? It was basically, "Atleast I'm not Bush". Kerry is a joke.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JustBlaze @ May 9 2006, 07:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>How would Kerry have been worse?</div>October 24, 2004Bush/Kerry IQ ComparisonSteve Sailer has an exhaustive analysis of standardized tests taken by the two candidates, including SATs and officer candidate aptitude tests, to conclude that, if anything, George Bush is probably a little smarter than John Kerry. The article wanders a great deal, and never quite gets down to claiming a direct comparison, but if I read it right the conclusion is that both men have IQs of 120 or higher, and that Bush's is probably in the range 125-130. In other words both are above the 90th percentile in IQ, but Kerry's is probably in the low 90s and Bush's in the mid 90s. Sailer also draws some conclusions about the differences between how the men are likely to use their gifts: " The subtle difference between Bush and Kerry in two words: Bush is competitive and Kerry is ambitious." Read the whole thing.there you go
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mr Wolf @ May 10 2006, 02:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Did you see the campaign that he ran? It was basically, "Atleast I'm not Bush". Kerry is a joke.</div> That's the way the media spun everything, they played mostly sound bites of him ripping Bush and left out of the more 'boring things' that he was running on. I went to a Kerry rally and the local news later that night only showed him when he was talking about Bush and the end statment and left out all of his ideas and plans.
 
The IQ thing is ridiculous, Bush barely graduated from college and that's a bunch of bullsh**, he's obviously an idiot.Can someone please give me some legitimate reasons why Kerry would have been far worse than Bush is?
 
That's just what some conversatives say but they have nothing to back it up...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top