Woman Suing Honda Over Mileage

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

ABM

Happily Married In Music City, USA!
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
31,865
Likes
5,785
Points
113
http://autos.yahoo.com/news/woman-takes-unique-road-to-sue-honda-over-mileage-20120103.html

A woman who expected her 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid to be her dream car wants Honda to pay for not delivering the high mileage it promised. But rather than joining other owners in a class-action lawsuit, she is going solo in small claims court, an unusual move that could offer a bigger payout if it doesn't backfire.

A trial is set for Tuesday afternoon in Torrance, where American Honda Motor Co. has its West Coast headquarters.

Heather Peters says her car never came close to getting the promised 50 miles per gallon, and as its battery deteriorated, it was getting only 30 mpg. She wants Honda to pay for her trouble and the extra money she spent on gas.

Peters, a former lawyer who long ago gave up her bar card, has devised a unique legal vehicle to drive Honda into court — a small claims suit that could cost the company up to $10,000 in her case and every other individual case filed in the same manner.

If other claimants follow her lead, she estimates Honda could be forced to pay $2 billion in damages. No high-priced lawyers are involved and the process is streamlined.

"I would not be surprised if she won," said Richard Cupp Jr., who teaches product liability law at Pepperdine University. "The judge will have a lot of discretion and the evidentiary standards are relaxed in small claims court."

A win for Peters could encourage others to take this simplified route, he said.

"There's an old saying among lawyers," Cupp said. "If you want real justice, go to small claims court."

But he questioned whether her move, supported by publicity on the Internet and elsewhere, would start a groundswell of such suits. He suggested that few people would want to expend the time and energy that Peters has put into her suit when the potential payoff is as little as a few thousand dollars.

Peters opted out of a series of class-action lawsuits filed on behalf of similar Honda hybrid owners when she saw a proposed settlement would give owners no more than $200 cash and a rebate of $500 or $1,000 to purchase a new Honda.

The settlement would give trial lawyers $8.5 million, Peters said.

"I was shocked," she said. "I wrote to Honda and said I would take $7,500, which was then the limit on small claims in California. It is going up to $10,000 in 2012."

She said she also offered to trade her hybrid for a comparable car with a manual transmission, the only thing she trusted at that point.

"I wrote the letter and I said, 'If you don't respond, I will file a suit in small claims court.' I gave them my phone number," she said. "They never called, and I filed the suit."

She said she also sent emails to top executives at Honda with no response.

Aaron Jacoby, a Los Angeles attorney who heads the automotive industry group at the Arent Fox law firm, said Peters' strategy, while intriguing, is unlikely to change the course of class-action litigation.

"In the class-action, the potential claimants don't have to do anything," Jacoby said. "It's designed to be an efficient way for a court to handle multiple claims of the same type."

He also questioned her criticism of class-action lawyers for the fees they receive. Jacoby, who handles such cases, said lawyers who take on the multiple clients involved do extensive work — sometimes spanning years — and are not in it just for money.

"They're representing the underdog and they believe they are performing a public duty," he said. "Many of these people could not get lawyers to represent them individually."

American Honda's offices were closed for the holidays and no one could be reached for comment. Peters said the company has tried five times to delay the trial but each effort was rebuffed.

The upside of Peters' unusual move, she says, is that litigants are not allowed to have lawyers argue in small claims court in California. This means any award will not be diluted by attorney's fees. Honda would have to appoint a non-lawyer employee to argue its side in court.

"If I prevail and get $10,000, they have 200,000 of these cars out there. That's a potential payout of $2 billion," she said.

While she doubts that all other owners will take the same route, she suggests the penalty could be substantial for the company if a large percentage of the owners file individually.

A judge in San Diego County is due to rule in March on whether to approve Honda's latest class action settlement offer. Members of the class have until Feb. 11 to accept or decline the settlement.

Peters has launched a website, DontSettleWithHonda.org, urging others to take the small claims route.
 
Stupid Honda, they should have just followed Chevy's lead and made a car no one wouldn't want then they wouldn't have this problem. :ghoti:
 
Class actions are a joke. They often serve to bully corporations into settlements that don't really help anyone but attorneys.

Did any of you get notice of a TicketMaster class action settlement? I can't remember the exact details, but it was in response to TicketMaster not revealing that some charges associated with shipping were a profit-maker for the company (which is a ridiculous thing to HAVE to state... does anyone really think that it costs that much to ship a couple slips of paper?) and it ended up with TicketMaster (a) adding language to clarify the charges are an effort to make profit, (b) giving the attorneys millions for their time and efforts, and (c) giving individuals $1.50 (or was it $3? I'm not sure) per instance of buying from TM over a certain amount of time--towards future TM purchases!

What a joke. I'd rather have TicketMaster keep its money than attorneys get that kind of deal for me. I don't buy tickets through TM because their fees are too high, and no number of disclaimers is going to change that... future credits are worthless to me.

Ed O.
 
Stupid Honda, they should have just followed Chevy's lead and made a car no one wouldn't want then they wouldn't have this problem. :ghoti:

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Dang, that was funny.
 
Ticketmaster is notorious for gouging. Years ago Pearl Jam tried to lead a lawsuit-boycott against them but most other groups were too dumb to join.

This latest suit is probably motivated by the gouging the customers can't get at, so they sue over what they can.
 
seems like a rather dumb suit. a car doesn't make the mileage they're promised.

wow.

surprise.

(insert reference to objects in mirror being larger than they appear).
 
(insert reference to objects in mirror being larger than they appear).

image.php
 
Ticketmaster is notorious for gouging. Years ago Pearl Jam tried to lead a lawsuit-boycott against them but most other groups were too dumb to join.

This latest suit is probably motivated by the gouging the customers can't get at, so they sue over what they can.


Companies often price gouge themselves out of business too. So don't worry too much.
 
They have no competition so they charge what they want. I worry about this all day long.
 
You're right. Empirical reality isn't happening, because it violates a logical principle.
 
You're right. Empirical reality isn't happening, because it violates a logical principle.

Sorry I am a little sleepy, lol.

"they can't force you to buy anything", that's better.
 
Last edited:
Also you can boycott big business, they're very scared of you believe me. Even the middle east succumbed to market equilibrium.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top