You Can Tell the Obama Lackeys Are Desperate

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PapaG

Banned User
BANNED
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
32,870
Likes
291
Points
0
It's amusing, yet sad, to watch the President accuse his opponent of a felony without any proof or investigation.

If Romney committed a felony by lying to the SEC, shouldn't Eric Holder be investigating him? :confused:
 
I want Obama to be president.

It'll give the Media less excuses once he fucks up the second term too. Besides Romney blows anyway.
 
Obama's second term will be delicious only to see the right-wing-tards froth themselves to near 1997-Clintonian era levels. I'm assuming the impeachment hearings are already planned.
 
This kind of stuff happens all the time. Why is everyone so stuck on it?

Are you sure?

I can't recall the last time a sitting President allowed a top official in their administration to accuse a rival candidate of having committed a felony, despite there being no investigation, no evidence or no indication of such act, failing to call for an official investigation, failing to write a letter to the proper authorities, etc.; then when called on it by the press, specically affirming the attack by the underling, thus making her statements completely owned by him.

Sure, there are examples of politicians wallowing deep in the mud (but far less often than you seem be implying). But, we are talking a sitting President, not just wallowing DEEP in the mud, but frolicking in it.

But, you say it happens all the time. Please remind me of several of those past instances. Thanks.
 
Obama's second term will be delicious only to see the right-wing-tards froth themselves to near 1997-Clintonian era levels. I'm assuming the impeachment hearings are already planned.

I'm always amazed at the ability of the "open-minded" Left to hate people who think differently.
 
I'm always amazed at the ability of the "open-minded" Left to hate people who think differently.

Chrisinpdx is in an extreme minority, though, just as Shooter used to be an extremist for this community's "right".
 
Are you sure?

I can't recall the last time a sitting President allowed a top official in their administration to accuse a rival candidate of having committed a felony, despite there being no investigation, no evidence or no indication of such act, failing to call for an official investigation, failing to write a letter to the proper authorities, etc.; then when called on it by the press, specically affirming the attack by the underling, thus making her statements completely owned by him.

Sure, there are examples of politicians wallowing deep in the mud (but far less often than you seem be implying). But, we are talking a sitting President, not just wallowing DEEP in the mud, but frolicking in it.

But, you say it happens all the time. Please remind me of several of those past instances. Thanks.

Hasn't happened. Not only did Obama refuse to downplay those very bold and inflammatory claims, but he also said that Romney should have to answer for them, and that as President, "The buck stops with you". Yes, he botched Truman's great line, but he wasn't on the 'Prompter, so it's just another gaffe from President BushDidIt.
 
If Romney committed a felony by lying to the SEC, shouldn't Eric Holder be investigating him? :confused:

Maybe he is, you don't know.

barfo
 
Are you sure?

I can't recall the last time a sitting President allowed a top official in their administration to accuse a rival candidate of having committed a felony, despite there being no investigation, no evidence or no indication of such act, failing to call for an official investigation, failing to write a letter to the proper authorities, etc.; then when called on it by the press, specically affirming the attack by the underling, thus making her statements completely owned by him.

Sure, there are examples of politicians wallowing deep in the mud (but far less often than you seem be implying). But, we are talking a sitting President, not just wallowing DEEP in the mud, but frolicking in it.

But, you say it happens all the time. Please remind me of several of those past instances. Thanks.

Nixon pretty much did everything possible that was evil.
 
Funny when people want to bring up polls as an indicator of anything when I can't even find out how to 'vote' in this damn poll.

Ah well...
 
Funny when people want to bring up polls as an indicator of anything when I can't even find out how to 'vote' in this damn poll.

Ah well...

It's almost like you have no idea how polls are created...
 
I don't believe in those polls. I believe in elections.

So where'd you get 60% from? Obama got 52.9% of the popular vote back in 2008, and the GOP trashed his party in the 2010 elections.

I'm curious to see where you get 60% from based on your belief in elections.

Ed O.
 
So where'd you get 60% from? Obama got 52.9% of the popular vote back in 2008, and the GOP trashed his party in the 2010 elections.

I'm curious to see where you get 60% from based on your belief in elections.

Ed O.

I was being facetious.

Obama will be voted back in office though, majority rules!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top