Crowtbot asked me this question in another thread, but I believe my answer needs to be in its own thread. So he asked what is omnibenevolent? And with some thought I started asking myself this question. What makes God good? One can use silly cliche like "forbid to lie", or other various human traits that we used to try to make sense of everything. But what does that matter? Why does a lion care less about how you felt when he's tearing your flesh from your skin to feed himself?! What does any of this really matter?! Why would the sun care that it's ray beams life blood to our planet to feed the trillions, maybe infinite amount of life; yet it does? So then it hit me. Gods sacrifice to mankind... The creator of all the heavens and earth, everything and anything couldn't create us to live a sinless life and give us "free will". That he would sacrifice the powers that make him omniscience or omnipotent so that man could have "free will". And that free will that maybe 99.9% would freely love God no matter what trials, tortures or harm that sin puts before him and still won't have that person stop and believe and love in God. And what if 99.9% didn't believe in him or falls victim to sin, torment or harm; he's be willing to bet the entire existence of him, the universe and everything for that 0.1% that say "I love you as much as you love me". That's omnibevelant. That is true love. That is true good. That is God Then
Seriously think for a moment... What if God must endure all your pain, your suffering, your harm to seek the truth? That God must give up his powers to be God, so you would have the free will to decide for yourself. If God is in you, then what you feel is what God feels. Is it worth it? Would you go through hell to know true love?
Now multiply that to infinity. There as much infinite pain, suffering and torment that must take place from good for 1 free will "I love you". And since God is in us, he endure all. He endures our arrogance, hate, sin or evil as if he was bound by your free will. And being perfect, imagine how hard that is to endure? And scale it down to something as small as your own child. You knowing what's right for your kids, yet understand they have free will to go against everything good in your mind. Yet we still have kids. That's why we get married. That's why we have pain. The moment someone says back "I love you" it's worth it all
free will means that god does not control man whatsoever right? powerless to influence their will? but doesnt god perform miracles, to save people from horrible things occasionally?
This is an interesting question. I had always thought in the same vein about miracles, healing and what not. In a fairly recent occurrence I was doing a bit of reading and discovered for myself that most of the time when Jesus preformed miracles, it was to prove a greater point, and many times he was more concerned with healing a people rather than a person.
If man decided to open the flood gates of every possible evil and every possible good the moment Adam and Eve decided to eat from the tree of knowledge, then that event released any possibility of happening. Meaning Satan had ultimate power of influence, while God had that same influence. But I'm not going to pretend that I do know all the answers. I don't think anyone does. I'm just trying to but a philosophical beginning. When we are absent from sin the moment we become one with God, the events that happened to get to that point really shouldn't matter.
http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-man-arrested-burning-urinating-bible-224340810.html "Unlawful symbol burning?" WTF?
Weird that you would put it here. If he urinated on the Bible, you would assume he exposed himself. Isn't "indecent exposure" against the law?
He was charged with "unlawful symbol burning." "Someone" is not omnibenevolent. The ACLU guy is right (read the article). The guy is entitled to his 1st amendment right of free speech.
Normally I would love to have a back and forth debate with you, but your method makes little to no sense. The concept of Omnibevelant God has no relation to a man arrested for burning a cross. God didn't force the man to burn the cross, not did he force the police to arrest that very same man. There is absolutely no relevance whatsoever. But if your point was to derail the thread, then you have done it with precision.
I'm more interested in what you think it means that God IS good (Omni-good), not what you think is a good action on his part by your personal judgment, which is all you are describing. Does God even have the capacity for "bad" actions?
That is a question that is not philosophical. If you can't use your "personal conviction", not judgement as you described, then what shall we use? I believe someone giving "ultimate sacrifice" is a pretty good argument of good. I'm curious what you think is good, since it seems you aren't satisfied with my philosophical reasoning.