Trade Ideas 2024 Offseason

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by blazerkor, Apr 16, 2024.

?

How many players on our current roster will we trade this offseason?

  1. 1

    10.3%
  2. 2

    30.8%
  3. 3

    38.5%
  4. 4

    10.3%
  5. 5 or more

    10.3%
  1. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,521
    Likes Received:
    34,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Normally I would do that, but for this year, I'm not sure. #20 in the next 2 year's Drafts? Yes.

    Grant gets us #5 AND that size of TPE? Where do I sign up?

    There is so much noise in ORL about getting Ant. I think fans there may be quite disappointed if they don't get their home town kid. Agreed, Washington would almost certainly want more than Walker/Anthony back.

    This type of move would seem likely given ownership's history and us being in the Lux Tax.
     
    cheesehoff likes this.
  2. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,713
    Likes Received:
    33,746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know teams can agree to exchange draft picks + players in the draft with the trade to be finalized after July 1 when teams will have cap-space (I'm not sure if it happens much; I'm assuming it has but it's probably uncommon)

    with that in mind + the fact that both Orlando and OKC will have cap-space in July:

    Portland trades Ant + #34 to Orlando
    Orlando trades WCJ + #18 to OKC; 2025 or 2026 lottery protected 1st to Portland
    OKC trades #12 to Portland

    * Orlando gets their back court help, but I'd wonder if WCJ and two first's would be way too steep a price (And they might not have space depending on Fultz)

    * OKC gets a 2nd big who would fit very well with their roster and could play with Holmgren. They may need to pay more than moving down from #12 to #18 and the more they pay might help grease the wheels for Orlando. (the fault line might be that OKC has big plans for their cap-space)

    * Blazers add the 12th pick; a future 1st; and a 26M TPE

    it may not move the needle enough for either Orlando or OKC; I'm not sure. But it does give the Blazers some options. With Detroit apparently willing to trade #5, maybe Grant + #14 for #5 and another giant TPE? Would having 7+12 + Brogdon convince Houston to give up #3? What could the Blazers do with #3+#5?

    there could be more moving parts in the original 3 team trade. OKC is apparently shopping Giddey and they have oodles of picks
     
  3. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,813
    Likes Received:
    1,707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what are your plans for the tpe
     
  4. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,813
    Likes Received:
    1,707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the trick with orlando is getting them to send out picks that are neither 2024, nor that denver 2025 "first."
     
    TBpup likes this.
  5. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,713
    Likes Received:
    33,746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    to have it available for future opportunities
     
  6. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,713
    Likes Received:
    33,746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since Larry Coon has not updated his CBA FAQ for the new CBA (and he may not be planning too), I wanted to explore/talk a bit about the ramifications of the minimum team salary provision. (And since I don't feel like dooing a Google deep dive)

    as I understand it, the CBA changed so that cap-space can not be carried into the regular season anymore. If a team doesn't meet the team salary minimum (90% of the cap which will be 127M). For example if a team has 30M in cap-space with 111M in total guarantees, and they don't use any of it by opening night, they lose the space and end up credited with 141M in guarantees. I might be mistaken, but that means that the most cap-space any team can carry into the regular season is 10% of the cap. The trick for teams that want to carry some space is is to just hit the minimum team salary mark without going over by much. The ability to perform precise payroll contortions could be valuable

    the reason I'm wondering about this is for TPE's. I'm not sure if using a TPE changes that Payroll charge. The gap this season between the 141M cap and the 172M tax line is 31M; and between the cap and 1st apron is 37-38M. So for example, it the trade fantasies I had above, if the Blazers ended up with a couple of TPE's of 20M+, and they carried them into the season, they might be a lot more valuable because of the limitations on cap-space
     
  7. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    8,186
    Likes Received:
    7,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Save luxury tax
     
  8. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,713
    Likes Received:
    33,746
    Trophy Points:
    113


    no surprise he talks about Ant to Orlando

    it's Ant for Antony Black + #18 + 2025 Denver 1st + 18.3M TPE

    I might be being greedy, but I'd like the Blazers to get the more favorable of the Denver/Orlando 1st round picks

    and pretty much I'd like to see how high Portland might move up by combining 14+18 or 7+18
     
    robson and Natebishop3 like this.
  9. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,988
    Likes Received:
    41,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seems like Simons for Black+ is the universally-accepted trade idea around the NBA this summer. Will annoy the heck out of me when it doesn't happen.
     
    RR7 and Natebishop3 like this.
  10. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    20,531
    Likes Received:
    16,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Im Orlando not sure about giving up that much for Simons?
     
  11. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,896
    Likes Received:
    14,335
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good. Black does not excite me at all.
    I know he is 6'6" but he has a smaller wing span than both Ant and Scoot
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2024
  12. Boomchakalaka2

    Boomchakalaka2 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2024
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    43
    With #3 and #5, the Blazers could trade Ayton and #3 to Atlanta using the gained TPE and obtain the #1.

    with #1, pick Risarcher

    with #5, pick Clingan
     
  13. Samuel

    Samuel James “Hollywood” Robinson

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,813
    Likes Received:
    1,707
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeah that denver pick is doo doo and ya'll know how I feel about 2024 picks. :)

    I'd be fine with leaving black out of the deal and getting an unprotected future orlando pick and the denver pick vs black and another 2024 asset (and I like anthony black).
     
    TBpup likes this.
  14. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    8,186
    Likes Received:
    7,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Duncd on podcast had an interesting idea about trading Towns for Grant. They are just in the 2nd apron so that would get Minnesota out of it. They actually used it as an example of why Towns won't be traded as they thought this doesn't make sense for Minnesota. Also would need a 3rd team to give PDX salary relief and take on Towns.

    Interesting idea though, I think that Minnesota roster would be way better balanced, main problem is Grant being older than Towns IMO.
     
  15. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    91,376
    Likes Received:
    53,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    How about something like this?

    upload_2024-6-5_10-33-54.png

    We end up with 5th, 7th and 14th. We can either package and move up or just take BPA at all three spots.
     
    TBpup, blazerkor and Pinwheel1 like this.
  16. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,988
    Likes Received:
    41,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd love it. Feels a bit light for the Wolves, but perhaps that's just me undervaluing our players.
     
    Wizard Mentor likes this.
  17. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    91,376
    Likes Received:
    53,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Honestly I'd give them 14 if we were getting 5. I'm still hopeful that we can swap Simons with Orlando. If we really wanted to move up into the late lottery, we could probably pair the 18th and 34th pick.

    But we'd end up with Duren, 5, and 7. That's a nice group of young guys coming in.
     
    TBpup, blazerkor and PtldPlatypus like this.
  18. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,896
    Likes Received:
    14,335
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unless come tax time, the Wolves think that 20 million per year less for Grant has value.

    KAT $49,350,000 $53,298,000 $57,246,000 $61,194,000
    Grant $29,793,104 $32,000,001 $34,206,898 $36,413,790
     
    wizenheimer likes this.
  19. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    21,713
    Likes Received:
    33,746
    Trophy Points:
    113

    good point

    as of right now, Minny is scheduled to be 20M over the tax line; 13M over the 1st apron, and 3M over the 2nd apron. And that's only for 10 players. 26M/year for Jaden McDaniels?

    KAT has 4 years left on his deal at 55M/year. He's a good player but that's a lot of money for a big who has averaged less than 55 games/year over the last 6 seasons
     
  20. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    11,307
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    I tried to think of a trade of Brogdon and Grant with Towns going to a third team; would have to wait until Towns' new salary kicks in, but what team would want to give up assets for Towns and his ballooning salary?
     

Share This Page