If i was to pick today i think i would take Homgren, Banchero and Sochan over him. Jalen William, Kessler and Duren are debatable, but i think i would take Sharpe over them.
Well when your first line of D, the backcourt, is consistently terrible on D you need to have Gobert behind them to balance it out. And even Gobert wouldn't be enough I guess.
Actually i was thinking of a 3 team trade with Dallas and Utah
We get Vanderbilt and Olynyk
Dallas gets Nurk, Beasley
Utah gets Bertans,Bullock,Watford an unprotected 1st from Dallas
And what about OKC that have been sellers for an eternity? Now they have a similar record + a shitload of picks, much younger team and a very low payroll. It's unbelievable as well.
Really is there any basketball fan that would dislike this trade? I mean AD is so much better at basketball than the other 2, it's not even close. Injury prone yes, but at least he gives us a chance. With the other 2 and the 38M they occupy we have 0 chance.
Unfortunately Nurk has a huge body, but mentally he is a midget. He has this crazy idea imprinted on him since many years ago that he is has so much talent and being underutilised so when he doesn't get enough balls he checks out mentally.
Eubanks is defintely not better, but at some point...
Maybe Kings being 3rd in the Conference want to push for it? If Jerami agrees to an extension i think this is a good trade for both teams. Murray is a good shooter on a rookie deal. A solid starter for a team that is playing winning basketball. Holmes fils a need.
The problem is our guards and Nurk cannot guard a chair. Maybe time to start Eubanks and Little. Bring Ant off the bench and trade Nurk for a mobile big man. If it's not that then do something else, but at least try!
Or just keep doing what we are doing so we get the best pick possible next year.
Forgot Devin Booker and probably Jordan Poole as well.
He has to really elevate his offensive game to be considered a solid lead guard for a playoff team as he is so bad defensively. And he needs to work better next to Dame because his numbers when Dame is available are not good. 19.4 pts/2.8...
I think Claxton is way better than Nurk for today's game. Not even close in my opinion. Much younger and cheaper as well so even if they were close skill wise I don't think it makes sense for the Nets