05-06 Starting Lineup

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Mr. J

Triple Up
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
9,912
Likes
19
Points
38
Now that we have Brown here, let?s predict the starting lineup for the Knicks. He loves to play veterans and experienced players who play defense so it will probably look much different from last year?s lineup.

I think it will look something like this:

<u>05-06 Starting Lineup:</u>
PG: Stephon Marbury
SG: Quentin Richardson
SF: Jerome Williams
PF: Malik Rose
C: Jerome James

Assuming our roster looks like this on opening night, that?s how I think our lineup will look like. All of our offensive firepower will come off the bench and from the backcourt when starting. Marbury and Richardson aren?t great defenders and hopefully Brown can make them at least decent, so that?s why JYD and Rose who are active defenders will be excellent helpers and Jerome James will block shots from penetrating players. Foul trouble is his biggest issue, but hopefully Frye can make up for the rest of the minutes and become a good shot-blocker.

Any other ideas?
 
Why not keep Crawford at SG and Richardson at SF and has Jerome Williams come off the bench?
 
I think the only people who you can consider locks to be on that lineup are Quentin Richardson and Channing Frye, everyone else is likely to be considered for trade talk and can be replaced.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting NbaBaller:</div><div class="quote_post">Why not keep Crawford at SG and Richardson at SF and has Jerome Williams come off the bench?</div>

Cause than your lineup sucks defensively.
 
I see Jerome James starting over Channing Frye because he's an experienced vet. It can be the other way around depending on who ever is more impressive in training camp, though.
 
Question: Why JYD over Ariza at the SF spot? Is it because he's a vet and experienced like you said or what? LB does like playing his vets, but he won't put a matchup like this on the floor. When he took over the Pistons he put Prince in the SF spot over the likes of Ham and Williamsom, Ham being the "JYD" in this situation.

When you're facing Wade, Carter, Pierce, LeBron, and co. in the East, doesn't it seem kind of foolish starting JYD over Ariza? I mean Williams is a good defender, but he's not a good on ball, man-to-man defender like Ariza to guard these players. He's the best defender out of Marbury, Q and himself, so I assume that he's the one that you picture to guard these players.
 
J, your lineup has no low post scoring. A front court of career backups is not going to work. Do not be surprised if Maurice Taylor is starting at the 4 position. The Knicks will need someone who can score in the low post. I don't feel Sweetney is ready for that role, so there has to be someone who can force the defense to pay attention to them on the block, otherwise the perimeter players won't have a chance. LB will have to whip Taylor into shape defensively, just enough to make him give some effort at that end. With some defensive effort from the guy, he can be a productive player.
 
I wouldn't like Jerome Williams starting at the three because a lineup like this would look much better.

PG: Stephon Marbury
SG: Quentin Richardson
SF: Trevor Ariza
PF: Mike Sweetney
C: Jerome James

Larry Brown this year should experience with the young players for a little bit early in the season. If he likes what he sees in Sweetney, the Knicks could have their power forward for the next couple years. LB will test out Ariza and Sweetney early in the season, and if they don't work out the way he planed he'll go back to Rose and Williams.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">PG: Stephon Marbury
SG: Quentin Richardson
SF: Trevor Ariza
PF: Mike Sweetney
C: Jerome James</div>
I agreed with this lineup I think Brown will test Arzia's defensive Skills I hope he makes a pure impression because I for one love Ariza's playing skills.He need'sto work more on his jumper.But in the other areas he is a good player and can become a defensive threat in the future for us.
 
I see our lineup like this:

PG: Stephon Marbury
SG: Jamal Crawford
SF: Quentin Richardson
PF: Mike Sweetney
C: Jerome James

I would love to see Ariza start but LB probably won't cause he is still unproven on offense. LB likes Crawford so I don't see him not cracking the starting 5. That leaves the SF spot, and it would come down to whether or not TT is still on the team cause he may get the start over Q Rich, but I would put Q there as the starter. I just wish we had a better Center to start than Jerome.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Waneko:</div><div class="quote_post">Do not be surprised if Maurice Taylor is starting at the 4 position. The Knicks will need someone who can score in the low post. I don't feel Sweetney is ready for that role, so there has to be someone who can force the defense to pay attention to them on the block, otherwise the perimeter players won't have a chance. LB will have to whip Taylor into shape defensively, just enough to make him give some effort at that end. With some defensive effort from the guy, he can be a productive player.</div>
I would put Mo in front; if only he knew how to rebound. Throughout his career he's averaged around 8.8 r/48min while Sweetney and JYD have averaged 13.8 and 14.1 respectively. Jerome James can't rebound at all, and we need to compensate.

Seeing that LB will experiment with moving Marbury to the off-guard, mine would be:
C: Jerome James
PF: Jerome Williams
SF: Trevor Ariza
SG: Stephon Marbury
PG: Jamal Crawford
6m: Quentin Richardson

James starts because we don't have anyone else. He's a big body, and he'll take up some space. He can block shots here and there. Frye will come in and provide some quality minutes at the 5 spot. JYD starts over Sweetney because he can run the floor. Hopefully the team can initiate some fastbreak points early on in the game to get them started. Sweetney will come in late in the 1st and play 20-30 minutes, while JYD and Mo will split the rest in between (depending on if we need team defense and hustle or scoring). Ariza starts for his perimeter D. He can also run the floor and get some transition baskets. Tim Thomas will back him up. Marbury starts at the 2, Crawford starts at the 1. We'll see if he can distribute the ball better than Marbury. Q will be a pseudo 6th man, as he'll probably get as many minutes as Crawford and Marbury. Nate or Snow/Ollie/whoever we sign will back up the point. Q will back up the 2 spot, and him and JYD will both spend time covering the 3 when Tim and Ariza are tired.

If only we didn't sign Jerome James. I like Q, but I would've rather traded KT for a veteran center with an expiring contract. (I would've liked Nazr to be back, but that would've been unlikely since the Spurs are looking to dump Nesterovic and his fat contract). I'd then use the MLE on a solid PG like Antonio Daniels. We would've had a starting lineup like this:

C: Nazr Mohammed
PF: Jerome Williams
SF: Trevor Ariza
SG: Stephon Marbury
PG: Antonio Daniels
6m: Jamal Crawford
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">If only we didn't sign Jerome James. I like Q, but I would've rather traded KT for a veteran center with an expiring contract. (I would've liked Nazr to be back, but that would've been unlikely since the Spurs are looking to dump Nesterovic and his fat contract). I'd then use the MLE on a solid PG like Antonio Daniels. We would've had a starting lineup like this:

C: Nazr Mohammed
PF: Jerome Williams
SF: Trevor Ariza
SG: Stephon Marbury
PG: Antonio Daniels
6m: Jamal Crawford</div>I agree, I like that too, but I think there's no way it could be possible, sounds like a fantasy to me.

Honesly, I believe the only way out of this Marbury Crawford situation is to trade one of them. Isiah wouldn't trade for anyone to play guard in front of Marbury or Crawford, he would think it's a waste of money. That's not how he roll.
rolleyes.gif
 
PG- Stephon Marbury
SG- QRich
SF- Ariza
PF- Malik
C- Jerome James
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting playmaker31:</div><div class="quote_post">PG- Stephon Marbury
SG- QRich
SF- Ariza
PF- Malik
C- Jerome James</div>
No chance. Malik won't start at the 4. Ariza wouldn't start in his second year, Larry probably doesn't consider Ariza a talent similar to the one he had in Prince. Richardson would start at 3, Crawford the 1, and Marbury the 2. Sweetney or JYD would start at the 4.

Starting 5 (projected by me as of 8/6/05):
1 - Crawford
2 - Marbury
3 - Richardson
4 - Sweetney/Williams
5 - James
 
^ Defensive nightmare for the Knicks at the 1 2 and 3. I don't care how good LB is good at making players a notch better at defense, but all 3 of those players are horrible at D. Considering that LB is a defensive minded coach and preaches defense, that makes no sense. Atleast, that could be possible at the end of the year, but not at the start.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Banks:</div><div class="quote_post">^ Defensive nightmare for the Knicks at the 1 2 and 3. I don't care how good LB is good at making players a notch better at defense, but all 3 of those players are horrible at D. Considering that LB is a defensive minded coach and preaches defense, that makes no sense. Atleast, that could be possible at the end of the year, but not at the start.</div>
What did you think of Chauncey defensively before Larry stepped into Detroit?
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Knicks Analyst:</div><div class="quote_post">What did you think of Chauncey defensively before Larry stepped into Detroit?</div>

Average defender in Minny. Better than all of those 3 combined.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Banks:</div><div class="quote_post">Average defender in Minny. Better than all of those 3.</div>
I thought he was below average, I really did. He made him into a very good defender. That would likely mean he could take players who are slightly worse defensively than Billups was in Minnesota and make them solid-good.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Knicks Analyst:</div><div class="quote_post">I thought he was below average, I really did. He made him into a very good defender. That would likely mean he could take players who are slightly worse defensively than Billups was in Minnesota and make them solid-good.</div>

Not really, he was always a solid, good defensive player and was getting better each year. LB helped him turn him into one of the best defensive PG's in the league. You can't say the same about the other 3 players because they aren't relatively close to the level as Billups, defensively, Pre-LB. Right now all of these players are awful, level two below average defenders. When LB took on Billups, he already was an average defender (as previously mentioned). Honestly, I can't really see any of these players being average defenders. It's possible that they can become just below average instead of awful, but to start all of them at the beginning of the season under LB is a season nightmare in the making.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Banks:</div><div class="quote_post">Not really, he was always a solid, good defensive player and was getting better each year. </div>
So first he was average, now good? I thought he was average? I'm confused, Banks.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
LB helped him turn him into one of the best defensive PG's in the league. You can't say the same about the other 3 players because they aren't relatively close to the level as Billups, defensively, Pre-LB. Right now all of these players are awful, level two below average defenders. When LB took on Billups, he already was an average defender (as previously mentioned). Honestly, I can't really see any of these players being average defenders. It's possible that they can become just below average instead of awful, but to start all of them at the beginning of the season under LB is a season nightmare in the making.</div>
Ok, he turned (average) Billups into NBA-defensive 2nd team quality defender. That means he can't make raw Crawford into an average-solid defender? What about the quick Marbury? He can't turn out to be a solid defender with Brown's help? The same question applies to Richardson. Larry Brown is a defensive mastermind, he can mold them into defenders, just you wait and see.

I can see JYD or Ariza starting, but I feel like Isiah will push for LB to get those guys to work and get them to play some tougher D. I guess I have more faith in LB than you.
 
What about Richard Hamilton? He was known as an awful defender just like Marbury, Crawford and Richardson and Larry Brown made him decent. Also, Brown said if you don't play defense, you won't play. When you factor that in, Marbury - who wants to play every minute of the game, will be motivated to play defense. Same thing applies for Crawford and Richardson. Brown, as KA said, is a defensive mastermind. He isn't regarded as the best defensive coach for anything.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Knicks Analyst:</div><div class="quote_post">So first he was average, now good? I thought he was average? I'm confused, Banks.</div>

I mean average. That's a careless typing mistake. Developing into a good player is what he was then.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">Ok, he turned (average) Billups into NBA-defensive 2nd team quality defender. That means he can't make raw Crawford into an average-solid defender? What about the quick Marbury? He can't turn out to be a solid defender with Brown's help? The same question applys to Richardson. Larry Brown is a defensive mastermind, he can mold them into defenders, just you wait and see.</div>

Billups is a good defender, one of the best at PG in the NBA, but playing with good help defenders in Prince and the Wallaces inside, will help boost your credibility as a good defensive player. Not taking away anything from Billups, but being named to the 2nd team had alot to do with the players he was playing with and the defensive sucess of the team. Even though I consider him one of the best defensive PG's in the NBA, that doesn't say much because he wasn't even the best defensive PG on his team. Nonetheless, he was atleast 2 levels higher defensively (Pre-LB) than Marbury/Q/Crawford.

On the other hand, everyone can be defenders, but their are different type of defenders. You have to understand that none of these players are good defensive players. They may possess tools to be just below average defensive players, but watching all of these players play, it seems unlikely. The best defensive player I can see is Marbury. He has the quickness and work ethic (knowing that he's never been on a winning team in his career) to do whatever it takes to be the best defender he can be.

Q doesn't have the tools. He has slow mobility with his feet, and he just doesn't look like he wants to play defense. He's also stupid on defense too, because if you watched some Suns games last year, his man would be often left open on miss communication. Obviously this can be fixed, but someone who is not that quick on their feet in terms of mobility, especially at SG/SF, doesn't really have the tools to be average defenders.

If you honestly think LB can turn these players to average defenders (I can understand Marbury) then why won't he start Ariza? LB loves swingmen who can defender, like McKie and Prince. Ariza is already a good defender, so under LB he can be a very good defender, right? Why not start him over those one of those 3 players?

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">I can see JYD or Ariza starting, but I feel like Isiah will push for LB to get those guys to work and get them to play some tougher D. I guess I have more faith in LB than you.</div>

You do, but I don't think he'll let the team suffer early on in the season by starting all of those 3, who are defensive liabilities. As I said, if they improve during the season, you might see them start later close to the end of the year.

<div class="quote_poster">Quoting MrJ:</div><div class="quote_post">What about Richard Hamilton? He was known as an awful defender just like Marbury, Crawford and Richardson and Larry Brown made him decent. Also, Brown said if you don't play defense, you won't play. When you factor that in, Marbury - who wants to play every minute of the game, will be motivated to play defense. Same thing applies for Crawford and Richardson. Brown, as KA said, is a defensive mastermind. He isn't regarded as the best defensive coach for anything.</div>

Hamilton was not an "awful" defensive player Pre-LB. He was below average and right now he's just decent, like you said. Coming out of college in his rookie year, he wasn't very good at all on defense, but like many rookies, he progressed by each game. You could actually see him improving on D when MJ arrived and that continued anually.

I understand you guys being optimistic, but LB can't turn awful defenders to average defenders. I doubt really any coach can. He will make you a notch better if you are willing to (which you will have to in order to play) . If you recently in Detroit, Prince, who cracked playing time because of his defensive skills Pre-LB, turned into good defender to a very good one. He went a level higher. Same with Billups, same with Rip. In Philly, Eric Snow went up a level higher when he arrived from Seattle. Under LB, you'll be better defenensively, that's a given, but he won't turn awful defenders to average defenders.
 
See now, I only somewhat disagree with Banks on his last point. Coaches don't make individual players into excellent defenders when there's nothing to work with. But systems make teams better defensively when they have the right pieces in place.

And whether we realize it or not right now, LB's system has worked everywhere he's gone, and the pieces he has now are a great foundation. He will make that backcourt play D, and he will make that frontcourt help them, and that's the name of the game.

I see a starting lineup after a nice long time in training camp, looking like this:

1. Jamal Crawford
2. Stephon Marbury
3. Trevor Ariza
4. Mike Sweetney
5. Jerome James

Marbury's days at the point guard slot are officially over. He's just not playing there anymore. What's more, I think this lineup wins games, plenty of them. Probably in the neighborhood of 40+, once we see them click 10-15 games into the season. And yes, MrJ, I don't see LB just giving up on some games for the sake of chemistry, he's there to win, and he'll put whatever lineup on the floor that will do that. Q may have to sit some to start the season, but he will also come around into the system and we may see some displacement there. Jamal Crawford will be defending that perimeter far better than he has in the past, the very first time he hits the floor when the season begins. Not only that, he may be exercising an entirely new skill set altogether. One way or another, we'll be seeing a lot of him.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Banks:</div><div class="quote_post">I mean average. That's a careless typing mistake. Developing into a good player is what he was then.


[quote name='banks']
Billups is a good defender, one of the best at PG in the NBA, but playing with good help defenders in Prince and the Wallaces inside, will help boost your credibility as a good defensive player. Not taking away anything from Billups, but being named to the 2nd team had alot to do with the players he was playing with and the defensive sucess of the team. Even though I consider him one of the best defensive PG's in the NBA, that doesn't say much because he wasn't even the best defensive PG on his team. Nonetheless, he was atleast 2 levels higher defensively (Pre-LB) than Marbury/Q/Crawford.</div>
Ben Wallace helped, of course. Chauncey was getting to be quite good before the acquisition of Rasheed, and Prince was developing with him. Billups got better in the first half of the 03-04 season, even without Rasheed, I'll give you Big Ben, but Prince was still developing and 'Sheed hasn't reached town.
And even if he was better pre-LB than those three, does that mean that they can't develop to being average? No, it means the chances of being great defenders is less.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
On the other hand, everyone can be defenders, but their are different type of defenders. You have to understand that none of these players are good defensive players. They may possess tools to be just below average defensive players, but watching all of these players play, it seems unlikely. The best defensive player I can see is Marbury. He has the quickness and work ethic (knowing that he's never been on a winning team in his career) to do whatever it takes to be the best defender he can be. </div>
How often did you watch? Crawford has a damn good chance, he just needs to focus on it. His hands are quicker than Marbury's and he can make quick decisions. More importantly Crawford is not the type to take too many gambles on defense, something LB likes. LB can definitely make Crawford a good, pesky, defender. Marbury's work ethic enables him to be a good defender, he's alsovery quick - LB can work with him. If anyone can get through to these guys, it's Brown.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
Q doesn't have the tools. He has slow mobility with his feet, and he just doesn't look like he wants to play defense. He's also stupid on defense too, because if you watched some Suns games last year, his man would be often left open on miss communication. Obviously this can be fixed, but someone who is not that quick on their feet in terms of mobility, especially at SG/SF, doesn't really have the tools to be average defenders.</div>
His foot speed certainly isn't there, you're right. And he did look pretty stupid on defense, true. Larry will install a defense-based system, so Richardson can't be dumb or he won't get playing time - Richardson can straighten out in that regard. The slow feet, I know that can't change. But you can't say that slow footwork knocks out average defense, look at Shane Battier - in no way is he fast but he's smart and plays in a good defensive system. Q will be one notch below average, but Ariza off the bench makes up for that.
Look, I'd rather Ariza start over Q, I just don't see it. I hope Larry starts Ariza, I just think that he will be under tremendous pressure from Isiah and Dolan to start Richardson.
Keep in mind those are the starting line-ups that I just foresee, not that I want.
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
If you honestly think LB can turn these players to average defenders (I can understand Marbury) then why won't he start Ariza? LB loves swingmen who can defender, like McKie and Prince. Ariza is already a good defender, so under LB he can be a very good defender, right? Why not start him over those one of those 3 players?
As I said before, Isiah and Dolan will smother him with complaints. He may be forced to cave in to them.
Remember: I want Ariza TO START. Remember that! I like him more than the next guy.

You do, but I don't think he'll let the team suffer early on in the season by starting all of those 3, who are defensive liabilities. As I said, if they improve during the season, you might see them start later close to the end of the year.</div>
What do you think the line-up will be? The exact same with Ariza at the 3? I would like that more, but I think Isiah will strongly hint that he wants Q to start.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
Hamilton was not an "awful" defensive player Pre-LB. He was below average and right now he's just decent, like you said. Coming out of college in his rookie year, he wasn't very good at all on defense, but like many rookies, he progressed by each game. You could actually see him improving on D when MJ arrived and that continued anually. </div>
He was not a good defender pre-LB. Now he's considered to be a pesty defender, people have to make adjustments ocassionally because he can really stick to guys. That was not the case in Washington.

<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">
I understand you guys being optimistic, but LB can't turn awful defenders to average defenders. I doubt really any coach can. He will make you a notch better if you are willing to (which you will have to in order to play) . If you recently in Detroit, Prince, who cracked playing time because of his defensive skills Pre-LB, turned into good defender to a very good one. He went a level higher. Same with Billups, same with Rip. In Philly, Eric Snow went up a level higher when he arrived from Seattle. Under LB, you'll be better defenensively, that's a given, but he won't turn awful defenders to average defenders.</div>
You really can't say that. Marbury and Crawford are perfectly capable of being good defenders, and Crawford got a bit smarter as the year went on (improved). And Marbury's overall work ethic can't be questioned anymore, Im sure they're willing to listen - if not they'll get it from Isiah, that's for damn sure.
 
mo taylor is underrated. he is a good player who could be an all star if he was a couple inches taller
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting n-gezzy:</div><div class="quote_post">mo taylor is underrated. he is a good player who could be an all star if he was a couple inches taller</div>
I disagree. He doesn't pass, play defense, and he's streaky. He sometimes makes stupid plays on offense, clogging up passing lanes not recognizing that the Knicks are running a screen and as a result he messes up. He definetly hasn't done much in our system and I don't see him doing much in the future either.
 
I changed my lineup:

PG: Jamal Crawford
SG: Stephon Marbury
SF: Trevor Ariza
PF: Malik Rose
C: Jerome James
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting MrJ:</div><div class="quote_post">I changed my lineup:

PG: Jamal Crawford
SG: Stephon Marbury
SF: Trevor Ariza
PF: Malik Rose
C: Jerome James</div>

That's the spirit MrJ. Although I don't fully agree with Malik starting, atleast you don't have Crawford, Marbury and Q starting. I hope I persuaded the change of you're lineup
rolleyes.gif
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Banks:</div><div class="quote_post">That's the spirit MrJ. Although I don't fully agree with Malik starting, atleast you don't have Crawford, Marbury and Q starting. I hope I persuaded the change of you're lineup
rolleyes.gif
</div>
How many times have I said that I'd rather have Ariza start at the 3, but that I think Isiah will push Larry to start Q?
I like Ariza just as much as MrJ, and I've loved his game for a damn long time, don't you get me wrong here, mate. I'm one of Ariza's biggest fans. I just don't see him starting, although I want him to start.
 
<div class="quote_poster">Quoting Knicks Analyst:</div><div class="quote_post">How many times have I said that I'd rather have Ariza start at the 3, but that I think Isiah will push Larry to start Q?
I like Ariza just as much as MrJ, and I've loved his game for a damn long time, don't you get me wrong here, mate. I'm one of Ariza's biggest fans. I just don't see him starting, although I want him to start.[/b]</div>

Yea so, what's your point? I understand that...

EDIT:

The rolleyes smilie was directed towards myself, not you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top